![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
and thus Camper inscribed ...
I meant that the SD had ghosting, which the HD doesn't have. Signal is there or not. But yeah, the SD feed on my HDTV does magnify flaws. I think you are confusing SD with analogue. Here in Australia SD is short for Standard Definition and is a digital broadcast, therefore no ghosting. Sure, I might. I had always thought of the SD feed as being the same as the analogue feed, in 4:3 format, while the HD feed as being digital feed in 16:9 format. -- "... respect, all good works are not done by only good folk. For here, at the end of all things, we shall do what needs to be done." --till next time, Jameson Stalanthas Yu -x- poetry.dolphins-cove.com |
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:48:06 +0000, Gordon Burditt wrote:
Wes is the guy who has done the most to turn me off of MythTV (pretty much singlehandedly). He kept claiming that his setup could do A, B, and C for under $X, (Here A might be "use a TV to watch shows", and B might be "2 simultaneous recordings" and $X might be the price of the latest Tivo offering) but when you try to pin him down, it turns out you can't have A, B, and C *simultaneously* for $X, and he answered lots of questions with "well, you've just got to know how to build systems" or "you've just got to know how to shop". I come away feeling the whole thing is a scam. And I'm not confident that I could make it work without a LOT more development effort than I have time for. Listen, I'm not your personal shopper. If you're too stupid to take generalizations and purchase hardware based on that I really couldn't care less. Yep. I remember you now from the Tivo group. And disregard my other offer for free phone support if I offered it in the other post. And by the way, all my claims were true, but you know that already. You and your cohorts only comeback was you didn't want to buy it on sale, and instead of my reply of just use pricewatch or yahoo shopping you wanted a link for every part in the system. Not in this or your next lifetime. And if you think it bothers me that you don't use mythtv, not in the least. It's you that's missing out, not me. BTW, those same claims have been in the links in my sigline for a couple of years. No one else has questioned there validity. That's an invitation to all that want to all that want to confirm this. -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php |
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
|
~consul wrote:
and thus Camper inscribed ... I meant that the SD had ghosting, which the HD doesn't have. Signal is there or not. But yeah, the SD feed on my HDTV does magnify flaws. I think you are confusing SD with analogue. Here in Australia SD is short for Standard Definition and is a digital broadcast, therefore no ghosting. Sure, I might. I had always thought of the SD feed as being the same as the analogue feed, in 4:3 format, while the HD feed as being digital feed in 16:9 format. In my area, the cable company rents all-digital boxes. They convert over-the-air NTSC analogue to 480i 4:3 digital. They use the same channel positions (with one exception) as they do for the analogue channels, which for the moment I can still tune in a television. I couldn't figure out why the digital tuner in the tv was picking up a digital simulcast in a random channel location of a broadcast channel. At first I thought it was just a broadcast subchannel, but then I realized it was a conversion made at the cable head end. My tv has both an analogue and digital tuner, but the cable box only a digital tuner. |
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wes Newell wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:25:38 -0500, Bill R wrote: Wes Newell wrote: On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:29:08 -0800, G-squared wrote: It appears that everybody is eligible but why would you want a converter box for a VCR? A cheap ATSC tuner for your computer is so much better than a VCR. If you have enough money for the computer to write this on, you shouldn't need a government handout for TV. Or are you entitled? No, not everyone is eligible. Wes, you got it wrong. EVERYONE is eligible on the first round of coupons. See http://dtv2009.gov/FAQ.aspx I know that, but it wouldn't let me apply on line if I checked the box that I had a pay service. That was at 3AM Jan 1. I've asked for someone to verify it will now, and no one has. Maybe they've fixed it by now. I don't know. So the faq can everyone is eleigible all it wants. If you can't apply for them it's meaningless. I was able to apply on the web site, check the box that I had pay service and get a coupon (I only applied for one) but it was a few days after you applied and maybe, if there was a problem they fixed it (or maybe the problem was just site overload, this IS the government we are talking about). With all the people applying so early I wonder if once we get our coupons that there could be a shortage of boxes? I guess we will find out in a few months. -- Bill R. Remove nospam_ and x in e-mail address to reply by e-mail |
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why doesn't Windows count?
Because (a) it's got DRM in it (Vista especially but not exclusively), and (b) I know of no firewall for an antenna. But you *NEED* a firewall for an antenna with Windows. (If nothing else, Sony will I don't with my hauppauge usb HDTV. It works the same on my laptop w/ and w/o an internet connection. I think you pretty much have to assume that if you put it into Windows, Windows might try to execute it. (Microsoft Security Bulletins make interesting reading.) That means anything that goes in via network, keyboard, mouse, power cord, USB port, modem, Sony battery, CD-ROM, DVD, floppy, etc. Your Hauppauge usb HDTV pretty much sends in the transmitted digital stream as-is, without trying to transform it, right? So something like intentionally malformed MPEG4 will pass right through it? People trying to do DRM will resort to such things. try to use malicious broadcasts for copy-protection.) Also the longstanding uptime bug that wouldn't let Windows stay up for more than (what was it?) 37 days or so is not encouraging. Also, I don't want to have to expose Windows to the Internet to get schedules. Too many possibilities for viruses, even if the guy providing the schedules has a clean system. So you think that the folks who are broadcasting schedules OTA are also going to be sending viruses out that way? Not intentionally, but that doesn't mean they will avoid Sony equipment in the transmitting station. And don't rule out pirate TV stations. And it only takes one corrupt TV station to cause trouble. I suppose they could ... but I don't think so. I think it's already been demonstrated that DRM will use such methods. Many times. |
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wes is the guy who has done the most to turn me off of MythTV (pretty
much singlehandedly). He kept claiming that his setup could do A, B, and C for under $X, (Here A might be "use a TV to watch shows", and B might be "2 simultaneous recordings" and $X might be the price of the latest Tivo offering) but when you try to pin him down, it turns out you can't have A, B, and C *simultaneously* for $X, and he answered lots of questions with "well, you've just got to know how to build systems" or "you've just got to know how to shop". I come away feeling the whole thing is a scam. And I'm not confident that I could make it work without a LOT more development effort than I have time for. Listen, I'm not your personal shopper. If you're too stupid to take generalizations and purchase hardware based on that I really couldn't care less. If the generalization doesn't match up with any hardware as it is sold (by brand name), it doesn't help much. I don't expect to be able to find a list of chips used in every TV card out there to match up to a list of chipsets supported. The manufacturers don't advertise that info, and some want nondisclosure agreements. At the time of that discussion, not even one brand name of a TV card was mentioned on the mythtv website. And since there was mention of quite a few cards that DON'T work, some rather similar to ones that do, it's not nearly as simple as "get a 2GHz CPU or better [Intel architecture, brand unspecified], and at least 500GB of disk space [brand unspecified] for X hours of HDTV recording". Yep. I remember you now from the Tivo group. And disregard my other offer for free phone support if I offered it in the other post. And by the way, all my claims were true, but you know that already. You and your No, I still believe that in the discussion you recall, you claimed a number of capabilities like watching on a TV but the price of the system did not include a video card capable of providing outputs like that. cohorts only comeback was you didn't want to buy it on sale, and instead Given the descriptions from that discussion and on the mythtv web site, I couldn't find ANY TV card at ANY price that was indicated as supported. Or even tested by one guy who said it worked. There were plenty of TV cards for sale with names completely unlike anything on the mythtv site. I had the impression I was looking at a site describing long-discontinued merchandise (as far as the TV cards went). Googling the TV card descriptions came up with mythtv references and similar but no references to anyone selling TV cards. The site has gotten better now in terms of referencing hardware. I have not re-checked recently to see if any of it is actually for sale. I didn't say anything about not wanting to buy on sale (although others in that discussion did). But when you buy on sale, they are often rather vague about just what model it is they are selling. of my reply of just use pricewatch or yahoo shopping you wanted a link for every part in the system. Not in this or your next lifetime. And if you think it bothers me that you don't use mythtv, not in the least. It's you that's missing out, not me. BTW, those same claims have been in the links in my sigline for a couple of years. No one else has questioned there validity. I do have some fundamental disagreements with calculating the cost of a system omitting parts of the cost based on "you would have paid for that anyway for your desktop system" or "you would have paid for cable anyway". But those are more issues of cost accounting. That's an invitation to all that want to all that want to confirm this. |
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 8, 5:35*pm, (Gordon Burditt) wrote:
Why doesn't Windows count? Because (a) it's got DRM in it (Vista especially but not exclusively), and (b) I know of no firewall for an antenna. *But you *NEED* a firewall for an antenna with Windows. *(If nothing else, Sony will I don't with my hauppauge usb HDTV. It works the same on my laptop w/ and w/o an internet connection. I think you pretty much have to assume that if you put it into Windows, Windows might try to execute it. *(Microsoft Security Bulletins make interesting reading.) That means anything that goes in via network, keyboard, mouse, power cord, USB port, modem, Sony battery, CD-ROM, DVD, floppy, etc. *Your Hauppauge usb HDTV pretty much sends in the transmitted digital stream as-is, without trying to transform it, right? *So something like intentionally malformed MPEG4 will pass right through it? *People trying to do DRM will resort to such things. try to use malicious broadcasts for copy-protection.) *Also the longstanding uptime bug that wouldn't let Windows stay up for more than (what was it?) 37 days or so is not encouraging. *Also, I don't want to have to expose Windows to the Internet to get schedules. Too many possibilities for viruses, even if the guy providing the schedules has a clean system. So you think that the folks who are broadcasting schedules OTA are also going to be sending viruses out that way? Not intentionally, but that doesn't mean they will avoid Sony equipment in the transmitting station. *And don't rule out pirate TV stations. *And it only takes one corrupt TV station to cause trouble. I've worked for Sony broadcast and use Sony equipment at work. You give them WAY too much credit for smarts. They can't even get the $100,000+ SRW 5500 tape machine to properly lock the reference to 720p. You have to send it NTSC black in the high def reference input to get it to work. You think those dummies could put stuff into the data? AGAIN its video data NOT executable code. I suppose they could ... but I don't think so. I think it's already been demonstrated that DRM will use such methods. Many times. You _are_ a conspiracy guy. Video data is like audio data in that it's DATA and not code. It isn't "object oriented programming" where the code to handle the data is part of the overall block. You actually have to execute malicious code to 'infect' the machine. As I said before, even if a virus was embedded in the data stream it's not treated as executable code. Didn't the FCC say no broadcast flag a couple years back? What would DRM do for that? GG |
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:21:55 -0500, Bill R wrote:
I was able to apply on the web site, check the box that I had pay service and get a coupon (I only applied for one) but it was a few days after you applied and maybe, if there was a problem they fixed it (or maybe the problem was just site overload, this IS the government we are talking about). Thanks for the confirmation. -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php |
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
|
"~consul" wrote in message ... and thus Camper inscribed ... I meant that the SD had ghosting, which the HD doesn't have. Signal is there or not. But yeah, the SD feed on my HDTV does magnify flaws. I think you are confusing SD with analogue. Here in Australia SD is short for Standard Definition and is a digital broadcast, therefore no ghosting. Sure, I might. I had always thought of the SD feed as being the same as the analogue feed, in 4:3 format, while the HD feed as being digital feed in 16:9 format. Here SD feed is 16:9 but of course not the quality of HD feed. |
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
|
Camper wrote:
"~consul" wrote in message ... and thus Camper inscribed ... I meant that the SD had ghosting, which the HD doesn't have. Signal is there or not. But yeah, the SD feed on my HDTV does magnify flaws. I think you are confusing SD with analogue. Here in Australia SD is short for Standard Definition and is a digital broadcast, therefore no ghosting. Sure, I might. I had always thought of the SD feed as being the same as the analogue feed, in 4:3 format, while the HD feed as being digital feed in 16:9 format. Here SD feed is 16:9 but of course not the quality of HD feed. That shouldn't be true of all programs. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Autoscan doesn't find digital broadcast channels | Ray K | High definition TV | 23 | March 8th 08 01:32 AM |
| over the air digital broadcast - don't waste your money yet | [email protected] | High definition TV | 49 | August 28th 06 08:55 PM |
| Chip Makes Mobile and Indoor Reception of Broadcast Digital TelevisionPossible | Bob Miller | High definition TV | 0 | January 31st 05 07:51 PM |
| Charleston WV Digital Broadcast | mu1640 | High definition TV | 0 | July 16th 03 01:20 AM |
| Comcast Digital cable 4:3 dtv content in 16:9 window. Why not fix this with firmawre or at broadcast. | High definition TV | 1 | July 9th 03 11:12 PM | |