![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am looking for a smaller HDTV for a bedroom. It seems as though you
have to go at least to a 32 inch set to get 1080p. On a smaller HDTV (26in. - 32 in.) can you really tell the difference between 1080p and 720p? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"sharon" wrote in message ... I am looking for a smaller HDTV for a bedroom. It seems as though you have to go at least to a 32 inch set to get 1080p. On a smaller HDTV (26in. - 32 in.) can you really tell the difference between 1080p and 720p? To be brief, "no." steveo |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:53:42 -0700, sharon wrote:
I am looking for a smaller HDTV for a bedroom. It seems as though you have to go at least to a 32 inch set to get 1080p. On a smaller HDTV (26in. - 32 in.) can you really tell the difference between 1080p and 720p? No, I promise. A_C |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Keep in mind that, when it comes to screen sizes a widescreen inch gives you
considerably fewer square inches of screen space than a non-widescreen inch. If you're thinking your old 27" set was perfectly adequate, you'll find that a 27" widescreen looks tiny by comparison. You might then decide that 32" is the minimum acceptable size after all. "sharon" wrote in message ... I am looking for a smaller HDTV for a bedroom. It seems as though you have to go at least to a 32 inch set to get 1080p. On a smaller HDTV (26in. - 32 in.) can you really tell the difference between 1080p and 720p? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:44:20 GMT, JimK wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:20:02 GMT, (Dave) wrote: .... The following is often cited: http://hdguru.com/wp-content/uploads...ance_chart.pdf Whats the difference from a 60 inch 1080x1920 display with a dot pitch of 0.6918mm and a 32 inch 1080x1920 display with a pitch dot of 0.369mm. The 60 inch 1080x1920 display will look the same at 8.57 feet as the 32 inch 1080x1920 display at 4.57 feet. Your chart even states optimual viewing distance for 1080i/p is 50.21 inhes (4.1 feet) and for 720p display is 75.31 inches (6.27 feet) With a direct view panel, my opinion is that the viewing distance/pixel pitch ratio shall be increased somewhat more so that the sharp pixel structure in the panel blend together and you can _not_ resolve the pixels. If you select the viwing distance so that you can see "all the 1080 details" the picture will not look smooth and natural. I have my own rule of thumb that goes: optimum viewing distance = pixel pitch * 4000. For a 32" 768 panel that means 2m (=6.9'). A 32" 1080 panel (if they exist) woudl give 1.5m (=4.9') This shall be compared to the chart that uses the commonly used resolution limit of one arc minute as the optimum meaning that the pixels in the panel would begin to show up. It might vary between individuals (and panels) but should provide a starting point. /Jan |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
sharon wrote:
I am looking for a smaller HDTV for a bedroom. It seems as though you have to go at least to a 32 inch set to get 1080p. On a smaller HDTV (26in. - 32 in.) can you really tell the difference between 1080p and 720p? Thanks for the replies. The room that the new set will be used in is a bedroom that we have converted into a computer room. The viewing distance will be approximately 4 1/2 to 5 feet. At that distance would a 32 in .set with 720 p work well? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:53:50 -0700, sharon wrote:
Thanks for the replies. The room that the new set will be used in is a bedroom that we have converted into a computer room. The viewing distance will be approximately 4 1/2 to 5 feet. At that distance would a 32 in .set with 720 p work well? It would be too large for me. I watch a 27" at about that same distance. Before going to widescreen I had a 21" 4:3 analog set. Tried a 25" and that was too big. Used a 19" 4:3" monitor at 1600x1200 for a while and that was ok. if going from a 4:3 set that is about the right size now, just multiple its size by 1.29 to get the perfect wide screen size for you. -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wes Newell wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:53:50 -0700, sharon wrote: Thanks for the replies. The room that the new set will be used in is a bedroom that we have converted into a computer room. The viewing distance will be approximately 4 1/2 to 5 feet. At that distance would a 32 in .set with 720 p work well? It would be too large for me. I watch a 27" at about that same distance. Before going to widescreen I had a 21" 4:3 analog set. Tried a 25" and that was too big. Used a 19" 4:3" monitor at 1600x1200 for a while and that was ok. if going from a 4:3 set that is about the right size now, just multiple its size by 1.29 to get the perfect wide screen size for you. I think Wes is very close to 'just-right' and, even 'Goldilocks' would be happy with his suggestion. We've had some extremes in our guest room. Guests 'lived' with a 13 inch CRT-SD set for years. 5 feet from the treadmill and about 9 feet from the pillows on the bed -- too small for either -- but we prefer that our guests not get overly 'comfortable.' LOL We moved a 42 inch, ED 16:9 panel in there and fed it with an signal from an HD tuner. Too large (and slightly coarse.) We then tried a 25" CRT set 4:3, that had been 'hiding' in the garage. That seems closer to what's needed for both short-term viewing during exercise (5 ft.) and steady viewing from the bed at 9 feet. -- pj |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:53:42 -0700, sharon wrote:
I am looking for a smaller HDTV for a bedroom. It seems as though you have to go at least to a 32 inch set to get 1080p. On a smaller HDTV (26in. - 32 in.) can you really tell the difference between 1080p and 720p? In some cases, yes, and the 720 looks *better*, the pixel size gets too small for the current technologies to work well, squeezing too many on a little screen. J. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:40:58 -0800, pj wrote:
I think Wes is very close to 'just-right' and, even 'Goldilocks' would be happy with his suggestion. We've had some extremes in our guest room. Guests 'lived' with a 13 inch CRT-SD set for years. 5 feet from the treadmill and about 9 feet from the pillows on the bed -- too small for either -- but we prefer that our guests not get overly 'comfortable.' LOL I saw the 108" Panasonic plasma today. Did not really like the picture quality from anything less than ten feet. There is such a thing as too big! J. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 720P VS. 1080P | Eddie G | High definition TV | 24 | October 9th 07 05:57 PM |
| 720P, 1080p | Richard[_2_] | High definition TV | 17 | July 9th 07 07:16 PM |
| 1080P vs. 720P | [email protected] | High definition TV | 126 | July 4th 07 09:49 PM |
| 1080i / 720p / 1080p | drs_retired | High definition TV | 20 | June 1st 04 07:49 AM |