A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » UK digital tv
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

BBC3 insults viewers once again with DOG **** reply



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old July 4th 08, 09:31 PM posted to rec.arts.drwho,uk.tech.digital-tv
The Doctor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 144
Default BBC3 insults viewers once again with DOG reply

In article ,
Adrian wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:

That's just as it should be. And in fact, many of the 'good' things done
under the auspices of organised religion are done for just that reason. It's
just that the religious organisation acts as a focus and brings like minded
people together. I can assure you that when our local church helps someone
out the individuals concerned aren't thinking of their reward in heaven;
they're just doing what their cultural background and personality has led
them to do. I think the cry "I'll get my reward in heaven!" is usually
spoken in jest!


My late Mother once told me that everything that everybody ever did was
for selfish reasons. When we do something good and "un-selfish", we do
it because either it makes us feel good to do it, or not doing so would
make us feel bad. The difference between good and bad people is in their
capacity to gain spiritually from being kind to others, and the extent
to which they feel guilty when their own actions hurt or deprive others.

Religion distorts this theory by adding the promise of reward or threat
of punishment in some form of afterlife, thereby keeping some people on
the "good" side of the fence, who might not otherwise have done. Of
course there is a tendency for conflict between any opposing groups of
people, which applies to religions as much as it does to nationality,
race, clour or the football teem you proffess to support. At the end of
the day, conflict is often IN THE NAME of religion, but I'm pretty sure
it's just an excuse for violent and intolerant people to be violent and
intolerent.

For what it's worth, I am atheist, but not evangelically so.

Adrian


Distortions are the lies of men.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is Ici
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!
  #142  
Old July 4th 08, 09:35 PM posted to rec.arts.drwho,uk.tech.digital-tv
Top Poster
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default BBC3 insults viewers once again with DOG reply

Like you

--
Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once
they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If
a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but
the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous


"The Doctor" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Adrian wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:

That's just as it should be. And in fact, many of the 'good' things

done
under the auspices of organised religion are done for just that reason.

It's
just that the religious organisation acts as a focus and brings like

minded
people together. I can assure you that when our local church helps

someone
out the individuals concerned aren't thinking of their reward in

heaven;
they're just doing what their cultural background and personality has

led
them to do. I think the cry "I'll get my reward in heaven!" is usually
spoken in jest!


My late Mother once told me that everything that everybody ever did was
for selfish reasons. When we do something good and "un-selfish", we do
it because either it makes us feel good to do it, or not doing so would
make us feel bad. The difference between good and bad people is in their
capacity to gain spiritually from being kind to others, and the extent
to which they feel guilty when their own actions hurt or deprive others.

Religion distorts this theory by adding the promise of reward or threat
of punishment in some form of afterlife, thereby keeping some people on
the "good" side of the fence, who might not otherwise have done. Of
course there is a tendency for conflict between any opposing groups of
people, which applies to religions as much as it does to nationality,
race, clour or the football teem you proffess to support. At the end of
the day, conflict is often IN THE NAME of religion, but I'm pretty sure
it's just an excuse for violent and intolerant people to be violent and
intolerent.

For what it's worth, I am atheist, but not evangelically so.

Adrian


Distortions are the lies of men.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is Ici
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
USA petition for dissolution of your nation!



  #143  
Old July 8th 08, 01:18 PM posted to rec.arts.drwho,uk.tech.digital-tv
Adrian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default BBC3 insults viewers once again with DOG reply

The Doctor wrote:
In article ,
Adrian wrote:
Bill Wright wrote:

That's just as it should be. And in fact, many of the 'good' things done
under the auspices of organised religion are done for just that reason. It's
just that the religious organisation acts as a focus and brings like minded
people together. I can assure you that when our local church helps someone
out the individuals concerned aren't thinking of their reward in heaven;
they're just doing what their cultural background and personality has led
them to do. I think the cry "I'll get my reward in heaven!" is usually
spoken in jest!

My late Mother once told me that everything that everybody ever did was
for selfish reasons. When we do something good and "un-selfish", we do
it because either it makes us feel good to do it, or not doing so would
make us feel bad. The difference between good and bad people is in their
capacity to gain spiritually from being kind to others, and the extent
to which they feel guilty when their own actions hurt or deprive others.

Religion distorts this theory by adding the promise of reward or threat
of punishment in some form of afterlife, thereby keeping some people on
the "good" side of the fence, who might not otherwise have done. Of
course there is a tendency for conflict between any opposing groups of
people, which applies to religions as much as it does to nationality,
race, clour or the football teem you proffess to support. At the end of
the day, conflict is often IN THE NAME of religion, but I'm pretty sure
it's just an excuse for violent and intolerant people to be violent and
intolerent.

For what it's worth, I am atheist, but not evangelically so.

Adrian


Distortions are the lies of men.


uh? do you think you could explain to a poor dumb limey what that is
supposed to mean, and what it is supposed to relate to?

Thanks

Adrian
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BBC3 Logo / DOG - standard reply Dave Walker UK digital tv 9 August 16th 05 11:55 PM
Reply from BBC BBC3 DOG Gripper UK digital tv 23 August 12th 05 03:18 AM
Why widescreen is shit. Donald McTrevor UK digital tv 35 May 20th 05 07:45 PM
holy shit! oscargrouch High definition TV 2 January 31st 05 05:30 AM
this is shit neil UK sky 3 October 30th 03 12:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.