![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 2, 1:12*pm, "Peter H. Coffin" wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 04:14:59 -0700 (PDT), wrote: The other experimental results listed on the discussion page support my conclusions well, by indicating higher measurement for human resistance, and calling out problems with the main article text that would exaggerate lethality with regard to fibrillation. The values in the article are not more wrong then your numbers are and I have no doubt you actually measured those values. Contact resistance will frequently play a major role in shock hazards. In your measurement, I'm betting you pinched the probes with your left and right hand (probably reasonble hard based on the closeness of the wet and dry values). Try making the measurements again, but this time get 2 pieces metal and grab them with each hand allowing the probe to touch the metal. The contact area of your skin is now much larger to the conductor path and the measurement will be considerably less. I got curious enough with the 'pure water is an insulator' possibility that I did run an experiment myself. I took two chunks of copper, one in each hand to measure my body resistance, it came to 88K. I put about 1/4 oz of DI water on my hands (I work in an electronics lab); repeated and I got 8.1K. So while we will both agree that DI water is an excellent insulator, it can impact electrocution likelyhood. If I had though if it, I should have cleaned both my hand and the copper with alchohol. I will speculate that removal of comtaminants will increase the resistive path, but I don't think it will get you even half way back to the waterless event. UL/CSA and the IEC use 2K as the human body resistance. There can always be an argument weather this should be higher or lower, but it is reasonable in my mind considering human safety is involved. If you can imagine someone reaching out from a pool, with his chest against the earth edging and grabbing with both hands an aluminum pool skimmer that had the bad fortune to have become live, the path through the heart will almost surely be below the 1K number. I will further speculate that the use of a DVM is not a good way to accurately measure human body resistance. Measuring the current through you having a +12V applied would probably be more accurate. While the likelyhood is still low at +12V, it is possible that you can concoct a scenario where this would be lethal (the pool example above). |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 3, 1:14*am, w_tom wrote:
On Apr 2, 7:51 pm, (Scott Lurndal) wrote: It's already been pointed out to you at least three times that the TIVO power supply is fed from mains voltages (NA 120V, ROW 240V), which can be quite hazardous. * Do you read or just assume what I posted? Yes, we have read what you posted. Have you ever seen the inside of a Tivo? It uses an open frame power supply (at least mine does). If the cover is off a tivo, there is high (well, 200 ish volts anyways) right there. * Using an ice pack to isolate failures on a motherboard is not hazardous. * I work in a lab where we work in mixed environment (high and low voltage boards) all the time. Since I work with comptetnt people, I would never expect to see such foolhardy behavior as allowing water to be present while debugging one of these boards. If I did see it, I would give a royal reaming to the inept person doing it. * Common knowledge now posted a fourth time. *Same basic knowledge that also makes obvious "no hazardous voltages exist on a motherboard". Yes, we agree with that. 12V and below is pretty safe. I still won't work on it with wet hands. There is anectdotal evidence that with the right conditions 12V can be lethal. * Amazing how many have posted fears without learning the basics. Scott did not read disk drive datasheets to somehow know 140 degrees must be destructive. *Scott did not have basic electronics knowledge to know why water would not cause digital electronics harm - even to digital electronics of 1960s vintge. * * Scott demonstrateds why more than 50% of employees in the Silicon Valley are now immigrants. *Too many somehow know - do not understand how to first learn basic facts. No, actually you have demostrated quite well the expertise of many foreign workers. I assume you are asian on your english. Drive temperatures come up periodically, and everyone (even our resident troll) agrees cooler is better for the life of a hard drive and this is particularly important in a DVR where it runs 24/7. Spend some time researching projected HDD life at 30, 40 and 60C and let me know what you find. Can you cite a source that 50% of silicon valley is foreigners? We have been losing american engineers here and having foreign nationals cycle through the organization. They come on board with a very poor background, spend about 18 months learning the ropes, then go back. It's a shame the US government allows this to happen, but hey, that's globalization. The Japanese can be OK, the tiawanese are not so good; it will be 10+ years before the chinese can figure out how to design anything. |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 3, 7:17 am, wrote:
No, actually you have demostrated quite well the expertise of many foreign workers. I assume you are asian on your english. Ever take a technical writing course? English used in technical writing is different from that taught to English majors who are taught to personalize. In good technical prose, wording should be so impersonal that emotional types might even take insult. We also would not use ice packs on ICs. We use freeze spray - and rarely. However, the engineer that innovates must use what is available. An ice pack to cool selective parts on a Tivo does not create human risk AND does not threaten electronic life expectancy. Water on digital electronics does not harm anything. Water drops from an ice pack are even less problematic. But a high paid tech must use freeze spray so that time and money is not wasted drying the board. Where is a recommendation of running a disk drive constantly at 60 degree C? Why write about what is not stated or relevant here? Why confuse diagnostics with actual Tivo operation? Did you remember the point of every post? OP needs diagnostic solutions. Please remember the context; instead address the OP's problem. Any disk drive will work just fine at 140 degree F. It may only work for 9.6 years instead of 10 at that temperature. Irrelevant? Did you forget the context? 1) Heat is a diagnostic tool. 2) Disk driver is not part of the problem; need not be heated to identify a failure. OP must locate a hardware failure. Why are posts so irresponsible as to discuss electrocution from 12 volts and total destruction of the world because a disk drive is at 140 degrees? Irresponsible. Those threats do not exist AND are completely irrelevant to solving the OP's problem. Diagnostics never recommended heating a drive to 140 degrees. That was another post creating hypothetical myths only to create argument. If that post was based in technical knowledge or in what was previously posted, then no disk drive was being heated to 140 degrees. But that poster had so little technical grasp as to think a drive at 140 degrees gets destroyed. Heating a disk drive to 140 degrees is acceptable wherever the person is using a technical brain - not throwing grenades into a discussion. Disk drive is but another example of posters who don't understand basic technology, do not bother to first read datasheets, did not comprehend what was posted, and cannot even remember the topic. Disk drive has nothing to do with the OP's problem - as this author stated up front. Why argue silliness? Every post about myths - disk drive destroyed by 140 degrees, electrocution from a motherboard, fear of rare water drops from an icepack - is not relevant to solving the OP's problem. Amazing how many fears and myths were posted that do not even apply to the OP's problem. Amazing how many posted while completely ignoring previous posts: Do not use a finger to find hot parts on a power supply since that supply will have 300 volt charges Why use that poor English that is not acceptable when writing technical prose? Well, many don't understand a difference between how to talk to a wife verses how to write impersonal and technical. I am surprised that one using too many personalized sentences (poor English) would be critical of good technical English. A Silicon Valley joke: IC is not integrated circuits. Indian and Chinese who, according the EE Times and other sources, now constitute 50% of the valley employees. One need only read the many silly posts here about electrocution from 12 volts to appreciate why America needs so many immigrants. Every post about Tivo motherboard electrocution identifies a poster who is in total denial of basic electrical facts. Nothing on that motherboard will electrocute anyone. Why so many posts advocating myths? A serious problem in America also demonstrates why so many also believed myths about Saddam's WMDs - when facts and numbers said otherwise. Appreciate why so many would also believe those WMD myths. How many are so foolish as to argue that 12 volts can kill? Blunt, technical, and now personally challenging the intellectual grasp of some here who do nothing to help solve the OP's problem. So many posters who do not even understand 'context'. |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article 19f7705c-4a32-48a5-bfef-fff8053db405
@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com, says... |On Apr 2, 6:14 am, wrote: | We can agree to disagree on what we each think is safe. | | Meanwhile, industry standards consider voltages under 50 as safe. | I thought it was current, or amperage that killed, not voltage ??? |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:15:39 GMT, Steven Stone wrote:
In article 19f7705c-4a32-48a5-bfef-fff8053db405 @m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com, says... |On Apr 2, 6:14 am, wrote: | We can agree to disagree on what we each think is safe. | | Meanwhile, industry standards consider voltages under 50 as safe. | I thought it was current, or amperage that killed, not voltage ??? 50 volts genreally can't push enough amps through you to kill you. It's like you're saying "I thought it was the wetness of water that kills, not the depth" when someone's saying it's really tough to drown in 3cm of water. -- A way of life that is odd or even erratic but interferes with no rights or interests of others is not to be condemned because it is different. -- Chief Justice Warren E. Burger |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:35:31 -0700 (PDT) w_tom wrote:
wt Every post about Tivo motherboard electrocution identifies a poster wt who is in total denial of basic electrical facts. Nothing on that wt motherboard will electrocute anyone. Why so many posts advocating wt myths? .... wt How many are so foolish as to argue that 12 volts can kill? Oh, 12 V will easily kill you if the wattage is right and it hits the heart. Alternating the current is also a factor since it will interfere with the regularly scheduled heartbeats, by the way. Whether the Tivo in particular is dangerous is not the point, but I will note that if any working device has AC coming in from the wall, at least the transformer is dangerous, even if you think the device is off. I once melted a piece of a flat-head screwdriver's tip off when I poked inside a computer that appeared to be off. It was a very memorable lesson. Please don't mislead people into getting hurt. If you're trolling, it's stupid to endanger someone's life for fun. See http://pchem.scs.uiuc.edu/pchemlab/electric.htm for more about the dangers of electrical currents. Ted |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 4, 10:31 am, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
Oh, 12 V will easily kill you if the wattage is right and it hits the heart. Alternating the current is also a factor since it will interfere with the regularly scheduled heartbeats, by the way. Whether the Tivo in particular is dangerous is not the point, but I will note that if any working device has AC coming in from the wall, at least the transformer is dangerous, even if you think the device is off. Did you read previous posts before posting myths? If 12 volts kills, a largest 12 volt current source massacres unsuspecting mechanics. You have just proven a car battery will electrocute humans. At what point will the technically naive stop posting this myth. There is no 'transformer'. Ted also should have learned this before posting. Ted, this is reposted only because you *know* and you post without first reading: Do not use a finger to find hot parts on a power supply since that supply will have 300 volt charges Ted - never jump start a car. As you so well know, that 12 volt battery will electrocute you. It will not electrocute anyone else. Others are immune because they read and learn before posting. Sorry Ted - you are being used as an example of so many here who forget to learn basic electrical concepts and don't bother to first read the thread. You are not the only one. Steven Stone also posted a question already asked and answered. Another poster who does not read the thread and never answers the OP's questions. No dangerous voltages exist on a Tivo motherboard. Anyone believing otherwise should post elsewhere. Responsible posters provide Peter Bogiatzidis with solutions for a Tivo problem. For example, where is a Tivo's temperature sensor? Based upon technical knowledge displayed here, I expect no one will answer his question. But lookout! Automobile batteries routinely electrocute people. Ted, et al tells us. Therefore it must be true. |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:00:20 -0700 (PDT) w_tom wrote:
wt On Apr 4, 10:31 am, Ted Zlatanov wrote: Oh, 12 V will easily kill you if the wattage is right and it hits the heart. Alternating the current is also a factor since it will interfere with the regularly scheduled heartbeats, by the way. Whether the Tivo in particular is dangerous is not the point, but I will note that if any working device has AC coming in from the wall, at least the transformer is dangerous, even if you think the device is off. wt Did you read previous posts before posting myths? If 12 volts kills, wt a largest 12 volt current source massacres unsuspecting mechanics. wt You have just proven a car battery will electrocute humans. At what wt point will the technically naive stop posting this myth. Note I said "if the wattage is right and it hits the heart." The body's resistance is normally too high to cause this situation, but if you like you can calculate the resistance of blood across the heart to convince yourself a lethal current could be delivered at 12V. I agree that under normal circumstances, 12V are harmless, but I also think it's a very bad idea to encourage people to poke inside consumer electronics (icepacks, really?) without the cautionary statements that you dislike. wt Ted - never jump start a car. As you so well know, that 12 volt wt battery will electrocute you. It will not electrocute anyone else. wt Others are immune because they read and learn before posting. wt Automobile batteries routinely electrocute people. Ted, et al tells wt us. Therefore it must be true. I didn't say any of that. Please don't put words in my mouth. Car batteries have no interest in delivering current through the person. It's still not a good idea to screw around with car batteries because of the risk of explosion (the acid can blow in your face, for instance), but you're not likely to get electrocuted at least. Ted |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 7, 12:24 pm, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
Note I said "if the wattage is right and it hits the heart." The body's resistance is normally too high to cause this situation, but if you like you can calculate the resistance of blood across the heart to convince yourself a lethal current could be delivered at 12V. I agree that under normal circumstances, 12V are harmless, but I also think it's a very bad idea to encourage people to poke inside consumer electronics (icepacks, really?) without the cautionary statements that you dislike. Any post about electrocution by a Tivo motherboard using a damp icepack is ... at what point does the word "context" have any meaning? Your post again hypes fear of something not dangerous AND provides the OP with no useful information. So you post same irrelevance again? Notice how many are killed uselessly by something with hundreds of times more wattage. We are told to never jump start a wet car due to thousands killed by wetness and that high power. Oh. The annual death count is zero? No such warning exists? People routinely jump start cars in the rain? Funny how myths get started once someone forgets reality and does not bother to learn facts. A damp icepack touching a Tvio motherboard will not electrocute anyone and will not harm Tivo electronics. Ted - please stop hyping fear, promoting junk science, and ignoroing context - the OPs problem. |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:25:34 -0700 (PDT) w_tom wrote:
wt On Apr 7, 12:24 pm, Ted Zlatanov wrote: Note I said "if the wattage is right and it hits the heart." The body's resistance is normally too high to cause this situation, but if you like you can calculate the resistance of blood across the heart to convince yourself a lethal current could be delivered at 12V. I agree that under normal circumstances, 12V are harmless, but I also think it's a very bad idea to encourage people to poke inside consumer electronics (icepacks, really?) without the cautionary statements that you dislike. wt Any post about electrocution by a Tivo motherboard using a damp wt icepack is ... at what point does the word "context" have any wt meaning? Your post again hypes fear of something not dangerous AND wt provides the OP with no useful information. So you post same wt irrelevance again? wt Notice how many are killed uselessly by something with hundreds of wt times more wattage. We are told to never jump start a wet car due to wt thousands killed by wetness and that high power. Oh. The annual wt death count is zero? No such warning exists? People routinely jump wt start cars in the rain? Funny how myths get started once someone wt forgets reality and does not bother to learn facts. A damp icepack wt touching a Tvio motherboard will not electrocute anyone and will not wt harm Tivo electronics. Ted - please stop hyping fear, promoting junk wt science, and ignoroing context - the OPs problem. I'm tired of arguing with things I didn't say, and of restating what I did say. You keep bringing up topics I didn't to promote your own argument (straw man arguments): car battery electrocution and dangers of the 12V from the Tivo motherboard. You're welcome to do it, but don't tell *me* I'm hyping fear or junk science. Prove to me that: 1) 12V across the heart will not generate enough current to kill a person. You can calculate the resistance of a saline solution across 50cm at 23 degrees celsius for the purposes of this exercise, unless you can stab yourself with probes deeply enough (I'll allow it). I include my original statement for your reference: "Oh, 12 V will easily kill you if the wattage is right and it hits the heart. Alternating the current is also a factor since it will interfere with the regularly scheduled heartbeats, by the way." 2) I ever said there was a danger from the Tivo motherboard. I include my original statement for your reference: "Whether the Tivo in particular is dangerous is not the point, but I will note that if any working device has AC coming in from the wall, at least the transformer is dangerous, even if you think the device is off." I *still* think your advice is cavalier and your disregard for cautionary statements is troubling. I'm not the only one, apparently. That's why I posted originally, and I think (2) is relevant to the discussion though you don't. (1) was an aside, and if you don't like it, too bad and welcome to Usenet. Ted |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tivo Series 1,2, and 3... Bugs in Series 3... | Jim | High definition TV | 0 | June 22nd 07 02:27 AM |
| Will Series 2 remote work with Philips Series 1 Tivo? | [email protected] | Tivo personal television | 2 | October 24th 06 05:46 PM |
| Series 2 Harddrive in a Series 1 tivo? | Upallnight | Tivo personal television | 2 | February 4th 04 07:22 PM |
| Upgraded Tivo Series One versus Series Two | No Spam Please | Tivo personal television | 1 | December 22nd 03 04:57 AM |
| Series 2 drive in a series 1 Tivo? | Michael Albrecht | Tivo personal television | 2 | August 9th 03 03:24 AM |