![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi All,
I thought I knew what I wanted. Now I am not so sure. Currently I have a 27" Magnovox as my main TV(It seems big enough for my wife's and my needs), but since we got a Wii and prices have started coming down I am becoming more interested in purchasing an HDTV. I have $1000 to spend(maybe a little more). Here are my questions Should I go with plasma(saw a panasonic 40" for $900), or LCD? I definitely know I don't know 1080p and finally 37" vs 40". Having a 27", 37" will probably seem like a huge upgrade and it's far less expensive. But, if 40" is that much more I wouldn't mind spending a $100 on that. Thanks |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... Hi All, I thought I knew what I wanted. Now I am not so sure. Currently I have a 27" Magnovox as my main TV(It seems big enough for my wife's and my needs), but since we got a Wii and prices have started coming down I am becoming more interested in purchasing an HDTV. I have $1000 to spend(maybe a little more). Here are my questions Should I go with plasma(saw a panasonic 40" for $900), or LCD? I definitely know I don't know 1080p and finally 37" vs 40". Having a 27", 37" will probably seem like a huge upgrade and it's far less expensive. But, if 40" is that much more I wouldn't mind spending a $100 on that. Thanks CRT is still the best for speed and color and image quality. Plasma and DLP-Projector is second best for speed and color and image quality. LCD is the worst for color and speed and image quality. Don't buy Sony TV's |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:01:10 GMT, "newshead" wrote:
LCD is the worst for color and speed and image quality. Don't buy Sony TV's You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. A_C |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... Hi All, I thought I knew what I wanted. Now I am not so sure. Currently I have a 27" Magnovox as my main TV(It seems big enough for my wife's and my needs), but since we got a Wii and prices have started coming down I am becoming more interested in purchasing an HDTV. I have $1000 to spend(maybe a little more). Here are my questions Should I go with plasma(saw a panasonic 40" for $900), or LCD? I definitely know I don't know 1080p and finally 37" vs 40". Having a 27", 37" will probably seem like a huge upgrade and it's far less expensive. But, if 40" is that much more I wouldn't mind spending a $100 on that. Thanks First off, keep in mind that to have an image on an HD set that is the same height as your 27 inch SD set, the HD set needs to have a screen size of slightly more than 32 inches. I would go with a 37 inch LCD. CRT is not an option, and the vast majority of plasma sets in your price range will not be real HD with their 1024 x 768 displays. I vote for a brand name 37 as opposed to a throwaway brand 40. Tam |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 8, 10:59�am, "Tam" wrote:
wrote in message ... Hi All, I thought I knew what I wanted. �Now I am not so sure. Currently I have a 27" Magnovox as my main TV(It seems big enough for my wife's and my needs), but since we got a Wii and prices have started coming down I am becoming more interested in purchasing an HDTV. I have $1000 to spend(maybe a little more). Here are my questions Should I go with plasma(saw a panasonic 40" for $900), or LCD? I definitely know I don't know 1080p and finally 37" vs 40". �Having a 27", 37" will probably seem like a huge upgrade and it's far less expensive. �But, if 40" is that much more I wouldn't mind spending a $100 on that. Thanks First off, keep in mind that to have an image on an HD set that is the same height as your 27 inch SD set, the HD set needs to have a screen size of slightly more than 32 inches. I would go with a 37 inch LCD. CRT is not an option, and the vast majority of plasma sets in your price range will not be real HD with their 1024 x 768 displays. I vote for a brand name 37 as opposed to a throwaway brand 40. Tam- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good news! You can afford a 42"! http://reviews.pricegrabber.com/plas...ceptre%252042/ Sharper than plasma and no burn-in! Lower current draw. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:12:22 -0800, Johndagolfer wrote:
Here are my questions Should I go with plasma(saw a panasonic 40" for $900), or LCD? I definitely know I don't know 1080p and finally 37" vs 40". Having a 27", 37" will probably seem like a huge upgrade and it's far less expensive. But, if 40" is that much more I wouldn't mind spending a $100 on that. To have the same SD size picture on an HDTV, multiply the SD set size by 1.22. That means you need a 33" HDTv to have the same size SD picture that you have now. a 37" HDTV is about the same as a 30.x" SDTV. I bought a 37" to replace my wifes 32" SDTV and she is more than happy with the size. Even though the SD picture is a little smaller, it appears bigger because of the shape of the TV and the clarity of the picture. Besides, most of the shows shw watches are in HD anyway. I found the Envision 37" on sale at Staples for $599.99 just before Christmas and got it. Excellent tuner that supports ATSC/NTSC/QAM and the picture is perfect. It also has a VGA input, which was a must for me since all my TV's are behind PC's running MythTV. I used both the VGA and HDMI inputs to test both and they both worked well. FWIW, Envision is the TV division of AOC and their parent company. They've been making video displays and TV's for more than 20 years. This is it,and it looks like it's now $599 retail. http://www.staples.com/webapp/wcs/st...3:CG4:CL142471 -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"newshead" wrote in message news:[email protected] wrote in message ... Hi All, I thought I knew what I wanted. Now I am not so sure. Currently I have a 27" Magnovox as my main TV(It seems big enough for my wife's and my needs), but since we got a Wii and prices have started coming down I am becoming more interested in purchasing an HDTV. I have $1000 to spend(maybe a little more). Here are my questions Should I go with plasma(saw a panasonic 40" for $900), or LCD? I definitely know I don't know 1080p and finally 37" vs 40". Having a 27", 37" will probably seem like a huge upgrade and it's far less expensive. But, if 40" is that much more I wouldn't mind spending a $100 on that. Thanks CRT is still the best for speed and color and image quality. Plasma and DLP-Projector is second best for speed and color and image quality. LCD is the worst for color and speed and image quality. Don't buy Sony TV's Obviously, you must not think much of Consumer Reports, since they rated Sony as number one in 52" and 46-47" LCDs, number one and two in 32" LCDS, and number two in 40-42" LCD TVs. Only one make of TV that has a lower repair rate than Sony (Panasonic has a repair rate of 2% vs Sony's 3%). In addition, Consumer Reports has ratings on eight of Sony's models. All eight Sonys received excellent ratings for both HD and SD picture quality, and seven of the eight models received an excellent rating for DVD picture quality (KDL-46s3000 only received a very good rating). Finally, in regard to your statement that "LCD is the worst for color and speed and image quality," even the lowest rated Sony (of the 8 Sony models listed) received a higher overall score than 16 of the 29 Plasma TVs that were tested in the March 08 issue of Consumer Reports. So, your disdain for Sony is not shared by Consumer Reports, an organization that has been objectively testing and reporting on consumer products since 1936. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"newshead" wrote in message
news:[email protected] wrote in message ... Hi All, I thought I knew what I wanted. Now I am not so sure. Currently I have a 27" Magnovox as my main TV(It seems big enough for my wife's and my needs), but since we got a Wii and prices have started coming down I am becoming more interested in purchasing an HDTV. I have $1000 to spend(maybe a little more). Here are my questions Should I go with plasma(saw a panasonic 40" for $900), or LCD? I definitely know I don't know 1080p and finally 37" vs 40". Having a 27", 37" will probably seem like a huge upgrade and it's far less expensive. But, if 40" is that much more I wouldn't mind spending a $100 on that. Thanks CRT is still the best for speed and color and image quality. Plasma and DLP-Projector is second best for speed and color and image quality. LCD is the worst for color and speed and image quality. Don't buy Sony TV's Ummm.. Let's see... My 1986 XBR25 still going strong My 2005 SFP XS955 HDTV still blows away either Plasma or LCD for PQ in terms of black value and motion quality -- All the Best, Richard Harison |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Confused buyer looking for LCD 27"-32" recommendation | [email protected] | High definition TV | 7 | August 2nd 06 03:43 AM |
| Need advice on TiVO for first time buyer (Advantages/Disavantages & recommendations? Please) | Steven B. | Tivo personal television | 30 | November 14th 03 04:36 AM |
| First Time Buyer Advice | Tyrone Floryanzia | Tivo personal television | 4 | November 8th 03 01:41 AM |
| First Time Buyer Advice | Tyrone Floryanzia | Tivo personal television | 0 | November 7th 03 11:12 PM |
| Need advice on TiVO for first time buyer (Advantages/Disavantages & recommendations? Please) | Steven B. | Tivo personal television | 0 | November 6th 03 01:17 PM |