A Home cinema forum. HomeCinemaBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HomeCinemaBanter forum » Home cinema newsgroups » High definition TV
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OTA versus Comcast HD?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 11th 07, 12:05 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
riggor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus Comcast HD? Is
it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD / SD
channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.

Thanks


--

to reply via email - remove the "nospam_" from the reply to address ...


  #2  
Old December 11th 07, 12:38 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Tom Stiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?

In article ,
"riggor" wrote:

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus Comcast HD? Is
it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD / SD
channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.


For what it's worth, there's no such thing as an HD antenna. I live in
New Jersey and receive all the Philadelphia OTA HD channels with no
problem. In general, the OTA picture is a little sharper than the one
produced by Comcast, plus the OTA signal retains all the PSIP data which
Comcast strips out.

--
Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
  #3  
Old December 11th 07, 03:30 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
pj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?

Tom Stiller wrote:
In article ,
"riggor" wrote:

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus Comcast HD? Is
it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD / SD
channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.


For what it's worth, there's no such thing as an HD antenna. I live in
New Jersey and receive all the Philadelphia OTA HD channels with no
problem. In general, the OTA picture is a little sharper than the one
produced by Comcast, plus the OTA signal retains all the PSIP data which
Comcast strips out.


With OTA, you'll also have sub-channels that
Comcast may not carry or may sometimes preempt
with paid programming. Locally, aside from
Discovery-HD and NFL-HD, there's not much HD
content on cable that's not also available OTA.

Same experience as Tom with sharpness. If you
are into fine detail during football games or
during 'Nature,' you'll prefer OTA over cable or
satellite. We have fewer lip-sync issues on OTA
than we see over cable.

Cost: may be negligible. We get ten local
stations with a 50-cent investment. Two stations
are 22 miles distant.

DTV does a far better job correcting ghosts than
did analog TV.

If you want to try this, take a two-foot chunk
of old RG-59 coax with a connector on one end
(or, chop one connector off a cheap VTR
patch cable). Strip 8-10" of insulation and
shielding from the end with no connector. Hang
that from a picture hook and screw or slip the
connector onto the ATSC/DTV input of your HDTV.

Effort: negligible -- YMMV g.
--
pj
  #4  
Old December 11th 07, 09:22 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Thumper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 569
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:05:35 -0500, "riggor"
wrote:

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus Comcast HD? Is
it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD / SD
channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.

Thanks



Do you want any premium channels?
Thumper
  #5  
Old December 13th 07, 09:52 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
riggor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?


"pj" wrote in message
...
Tom Stiller wrote:
In article ,
"riggor" wrote:

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus Comcast HD?
Is it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD / SD
channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.


For what it's worth, there's no such thing as an HD antenna. I live in
New Jersey and receive all the Philadelphia OTA HD channels with no
problem. In general, the OTA picture is a little sharper than the one
produced by Comcast, plus the OTA signal retains all the PSIP data which
Comcast strips out.


With OTA, you'll also have sub-channels that Comcast may not carry or may
sometimes preempt with paid programming. Locally, aside from Discovery-HD
and NFL-HD, there's not much HD content on cable that's not also available
OTA.

Same experience as Tom with sharpness. If you are into fine detail during
football games or during 'Nature,' you'll prefer OTA over cable or
satellite. We have fewer lip-sync issues on OTA than we see over cable.

Cost: may be negligible. We get ten local stations with a 50-cent
investment. Two stations are 22 miles distant.

DTV does a far better job correcting ghosts than did analog TV.

If you want to try this, take a two-foot chunk of old RG-59 coax with a
connector on one end (or, chop one connector off a cheap VTR patch cable).
Strip 8-10" of insulation and shielding from the end with no connector.
Hang that from a picture hook and screw or slip the connector onto the
ATSC/DTV input of your HDTV.

Effort: negligible -- YMMV g.
--
pj


Thanks all - I was out of town.

I will test and see what happens ...


  #6  
Old December 13th 07, 09:53 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
riggor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?


"Thumper" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:05:35 -0500, "riggor"
wrote:

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus Comcast HD?
Is
it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD / SD
channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.

Thanks



Do you want any premium channels?
Thumper


Sure if possible - but I am getting some of those thru Comcast


  #7  
Old December 14th 07, 02:05 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Thumper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 569
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:53:10 -0500, "riggor"
wrote:


"Thumper" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:05:35 -0500, "riggor"
wrote:

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus Comcast HD?
Is
it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD / SD
channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.

Thanks



Do you want any premium channels?
Thumper


Sure if possible - but I am getting some of those thru Comcast

The point is that if you are getting them through Comcast you are also
getting probably everything you could get OTA. If you go OTA you lose
the premium HD.
Thumper
  #8  
Old December 14th 07, 11:10 AM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Joel Graffman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?

If you have a big enough screen you can notice a difference. With a 61 DLP,
when viewing the same program, I can see a difference between OTA, QAM
internal tuner, and my Comcast 8300HD tuner. Best is OTA, worst is 8300HD.

"Thumper" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:53:10 -0500, "riggor"
wrote:


"Thumper" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:05:35 -0500, "riggor"
wrote:

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus Comcast HD?
Is
it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD / SD
channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.

Thanks


Do you want any premium channels?
Thumper


Sure if possible - but I am getting some of those thru Comcast

The point is that if you are getting them through Comcast you are also
getting probably everything you could get OTA. If you go OTA you lose
the premium HD.
Thumper



  #9  
Old December 16th 07, 02:58 PM posted to alt.tv.tech.hdtv
L Alpert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 374
Default OTA versus Comcast HD?

Joel Graffman wrote:
If you have a big enough screen you can notice a difference. With a
61 DLP, when viewing the same program, I can see a difference between
OTA, QAM internal tuner, and my Comcast 8300HD tuner. Best is OTA,
worst is 8300HD.


I originally opted to put up a new rooftop wineguard since back in '01 cable
didn't offer HD when I first purchased a 55" RPTV. Once they did offer it,
I got it for the premium channels, and I was able to compare via switching
inputs, and there was no difference from what I could tell.

When I upgraded to a 73" DLP, the difference was still indistinguishable. I
would have to say it all depends on the incoming signal and wiring, as I did
have to rewire the house when I went to HD over cable, as the old wiring
(circa mid 70's) would not support the bandwidth needed and had too many old
splitters and drops (also added a 10db amp at incoming).

I have since moved, and the area I am in now has only 2 OTA HD stations
within 60 miles, so I have not invested in an OTA antenna setup, though I
would have to say the cable HD service I have here is subjectively
equitable....


"Thumper" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:53:10 -0500, "riggor"
wrote:


"Thumper" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:05:35 -0500, "riggor"
wrote:

Hello all -

I live in Bryn Mawr, Delaware County, Radnor Township - outside of
Philadelphia. I have Comcast HD programming.

I am curious if anyone knows how different is OTA HD versus
Comcast HD? Is
it worth getting a HD antenna to get (if any) additional OTA HD /
SD channels?

By worth I mean time, cost and effort.

Thanks


Do you want any premium channels?
Thumper

Sure if possible - but I am getting some of those thru Comcast

The point is that if you are getting them through Comcast you are
also getting probably everything you could get OTA. If you go OTA
you lose the premium HD.
Thumper



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SONY XBR versus XS [email protected] High definition TV 3 December 29th 05 01:55 PM
ADA versus Crestron versus Elan JPERK1819 Home theater (general) 2 April 30th 05 06:57 AM
HDMI versus DVI Marty C High definition TV 16 March 12th 05 02:16 AM
Component versus VGA, and the winner is ? Rick Lockshin High definition TV 5 October 19th 04 05:59 PM
QXL versus eBay Simon Heather UK home cinema 5 January 6th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 HomeCinemaBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.