![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My wife has had a detached retina and can't see out of that eye. I have CSR and have
little vision in one eye and don't see great with the other. I went from 27" crt to 32" HD. Our TV room ia 12 x 15 and we sit 10 to 12 ft from and see it fine. WTF is wrong with you ppl that you need such big screens? I wouldn't want anyting bigger than 32" in my room. I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fred wrote:
My wife has had a detached retina and can't see out of that eye. I have CSR and have little vision in one eye and don't see great with the other. I went from 27" crt to 32" HD. Our TV room ia 12 x 15 and we sit 10 to 12 ft from and see it fine. WTF is wrong with you ppl that you need such big screens? I wouldn't want anyting bigger than 32" in my room. I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() Do you find you are both squinting with your good eyes to see the TV? (serious question). I see lots of detail on my 65". You're missing a lot with a 32" HDTV at 10-12 foot with vision problems. Try it at about 2-3 feet to see what I am seeing. If that's bragging, then so be it. dan |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fred wrote:
I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() It depends on what you are watching. Content created for theatrical exhibition is expected to be displayed to an audience at 1 to 3 PH (picture heights) from the screen. That's either a big HDTV, or a close one. Why are homes going to bigger TVs? Well, apart from the fact that large LCDs are absurdly cheap in inflation-adjusted historical terms, the fact is that prior to HD content, a big or close screen meant big fuzzy pixels. NTSC was designed for a PH of 7, which you might reduce to 4 with broadcast- quality content. -- Regards, Bob Niland http://www.access-one.com/rjn email4rjn AT yahoo DOT com NOT speaking for any employer, client or Internet Service Provider. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fred wrote:
My wife has had a detached retina and can't see out of that eye. I have CSR and have little vision in one eye and don't see great with the other. I went from 27" crt to 32" HD. Our TV room ia 12 x 15 and we sit 10 to 12 ft from and see it fine. WTF is wrong with you ppl that you need such big screens? I wouldn't want anyting bigger than 32" in my room. I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() Gee whiz Fred, there's nothing wrong with people liking small TV screens, or big TV screens, or in between TV screens. We don't need tham, we just want them. So long as the kids have shoes and food, why not? -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:21:46 GMT, dan wrote:
Fred wrote: My wife has had a detached retina and can't see out of that eye. I have CSR and have little vision in one eye and don't see great with the other. I went from 27" crt to 32" HD. Our TV room ia 12 x 15 and we sit 10 to 12 ft from and see it fine. WTF is wrong with you ppl that you need such big screens? I wouldn't want anyting bigger than 32" in my room. I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() Do you find you are both squinting with your good eyes to see the TV? (serious question). I see lots of detail on my 65". You're missing a lot with a 32" HDTV at 10-12 foot with vision problems. Try it at about 2-3 feet to see what I am seeing. If that's bragging, then so be it. Well, overdoing is not a good thing either. If the panel you have is a direct view 65" panel in 1080 resolution, the pixel pith in the panel is about 0.75mm. People with normal eye sight will see the pixel structure also at a longer distance than the 5 feet you seem to suggest. Seeing the pixel structure is not a good thing becuse that is not part of the picture details. To give a smooth natural looking picture, the pixels should just blend toghether. My rule of thumb says that with a 65" 1080 panel you should try a distance around 10 feet. /Jan |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fred wrote:
My wife has had a detached retina and can't see out of that eye. I have CSR and have little vision in one eye and don't see great with the other. I went from 27" crt to 32" HD. Our TV room ia 12 x 15 and we sit 10 to 12 ft from and see it fine. WTF is wrong with you ppl that you need such big screens? I wouldn't want anyting bigger than 32" in my room. I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() With our larger screen,we can watch TV without our glasses on and watching football is now a much better experience.Bragging has got nothing to do with it. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Fred" wrote in message ... My wife has had a detached retina and can't see out of that eye. I have CSR and have little vision in one eye and don't see great with the other. I went from 27" crt to 32" HD. Our TV room ia 12 x 15 and we sit 10 to 12 ft from and see it fine. WTF is wrong with you ppl that you need such big screens? I wouldn't want anyting bigger than 32" in my room. I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() All depends on what your definition of "see it fine" is. If someone has hearing impairment and can't hear anything above 2k then FINE music reproduction is very different for that person than it is for someone who hears above 16k. If your television makes you happy with your vision impairment then I guess that's just fine for you, but I see no reason for you to brag about it. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Charles Tomaras wrote:
"Fred" wrote in message ... My wife has had a detached retina and can't see out of that eye. I have CSR and have little vision in one eye and don't see great with the other. I went from 27" crt to 32" HD. Our TV room ia 12 x 15 and we sit 10 to 12 ft from and see it fine. WTF is wrong with you ppl that you need such big screens? I wouldn't want anyting bigger than 32" in my room. I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() All depends on what your definition of "see it fine" is. If someone has hearing impairment and can't hear anything above 2k then FINE music reproduction is very different for that person than it is for someone who hears above 16k. If your television makes you happy with your vision impairment then I guess that's just fine for you, but I see no reason for you to brag about it. I would go further, there are some people I know who do not want anything bigger than a 22" and they would probably think a 32" was showing off. It's a personal choice. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:49:05 -0800 (PST), rjn
wrote: Fred wrote: I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() It depends on what you are watching. Content created for theatrical exhibition is expected to be displayed to an audience at 1 to 3 PH (picture heights) from the screen. That's either a big HDTV, or a close one. Why are homes going to bigger TVs? Well, apart from the fact that large LCDs are absurdly cheap in inflation-adjusted historical terms, the fact is that prior to HD content, a big or close screen meant big fuzzy pixels. NTSC was designed for a PH of 7, which you might reduce to 4 with broadcast- quality content. Homes are going to bigger tvs because homes are bigger now. Thumper |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:59:03 +0000, Naked Gonad
wrote: Charles Tomaras wrote: "Fred" wrote in message ... My wife has had a detached retina and can't see out of that eye. I have CSR and have little vision in one eye and don't see great with the other. I went from 27" crt to 32" HD. Our TV room ia 12 x 15 and we sit 10 to 12 ft from and see it fine. WTF is wrong with you ppl that you need such big screens? I wouldn't want anyting bigger than 32" in my room. I'm guessing 99% of you are simply looking for bragging rights ![]() All depends on what your definition of "see it fine" is. If someone has hearing impairment and can't hear anything above 2k then FINE music reproduction is very different for that person than it is for someone who hears above 16k. If your television makes you happy with your vision impairment then I guess that's just fine for you, but I see no reason for you to brag about it. I would go further, there are some people I know who do not want anything bigger than a 22" and they would probably think a 32" was showing off. It's a personal choice. Sure but you have to be damned close to a 22" to be able to read anything on the screen. Thumper |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Viewing distance? | Naked Gonad | High definition TV | 15 | March 1st 09 07:42 PM |
| Optimum viewing distance | Roger Mills | UK digital tv | 24 | January 26th 08 10:47 AM |
| Viewing distance? | RickH | High definition TV | 8 | October 8th 07 02:35 AM |
| Viewing Distance | Corporate Monkey | Home theater (general) | 4 | November 15th 05 12:18 AM |
| Viewing Distance | Pdelpriore | Home theater (general) | 8 | February 20th 04 03:35 AM |