![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there a minimum quality level for Cable TV, or is it the lowest they can
get away with? I've just started watching TCM on Virginmedia and the quality is absymal. Most of the time I can clearly see the 8x8 compression blocks even when there's no motion. It's like watching youtube. It completely ruins the movies. -- Bart |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Edster
writes "Bartc" wrote: Is there a minimum quality level for Cable TV, or is it the lowest they can get away with? I've just started watching TCM on Virginmedia and the quality is absymal. Most of the time I can clearly see the 8x8 compression blocks even when there's no motion. It's like watching youtube. It completely ruins the movies. They re-encode what they get from Sky, which is already low quality. I thought that last night's DTT 'Hotel Babylon' (BBC1) was very jerky (although not blocky). It took me a while to get used to it. Low bit rate, or even transcoded from NTSC? -- Ian |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bartc" wrote in message
news ![]() Is there a minimum quality level for Cable TV, or is it the lowest they can get away with? Ding -- Alex "I laugh in the face of danger , then I hide until it goes away" |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The unfortunte truth is that (pretty much) all UK channels broadcast
from MPEG2 streams rather than tape - and the stream is a rather lower bitrate than most of us would accept given the choice. Once you add in DTT or sat transmission and you have some highly unsatisfactory pictures. Maybe they just want us all to upgrade to HD?... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dubba" wrote in message
... The unfortunte truth is that (pretty much) all UK channels broadcast from MPEG2 streams rather than tape - and the stream is a rather lower bitrate than most of us would accept given the choice. Once you add in DTT or sat transmission and you have some highly unsatisfactory pictures. Maybe they just want us all to upgrade to HD?... Will this be high resolution, low bitrate so about the "real" resolution as analogue - or am I just too untrusting ;-). Paul DS |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The controversy of High. Def. bitrates. | Lyrik[_2_] | High definition TV | 3 | January 15th 08 12:04 AM |
| Broadcast bitrates not the problem | John Russell | UK digital tv | 6 | June 20th 04 01:59 PM |
| Sky audio bitrates | Mungo | UK digital tv | 3 | October 14th 03 01:50 PM |
| DV cameras - bitrates etc. | Martin Angove | UK digital tv | 1 | September 16th 03 05:50 PM |
| Some Freeview bitrates | Dave Gibson | UK digital tv | 36 | September 3rd 03 08:47 PM |