![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me what offsets are being used on each of the digital multiplexes from Crystal Palace ? I can't believe how difficult it is to find this information, so any links would be great. Thanks in advance, UKM |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jun 20, 9:04*am, Mark Carver wrote:
wrote: Hi All, Can anyone tell me what offsets are being used on each of the digital multiplexes from Crystal Palace ? I can't believe how difficult it is to find this information, so any links would be great. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/reception_advice/digital_trans_guide/s... Great, Thanks for this Mark. I looked on there before, so why is their seach enginge so pants ? UKM |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:04:14 +0100, Mark Carver
wrote: wrote: Hi All, Can anyone tell me what offsets are being used on each of the digital multiplexes from Crystal Palace ? I can't believe how difficult it is to find this information, so any links would be great. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/reception_advice/digital_trans_guide/show_transmitter.asp-siteID=66.html Just as a matter of interest, why is the channel offset by 167 kHz anyway and why only one out of six? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 20/06/2008 20:24, Scott wrote:
Mark Carver wrote: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/reception_advice/digital_trans_guide/show_transmitter.asp-siteID=66.html Just as a matter of interest, why is the channel offset by 167 kHz anyway and why only one out of six? From Crystal Palace, five muxes have negative offset, one has positive offset, none have zero. It's different from other transmitters, e.g. Waltham has all zero http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/recep...siteID=60.html |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:42:12 +0100, Andy Burns
wrote: On 20/06/2008 20:24, Scott wrote: Mark Carver wrote: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/reception_advice/digital_trans_guide/show_transmitter.asp-siteID=66.html Just as a matter of interest, why is the channel offset by 167 kHz anyway and why only one out of six? From Crystal Palace, five muxes have negative offset, one has positive offset, none have zero. It's different from other transmitters, e.g. Waltham has all zero http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/recep...siteID=60.html I see. I missed the - sign. Still don't know what offset is or does. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scott wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:42:12 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: On 20/06/2008 20:24, Scott wrote: Mark Carver wrote: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/reception_advice/digital_trans_guide/show_transmitter.asp-siteID=66.html Just as a matter of interest, why is the channel offset by 167 kHz anyway and why only one out of six? From Crystal Palace, five muxes have negative offset, one has positive offset, none have zero. It's different from other transmitters, e.g. Waltham has all zero http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/recep...siteID=60.html I see. I missed the - sign. Still don't know what offset is or does. The offset is if the digital carrier is adjacent to an analogue channel. If the digital carrier is the channel below the analogue then the offset is -167kHz but if the digital carrier is above the analogue then the offset is +167. It's to stop the analogue carrier from interfering with the Digital carrier. Might also be to do with the stability of the output frequency of the analogue transmitter and tolerances of the same. This why modulators in sky boxes and VCR's etc shouldn't be tuned to a channel next to a digital carrier. It can cause breakup on DTT. Glenn... |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Glenn Millar wrote:
Scott wrote: I see. I missed the - sign. Still don't know what offset is or does. It's just an offset of the centre frequency of the digital transmission above or below the centre frequency of the TV channel. For example a DTT transmission on UHF channel 21 with zero offset would be centred on 474.000 MHz (±500 Hz). With a positive offset the signal would be centred on 474.167 MHz. Where used, the offset is always 1/6 of a MHz, so is described completely by a single character (-, + or 0). The offset is if the digital carrier is adjacent to an analogue channel. If the digital carrier is the channel below the analogue then the offset is -167kHz but if the digital carrier is above the analogue then the offset is +167. Except that -ve offsets are never used on ch. 21, nor +ve offsets on ch. 68. There are strict out-of-band spectrum masks to meet. It's to stop the analogue carrier from interfering with the Digital carrier. That's a bit vague. DTT offsets are used to ease the filtering requirements at transmitter outputs where there is adjacent channel working with analogue and where shared transmitting aerials are used. Might also be to do with the stability of the output frequency of the analogue transmitter and tolerances of the same. Well analogue uses offsets too, to reduce the visibility of co-channel interference. Here the offset value is smaller, viz. 5/3 times line scan rate (~21 kHz). With an analogue transmission with +ve offset on channel N there'd be almost zero space between the upper edge of the NICAM component of the analogue signal and the lowest COFDM carrier of a DTT signal on channel N+1, unless the DTT is offset upwards. This why modulators in sky boxes and VCR's etc shouldn't be tuned to a channel next to a digital carrier. It can cause breakup on DTT. These modulators are double-sideband, so you obviously don't want one N+1 relative to DTT, but I don't see why N-1 would be a problem. The main thing is to ensure the modulator's not co-channel with any DTT, otherwise your distributed Sky RF-2 signal will look a bit noisy. . . -- Andy |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:13:03 +0100, Andy Wade
wrote: Glenn Millar wrote: Scott wrote: I see. I missed the - sign. Still don't know what offset is or does. It's just an offset of the centre frequency of the digital transmission above or below the centre frequency of the TV channel. For example a DTT transmission on UHF channel 21 with zero offset would be centred on 474.000 MHz (±500 Hz). With a positive offset the signal would be centred on 474.167 MHz. Where used, the offset is always 1/6 of a MHz, so is described completely by a single character (-, + or 0). The offset is if the digital carrier is adjacent to an analogue channel. If the digital carrier is the channel below the analogue then the offset is -167kHz but if the digital carrier is above the analogue then the offset is +167. Except that -ve offsets are never used on ch. 21, nor +ve offsets on ch. 68. There are strict out-of-band spectrum masks to meet. It's to stop the analogue carrier from interfering with the Digital carrier. That's a bit vague. DTT offsets are used to ease the filtering requirements at transmitter outputs where there is adjacent channel working with analogue and where shared transmitting aerials are used. Might also be to do with the stability of the output frequency of the analogue transmitter and tolerances of the same. Well analogue uses offsets too, to reduce the visibility of co-channel interference. Here the offset value is smaller, viz. 5/3 times line scan rate (~21 kHz). With an analogue transmission with +ve offset on channel N there'd be almost zero space between the upper edge of the NICAM component of the analogue signal and the lowest COFDM carrier of a DTT signal on channel N+1, unless the DTT is offset upwards. This why modulators in sky boxes and VCR's etc shouldn't be tuned to a channel next to a digital carrier. It can cause breakup on DTT. These modulators are double-sideband, so you obviously don't want one N+1 relative to DTT, but I don't see why N-1 would be a problem. The main thing is to ensure the modulator's not co-channel with any DTT, otherwise your distributed Sky RF-2 signal will look a bit noisy. . . Does this mean they will end with analogue switch-off? Will the decoders in affected areas need a rescan even if the channel numbers on paper remain the same? |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is my terrestrial aerial of any use? | Eddy Bentley | UK digital tv | 1 | August 15th 07 12:46 PM |
| Digital terrestrial help please | Bob Smith | UK digital tv | 10 | December 20th 06 11:02 PM |
| 11 ghz Terrestrial Transmission | I McD | UK digital tv | 2 | September 16th 06 11:38 AM |
| HELP Terrestrial-TV vs. Digital-TV | KevinGPO | UK digital tv | 23 | January 10th 06 04:36 PM |
| TMS and terrestrial cricket | Richard Watkinson | UK digital tv | 6 | September 27th 05 10:24 PM |