![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thumper wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:54:23 -0500, "L Alpert" wrote: "JoeTheBlogger" wrote in message ... KHudson wrote: Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan, introduced a bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice of only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair to rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding of competition and what is fair I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business, PERIOD... http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml NO ACTUALLY THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY TO DUMOCratS HATE BUSINESS. Democrats don't hate businesses, they just view them as a revenue stream to feed more socialist programs. Too bad that's not true. IS TOO. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:55:14 -0600, Devil Dog wrote:
L Alpert wrote: "JoeTheBlogger" wrote in message ... KHudson wrote: Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan, introduced a bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice of only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair to rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding of competition and what is fair I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business, PERIOD... http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml NO ACTUALLY THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY TO DUMOCratS HATE BUSINESS. Democrats don't hate businesses, they just view them as a revenue stream to feed more socialist programs. I see the switch over date to digital has been changed (to stay on topic).... Yes but most of them are still going with February 17th date. Too bad, changing it will not only cause more confusion, but cost many stations a lot of money. In addition many were waiting for the high UHF spectrum for public safety as well as interagency communications. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:27:09 -0500, Kimba W Lion
wrote: Devil Dog wrote: Yes but most of them are still going with February 17th date. No, most are not. Plus, the FCC has to grant permission, on a case-by-case basis, to any station wishing to shut down analog before June 12. More than a third plan on changing on the 17th http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10161213-93.html As to who asked how many TV stations satellite stations would have to carry if they had to carry all local stations there are over 1600 TV stations in the US. That's more than all the channels on DISH Network and Direct TV combined. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:27:09 -0500, Kimba W Lion wrote: Devil Dog wrote: Yes but most of them are still going with February 17th date. No, most are not. Plus, the FCC has to grant permission, on a case-by-case basis, to any station wishing to shut down analog before June 12. More than a third plan on changing on the 17th http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10161213-93.html It's easy to get the FCC "permission": "My transmitter/antenna/studio is broken!" As to who asked how many TV stations satellite stations would have to carry if they had to carry all local stations there are over 1600 TV stations in the US. That's more than all the channels on DISH Network and Direct TV combined. Do any in that count of "local stations" include cable "public access"? |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
JoeTheBlogger wrote:
Thumper wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:54:23 -0500, "L Alpert" wrote: "JoeTheBlogger" wrote in message ... KHudson wrote: Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan, introduced a bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice of only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair to rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding of competition and what is fair I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business, PERIOD... http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml NO ACTUALLY THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY TO DUMOCratS HATE BUSINESS. Democrats don't hate businesses, they just view them as a revenue stream to feed more socialist programs. Too bad that's not true. IS TOO. Is NOT! [what a high level debate this has turned out to be!] |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chill Out wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:21:49 -0800, KHudson wrote for every to trash: Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan, introduced a bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice of only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair to rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding of competition and what is fair I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business, PERIOD... http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml Keith http://www.eBuyHD.com There is a problem with local channels in rural zones. If you live outside the Phoenix area you can't get Phoenix stations or your local station by satellite. The DTV conversion might help but if you only have 4 local channels you might get ABC, CBS and NBC but you probably won't get PBS, MyTv or CW. Which explains why the Ghost Whisper is still on the air. The very rural stations may be LP (low power) stations - it works for them because there is not much interference - and the LP stations do NOT Have to convert to digital at all! |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 13, 8:21*am, KHudson wrote:
Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan, introduced a bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice of only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair to rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding of competition and what is fair I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business, PERIOD... http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml Keithhttp://www.eBuyHD.com "Government hate business"?? Business RUNS the government. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:32:26 -0500, RickMerrill
wrote: Roger (K8RI) wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:27:09 -0500, Kimba W Lion wrote: Devil Dog wrote: Yes but most of them are still going with February 17th date. No, most are not. Plus, the FCC has to grant permission, on a case-by-case basis, to any station wishing to shut down analog before June 12. More than a third plan on changing on the 17th http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10161213-93.html It's easy to get the FCC "permission": "My transmitter/antenna/studio is broken!" As to who asked how many TV stations satellite stations would have to carry if they had to carry all local stations there are over 1600 TV stations in the US. That's more than all the channels on DISH Network and Direct TV combined. Do any in that count of "local stations" include cable "public access"? Thst's just OTA broacast, not cable. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural
Michigan, introduced a bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV channels in all US markets." There already exist regulations requiring CABLE companies to carry local TV channels, so the question should be, "Why does the government hate CATV and satellite service providers?" I disagree with your use of the word *hate*, but in essence what the government is trying to do is prevent unfair competition. Cable companies originally delivered the signals of *only* local stations. Nobody signed up for cable service to receive only *premium* programming. Today, however, the situation is different. In order to make an educated decision of whether or not it is unfair competition for cable and satellite providers not to provide local station feeds, you should first read what the local stations have to say. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Multiple Programming Providers | RA-5C | Satellite tvro | 15 | March 10th 05 09:27 PM |
| BEST SATELLITE SERVICE | Jack Dotson | High definition TV | 13 | November 15th 04 03:51 AM |
| HD satellite service in D/FW area question. | DJH | High definition TV | 1 | December 23rd 03 12:34 AM |