![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? I'd say the losses of the transformer likely to outweigh any gains. RF transformers are very good, they have come on a great deal in the past few years. Losses of 1dB are easily achieved at 100 MHz with transformers from Mini-Circuits or Coilcraft. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Ian Jackson wrote: In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes In article , J G Miller wrote: I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? I'd say the losses of the transformer likely to outweigh any gains. Exactly. In any case, it's highly unlikely that the receiver input IS a very good 50 ohms (an/or that the aerial feed is a very good 75 ohms). Just plug it in, and use it. Also, if the aerial feed happens to be fitted with a 75 ohm BNC, that will mate OK with the receiver's 50 ohm BNC. but you may never get a good contact with a 50 ohm connector again (you may not want to). With many makes the centre pin on the 75 ohm version is thicker than on the 50 ohm one. -- From KT24 - in "Leafy Surrey" Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , m.t6
writes Ashley Booth wrote: I have tried several Web searches but have not found anything appropriate, perhaps because I am not using the correct search terms, so can anybody provide help with the following problem. I have a radio receiver with a 50 ohm impedance BNC input. I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? Try Mini-circuits. http://www.minicircuits.com/products/imps_main.html Oops. I've linked to Pads, but they also do RF transformers. Failing that you can always look around for a old spectrum analyser converter, but they usually have N type connectors rather than BNC. Just connect it direct and see if it works to your satisfaction. IMHO it's not worth matching the small impedance mismatch for a radio receiver. I use a 50/75 Ohm matching pad (Mini-circuits) on my spectrum analyser but that has a 5.7dB loss. Not what you need on an antenna i/p! I assumed that J.G Miller was already using the receiver and wanted to give a impedance matched system a go. Sometimes it is better to have a matched system with a couple of dB worth of loss. Remember filters only work properly with the correct impedances on the input and output. If he has a circuit diagram, and he might be able to modify the RF stages to suite his needs, but not everybody has the skill to do that. Completely OTT. Except for very specialized applications (none of which I have ever yet come across), it isn't going to make a scrap of difference. Just plug the aerial feed in, and use it. -- Ian |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , charles
writes In article , Ian Jackson wrote: In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes In article , J G Miller wrote: I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? I'd say the losses of the transformer likely to outweigh any gains. Exactly. In any case, it's highly unlikely that the receiver input IS a very good 50 ohms (an/or that the aerial feed is a very good 75 ohms). Just plug it in, and use it. Also, if the aerial feed happens to be fitted with a 75 ohm BNC, that will mate OK with the receiver's 50 ohm BNC. but you may never get a good contact with a 50 ohm connector again (you may not want to). With many makes the centre pin on the 75 ohm version is thicker than on the 50 ohm one. With BNCs, I've never found that a 75 ohm male a 50 ohm female don't mate 100% (and vice versa). The main 'metallic' difference is that the 75 ohm pin is usually tapered more (ie more pointed), and the 50 ohm is more rounded. Electrically, the 50 ohm male also has more PTFE dielectric between the pin and the outer leaves. But essentially, you can slap them together with impunity. [But note: 50 and 75 ohm N-connectors DO NOT mix.] -- Ian |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes In article , J G Miller wrote: I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? I'd say the losses of the transformer likely to outweigh any gains. Exactly. In any case, it's highly unlikely that the receiver input IS a very good 50 ohms (an/or that the aerial feed is a very good 75 ohms). I'll second that. -- Martin |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roger Mills wrote:
In an earlier contribution to this discussion, J G Miller wrote: I have tried several Web searches but have not found anything appropriate, perhaps because I am not using the correct search terms, so can anybody provide help with the following problem. I have a radio receiver with a 50 ohm impedance BNC input. I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? What you need is an appropriate *balun*. The technical term for this answer is that it is complete and utter b******s! A balun is used to match a BALanced device to an UNbalanced one. The degree of mismatch on receive means it is not worth worrying about. Connect it and it should work OK. Peter Crosland |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Roger Mills
scribeth thus In an earlier contribution to this discussion, J G Miller wrote: I have tried several Web searches but have not found anything appropriate, perhaps because I am not using the correct search terms, so can anybody provide help with the following problem. I have a radio receiver with a 50 ohm impedance BNC input. I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? What you need is an appropriate *balun*. Nope theres on need for any balanced to unbalanced conversion to be done. Just use it as others have described the input Z prolly won't be exactly 50 ohms anyway... -- Tony Sayer |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"J G Miller" wrote in message ... I have tried several Web searches but have not found anything appropriate, perhaps because I am not using the correct search terms, so can anybody provide help with the following problem. I have a radio receiver with a 50 ohm impedance BNC input. I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? Just connect it without any matching device. It won't make any difference. What with the losses in the matcher and the liklihood that the receiver won't be exactly 50ohms I'd be very surpried if a matcher could improve things at all. Bill |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:05:33 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: In article , J G Miller wrote: I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? I'd say the losses of the transformer likely to outweigh any gains. I believe DAB is suppose to be 50 Ohms. When I got my first DAB tuner about 6 years ago I rigged up the aerial with 50 Ohm cable and it worked fine. When I eventually changed it for 75 Ohm cable, there was very little difference. Marky P. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Marky P wrote:
**J G Miller wrote: I wish to connect an antenna with 75 ohm impedance coaxial output to the receiver. Making the physical connection is not a problem with a suitable converter, but an anybody suggest a supplier of a suitable transformer? I'd say the losses of the transformer likely to outweigh any gains. I believe DAB is suppose to be 50 Ohms. *When I got my first DAB tuner about 6 years ago I rigged up the aerial with 50 Ohm cable and it worked fine. *When I eventually changed it for 75 Ohm cable, there was very little difference. It's a different frequency band as well, which makes a bit of a nonsense of my DAB/FM hi-fi tuner using the same connector for both services, but I just plugged in the Band II 3-element folded dipole I've been using on FM for years, and it works fine on both systems. At least, the DAB signal strength or quality indicator, or whatever it is, shows full scale on most programmes, so presumably it's working as well as it can. It still doesn't sound as good as FM though. Rod. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some antenna information for OTA HDTV | Sam | High definition TV | 6 | May 26th 07 02:16 AM |
| LCD Television set up information request. | dirksdonuts | UK digital tv | 7 | January 16th 06 02:36 PM |
| Basic information request | Robert Bainbridge | Satellite dbs | 4 | December 2nd 03 03:39 AM |
| Basic information request | Robert Bainbridge | Satellite dbs | 0 | November 30th 03 04:48 PM |
| DAB antenna impedance? | Peter Crosland | UK digital tv | 3 | July 15th 03 03:16 AM |