The Economist Article: Sharper image - Who needs Blu-ray or HD DVD anyway? DOA

"boodybandit" wrote in message
. ..

"RKRM" wrote in message
. ..

"really real" wrote in message
news:[email protected]


What has become clear is that Blu-ray and HD DVD are both interim
solutions-if even that. They are marginally better than upscaled DVDs,
but neither will stand much of a chance against fibre's ability to
deliver high-definition video on demand. Meanwhile, neither comes close
to giving the kind of "immersive reality" that vision engineers drool
over.



I disagree with this. I just bought a PS3 so I could play Planet Earth
Blu Ray. The difference between a high def dvd and a regular dvd is so
startling that I no longer want to buy regular dvds.

I agree completely. Who are these people that can't see the difference?

Haters, fanboys and people that need the least little thing to bitch about
/ fear change.

Haters? lol. I know 13 year old kids that talk like that.
Yup people that fear change need the least little things to bitch about.
Wow how profound..please tech us some more stupid logic.
Generalize much?

"Hill" wrote in message
news:[email protected]
Generalize much?

To generalize is to rationalize on Usenet.

Irony a dip**** with [email protected] would refer to anyone as a 13 year
old. But then again 99% of the people you meet on Usenet usually are
hypocrites.

"boodybandit" wrote in message
. ..

"Hill" wrote in message
news:[email protected]
Generalize much?

To generalize is to rationalize on Usenet.

Irony a dip**** with [email protected] would refer to anyone as a 13 year
old. But then again 99% of the people you meet on Usenet usually are
hypocrites.

and you fit right in that generalization perfectly.