A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » High definition TV
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 15th 09, 09:31 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
JoeTheBlogger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

Thumper wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:54:23 -0500, "L Alpert"
wrote:

"JoeTheBlogger" wrote in message
...
KHudson wrote:
Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan,
introduced a
bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV
channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice
of
only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair
to
rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and
scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding
of
competition and what is fair

I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business,
PERIOD...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml
NO ACTUALLY THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY TO DUMOCratS HATE BUSINESS.

Democrats don't hate businesses, they just view them as a revenue
stream to feed more socialist programs.


Too bad that's not true.


IS TOO.
  #12  
Old February 16th 09, 05:32 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:55:14 -0600, Devil Dog wrote:

L Alpert wrote:

"JoeTheBlogger" wrote in message
...

KHudson wrote:

Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan,
introduced a
bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV
channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice
of
only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair
to
rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and
scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding
of
competition and what is fair

I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business,
PERIOD...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml

NO ACTUALLY THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY TO DUMOCratS HATE BUSINESS.



Democrats don't hate businesses, they just view them as a revenue
stream to feed more socialist programs.

I see the switch over date to digital has been changed (to stay on
topic)....


Yes but most of them are still going with February 17th date.


Too bad, changing it will not only cause more confusion, but cost many
stations a lot of money. In addition many were waiting for the high
UHF spectrum for public safety as well as interagency communications.



  #13  
Old February 16th 09, 07:01 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:27:09 -0500, Kimba W Lion
wrote:

Devil Dog wrote:

Yes but most of them are still going with February 17th date.


No, most are not. Plus, the FCC has to grant permission, on a case-by-case
basis, to any station wishing to shut down analog before June 12.


More than a third plan on changing on the 17th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10161213-93.html

As to who asked how many TV stations satellite stations would have to
carry if they had to carry all local stations there are over 1600 TV
stations in the US. That's more than all the channels on DISH Network
and Direct TV combined.



  #14  
Old February 16th 09, 03:32 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
RickMerrill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:27:09 -0500, Kimba W Lion
wrote:

Devil Dog wrote:

Yes but most of them are still going with February 17th date.

No, most are not. Plus, the FCC has to grant permission, on a case-by-case
basis, to any station wishing to shut down analog before June 12.


More than a third plan on changing on the 17th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10161213-93.html


It's easy to get the FCC "permission": "My transmitter/antenna/studio
is broken!"


As to who asked how many TV stations satellite stations would have to
carry if they had to carry all local stations there are over 1600 TV
stations in the US. That's more than all the channels on DISH Network
and Direct TV combined.


Do any in that count of "local stations" include cable "public access"?
  #15  
Old February 16th 09, 03:33 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
RickMerrill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

JoeTheBlogger wrote:
Thumper wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:54:23 -0500, "L Alpert"
wrote:

"JoeTheBlogger" wrote in message
...
KHudson wrote:
Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan, introduced a
bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV
channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice of
only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair to
rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and
scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding of
competition and what is fair

I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business,
PERIOD...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml
NO ACTUALLY THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY TO DUMOCratS HATE BUSINESS.
Democrats don't hate businesses, they just view them as a revenue
stream to feed more socialist programs.


Too bad that's not true.


IS TOO.


Is NOT!

[what a high level debate this has turned out to be!]

  #16  
Old February 16th 09, 03:35 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
RickMerrill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

Chill Out wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:21:49 -0800, KHudson wrote for every to trash:

Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan, introduced a
bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV
channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice of
only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair to
rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and
scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding of
competition and what is fair

I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business, PERIOD...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml

Keith
http://www.eBuyHD.com


There is a problem with local channels in rural zones. If you live
outside the Phoenix area you can't get Phoenix stations or your local
station by satellite. The DTV conversion might help but if you only
have 4 local channels you might get ABC, CBS and NBC but you probably
won't get PBS, MyTv or CW. Which explains why the Ghost Whisper is
still on the air.


The very rural stations may be LP (low power) stations - it works for
them because there is not much interference - and the LP stations do
NOT Have to convert to digital at all!


  #17  
Old February 16th 09, 04:57 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 205
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

On Feb 13, 8:21*am, KHudson wrote:
Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural Michigan, introduced a
bill to require Dish Network and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV
channels in all US markets. Stupak said that the current practice of
only carrying local channels for major population centers is unfair to
rural citizens. But Stupak seems to miss two important economic and
scientific factors against his wishes, as well as an understanding of
competition and what is fair

I think the REAL question is why does govenment hate business,
PERIOD...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/200...32053742.shtml

Keithhttp://www.eBuyHD.com


"Government hate business"?? Business RUNS the government.
  #18  
Old February 21st 09, 10:49 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:32:26 -0500, RickMerrill
wrote:

Roger (K8RI) wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:27:09 -0500, Kimba W Lion
wrote:

Devil Dog wrote:

Yes but most of them are still going with February 17th date.
No, most are not. Plus, the FCC has to grant permission, on a case-by-case
basis, to any station wishing to shut down analog before June 12.


More than a third plan on changing on the 17th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10161213-93.html


It's easy to get the FCC "permission": "My transmitter/antenna/studio
is broken!"


As to who asked how many TV stations satellite stations would have to
carry if they had to carry all local stations there are over 1600 TV
stations in the US. That's more than all the channels on DISH Network
and Direct TV combined.


Do any in that count of "local stations" include cable "public access"?


Thst's just OTA broacast, not cable.



  #19  
Old February 21st 09, 07:29 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 96
Default Why Does The Goverment Hate Satellite Service Providers?

"Earlier this week, Rep. Bart Stupak, from rural
Michigan, introduced a bill to require Dish Network
and DirecTV (SatTV) to carry local TV channels
in all US markets."


There already exist regulations requiring CABLE companies to carry local
TV channels, so the question should be, "Why does the government hate
CATV and satellite service providers?"

I disagree with your use of the word *hate*, but in essence what the
government is trying to do is prevent unfair competition. Cable
companies originally delivered the signals of *only* local stations.
Nobody signed up for cable service to receive only *premium*
programming. Today, however, the situation is different.

In order to make an educated decision of whether or not it is unfair
competition for cable and satellite providers not to provide local
station feeds, you should first read what the local stations have to
say.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiple Programming Providers RA-5C Satellite tvro 15 March 10th 05 09:27 PM
BEST SATELLITE SERVICE Jack Dotson High definition TV 13 November 15th 04 03:51 AM
HD satellite service in D/FW area question. DJH High definition TV 1 December 23rd 03 12:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.