![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#131
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:03:19 +0000, Edster wrote:
maffster wrote: On Mar 15, 1:25*pm, Roderick Stewart wrote: In article fb826f2f-b7e1-43aa-b77c- , Maffster wrote: Torchwood 2.8 on Three with DOG 2.7 million viewers. Torchwood 2.9 on Three with no DOG 2.4 million views. You could interpret this any way you like. Even if both these episodes were broadcast at the same time of day, they will have been on different days and lots of other factors could have influenced 0.3 million people not to watch episode 9. The weather could have been different, there could have been other more tempting programmes on offer, or those people might simply have found other things to do. A not inconsiderable influence will have been that some of those who chose not to watch episode 9 will already have seen episode 8 and thus formed an opinion of what to expect. Rod. Of course you could, and you are right. However Aggy is convinced that people are not watching because of the DOG and would return to watching BBC 3 if the DOG was dropped, but he has provided no evidence to support his claim. It would take an advertising campaign letting people know that the graffiti had been removed to attract viewers because of that. I stopped watching BBC3 when they started having advertising banners during programmes, and hadn't even looked at it until someone said they had made the logo solid pink. Removing the graffiti in secret will never get viewers like me back. Me too. M. |
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message ,
Kay Robinson Proclaimed from the tallest tower: SNIP! Nothing irritates me more than having to scroll through an entire thread full of posts to find the reply to the last paragraph. I still did it though...You could try a little trimming.. Kay There are few things that irritate me more than someone who copies a great chunk of text, then posts a meaningless post that does nothing to further the conversation... but I'm not complaining. :-) Seriously though, I'm sorry if I offended you by my trimless post! I do normally snip anything not relevant to my point, but on this occasion (and on a few others I expect) I forgot. Hope we haven't fallen out over it though!! :-) -- Regards, Chris. (Remove Elvis's shoes to email me) |
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Alun L. Palmer wrote: Kay Robinson wrote in : On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:24:49 +0000 (UTC), (The Doctor) sharpened a new quill and scratched: In article , Agamemnon wrote: You are the heretic. You deny Jesus Christ's omnipresence and omnipotence. You think his is impotent. And you believe that Jesus is not part of the Holy Trinity. He was a great bloke. Did lots of good work. If we all followed his example the world would be a much better place. The upsetting fact is that after he died a bunch of followers, encouraged by the only educated one among them, namely Paul aka Saul, decided to set up a bloody church and claim ownership. They and everything done since in the name of Jesus Christ has been an abomination and caused more wars, death and murder ever since. The solution, follow Jesus and not the church that uses his name. Go forth, love thy neighbour, do good and do no harm. Simple init.... Kay (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination. You're not wrong there, Kay, and I don't even believe in God. In Corinthians, Paul says to worship the Christ. -- Member - Liberal International This is Ici God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! USA petition for dissolution of your nation! |
|
#135
|
|||
|
|||
|
Would you believe a Jew
-- Socrates taught his students that the pursuit of truth can only begin once they start to question and analyze every belief that they ever held dear. If a certain belief passes the tests of evidence, deduction, and logic, it should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief should not only be discarded, but the thinker must also then question why he was led to believe the erroneous "The Doctor" wrote in message ... In article , Alun L. Palmer wrote: Kay Robinson wrote in : On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:24:49 +0000 (UTC), (The Doctor) sharpened a new quill and scratched: In article , Agamemnon wrote: You are the heretic. You deny Jesus Christ's omnipresence and omnipotence. You think his is impotent. And you believe that Jesus is not part of the Holy Trinity. He was a great bloke. Did lots of good work. If we all followed his example the world would be a much better place. The upsetting fact is that after he died a bunch of followers, encouraged by the only educated one among them, namely Paul aka Saul, decided to set up a bloody church and claim ownership. They and everything done since in the name of Jesus Christ has been an abomination and caused more wars, death and murder ever since. The solution, follow Jesus and not the church that uses his name. Go forth, love thy neighbour, do good and do no harm. Simple init.... Kay (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination. You're not wrong there, Kay, and I don't even believe in God. In Corinthians, Paul says to worship the Christ. -- Member - Liberal International This is Ici God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! USA petition for dissolution of your nation! |
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
|
And you believe that Jesus is not part of the Holy Trinity.
He was a great bloke. Did lots of good work. If we all followed his example the world would be a much better place. The upsetting fact is that after he died a bunch of followers, encouraged by the only educated one among them, namely Paul aka Saul, decided to set up a bloody church and claim ownership. They and everything done since in the name of Jesus Christ has been an abomination and caused more wars, death and murder ever since. Not everything. The various Christian churches are a massive force for good in the world. Despite the various wars and persecutions I'm sure the balance is heavily towards 'good' and away from 'evil'. The reason is that millions of Christians quietly get on with the task of easing humanity's path through this world, as they always have. I'm an atheist and I used to be very much against organised religion, but I've come to realise how much good is gone in the name of religion. Bill |
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Wright" wrote in message ... And you believe that Jesus is not part of the Holy Trinity. He was a great bloke. Did lots of good work. If we all followed his example the world would be a much better place. The upsetting fact is that after he died a bunch of followers, encouraged by the only educated one among them, namely Paul aka Saul, decided to set up a bloody church and claim ownership. They and everything done since in the name of Jesus Christ has been an abomination and caused more wars, death and murder ever since. Not everything. The various Christian churches are a massive force for good in the world. Despite the various wars and persecutions I'm sure the balance is heavily towards 'good' and away from 'evil'. The reason is that millions of Christians quietly get on with the task of easing humanity's path through this world, as they always have. I'm an atheist and I used to be very much against organised religion, but I've come to realise how much good is gone in the name of religion. I've come across Christian organisations that do "good" things in the name of charity, but there are hidden catches. E.g. they help people on the condition that they read the Bible each day. I've come across people who do good things because they think it will score them brownie points with Jesus. Good things are done in the name of religion. So are bad things. If something good is done, why does it need to be done in the name of anything? If I donate to charity, I don't do so in the name of any religion, politics or any other club. I don't do it to score points with some deity, and I don't do it on condition that religion is credited, involved or pushed down anyone's throat. I do it because I want to. Personally, I avoid charities that have any kind of religious association. Because I just feel that half the time they're not inclusive, they're blowing their own trumpet, and their pious attitudes are less than genuine. |
|
#138
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stephen Wilson" wrote in message ... Not everything. The various Christian churches are a massive force for good in the world. Despite the various wars and persecutions I'm sure the balance is heavily towards 'good' and away from 'evil'. The reason is that millions of Christians quietly get on with the task of easing humanity's path through this world, as they always have. I'm an atheist and I used to be very much against organised religion, but I've come to realise how much good is gone in the name of religion. I've come across Christian organisations that do "good" things in the name of charity, but there are hidden catches. E.g. they help people on the condition that they read the Bible each day. Yes. See the early scenes of Major Barbara for Shaw's biting satire on this aspect of religion. I've come across people who do good things because they think it will score them brownie points with Jesus. Yes, well organised religion has always held out the promise of salvation. The fact is, the promise of an afterlife has helped many people, although it has also been a means of social control. Heaven might be a plecebo but it's effective medicine! Good things are done in the name of religion. So are bad things. If something good is done, why does it need to be done in the name of anything? If I donate to charity, I don't do so in the name of any religion, politics or any other club. I don't do it to score points with some deity, and I don't do it on condition that religion is credited, involved or pushed down anyone's throat. I do it because I want to. That's just as it should be. And in fact, many of the 'good' things done under the auspices of organised religion are done for just that reason. It's just that the religious organisation acts as a focus and brings like minded people together. I can assure you that when our local church helps someone out the individuals concerned aren't thinking of their reward in heaven; they're just doing what their cultural background and personality has led them to do. I think the cry "I'll get my reward in heaven!" is usually spoken in jest! Bill |
|
#139
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Doctor wrote:
In article , Alun L. Palmer wrote: Kay Robinson wrote in : On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:24:49 +0000 (UTC), (The Doctor) sharpened a new quill and scratched: In article , Agamemnon wrote: You are the heretic. You deny Jesus Christ's omnipresence and omnipotence. You think his is impotent. And you believe that Jesus is not part of the Holy Trinity. He was a great bloke. Did lots of good work. If we all followed his example the world would be a much better place. The upsetting fact is that after he died a bunch of followers, encouraged by the only educated one among them, namely Paul aka Saul, decided to set up a bloody church and claim ownership. They and everything done since in the name of Jesus Christ has been an abomination and caused more wars, death and murder ever since. The solution, follow Jesus and not the church that uses his name. Go forth, love thy neighbour, do good and do no harm. Simple init.... Kay (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination. You're not wrong there, Kay, and I don't even believe in God. In Corinthians, Paul says to worship the Christ. Which completely validates what she was saying - that it was Paul, not Jesus. |
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Wright wrote:
That's just as it should be. And in fact, many of the 'good' things done under the auspices of organised religion are done for just that reason. It's just that the religious organisation acts as a focus and brings like minded people together. I can assure you that when our local church helps someone out the individuals concerned aren't thinking of their reward in heaven; they're just doing what their cultural background and personality has led them to do. I think the cry "I'll get my reward in heaven!" is usually spoken in jest! My late Mother once told me that everything that everybody ever did was for selfish reasons. When we do something good and "un-selfish", we do it because either it makes us feel good to do it, or not doing so would make us feel bad. The difference between good and bad people is in their capacity to gain spiritually from being kind to others, and the extent to which they feel guilty when their own actions hurt or deprive others. Religion distorts this theory by adding the promise of reward or threat of punishment in some form of afterlife, thereby keeping some people on the "good" side of the fence, who might not otherwise have done. Of course there is a tendency for conflict between any opposing groups of people, which applies to religions as much as it does to nationality, race, clour or the football teem you proffess to support. At the end of the day, conflict is often IN THE NAME of religion, but I'm pretty sure it's just an excuse for violent and intolerant people to be violent and intolerent. For what it's worth, I am atheist, but not evangelically so. Adrian |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BBC3 Logo / DOG - standard reply | Dave Walker | UK digital tv | 9 | August 16th 05 11:55 PM |
| Reply from BBC BBC3 DOG | Gripper | UK digital tv | 23 | August 12th 05 03:18 AM |
| Why widescreen is shit. | Donald McTrevor | UK digital tv | 35 | May 20th 05 07:45 PM |
| holy shit! | oscargrouch | High definition TV | 2 | January 31st 05 05:30 AM |
| this is shit | neil | UK sky | 3 | October 30th 03 12:34 AM |