![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 20, 9:57 pm, Dave Farrance
wrote: wrote: Hello Dave. First and foremost many thanks on your advice and help. I do appreciate the fact you have refrained from pointing out any grammatical errors I have made. If I do ever use the computer to type,obviously I take time to plan and set out the content. Otherwise i use it for research. I have a few close pals with instant message accounts and I can only explain my poor literacy skills as sheer laziness. When you spend all day having to be 150% correct, it's nice to be able to just Waffle" as it were, and not worry. Anyhow, thankyou once again, I am just off up into the loft to try this new aerial out. To all others reading this ....Do not worry, If it works, I need not come here to tell you. Deal??? Regards Zoe, 32 year old female (obviously) English teacher. Cambridgeshire. hi zoe yeah i knew instant messaging style when i saw it i use internet relay chat which is the same sorta thing and there i use all lower case for speed and newlines instead of punctuation But, as you've found out, Internet forums are a bit different. This particular newsgroup system is called Usenet, and has been running since 1979. (Google-groups is just one of many gateways to it, by the way.) You've run into this thing called "netiquette", which has grown up mostly here in Usenet, which is a bunch of informal rules to let us get on with each other reasonably OK. You can search on that term, if you want. Part of that happens to be an expectation that people take a little time to compose a coherent and punctuated message, although a colloquial style is OK. Anyway, despite the fuss, you're getting to the answers that you want, so you should get the telly sorted out eventually. And as others here have said, please do tell us if you do get it working, so that we know that we've not been wasting our time. -- Dave Farrance Dear all,Firstly may you all accept my sincere apologies relating to the grammatical content of my first post.I ignorantly spoke to you all like i would on an instant messenger service. However since learning a few important facts about this site I will in future (if I dare return)use the correct grammar and content to the best of my ability regarding any technical queries. News is as follows:- I have installed my new aerial and coax etc etc,and re-scanned my television. The result being as follows:-Clearer picture,and 86 channels to date. Thanks all for your advice,much appreciated. |
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... News is as follows:- I have installed my new aerial and coax etc etc,and re-scanned my television. The result being as follows:-Clearer picture,and 86 channels to date. Thanks all for your advice,much appreciated. Well don't just disappear! We've enjoyed having you here! Pop in and see us sometime. Bill |
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 20, 10:41 pm, "Bill Wright"
wrote: wrote in message ups.com... News is as follows:- I have installed my new aerial and coax etc etc,and re-scanned my television. The result being as follows:-Clearer picture,and 86 channels to date. Thanks all for your advice,much appreciated. Well don't just disappear! We've enjoyed having you here! Pop in and see us sometime. Bill Are you serious? Surely I have upset enough of you?? To be perfectly honest with you,I presumed you were all aged around your thirties? I feel quite ashamed of the way I retaliated to some of you. I was always taught to respect my elders,and have done so,until now. I hang my head in shame. |
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Bill Wright wrote: "charles" wrote in message ... In article , If you are prepared to tolerate the signal deteriorating due to corrosion building up on the copper conductor, then don't solder. To make a proper joint, use solder. Alas Charles, this is a council of perfection. We live in the world of quick, cheap, easy, and short-lived. Its your last word that sums it up. If you are doing the work for yourself, it's worth spending the extra time to get something a bit longer lasting ;-) -- From KT24 - in "Leafy Surrey" Using a RISC OS computer running v5.11 |
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article om,
wrote: My apologies for not conforming to your expectations. I do find you quite rude. You don't even know me and are ready to judge. I did not take typing as a subject in school or university. I don't use computers in my English lessons either. In fact, when it comes to typing, I am totally "crap" is this the correct technical term??? Normally I wouldn't bother, but only because you yourself appear reluctant to let the matter drop, I find myself unable to resist the temptation to ask how the phrases "like i explained" and "i was lead to believe" can be put down to typing errors? Rod. |
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Bill Wright wrote:
Can I ask, What is the significance in the wire mesh around the coax being kept away from the inner wire? Strange as it might seem, the full explanation is long and arcane to the* point of stultification, but if you think about it, the cable is carrying* electricity like any other cable. (The only difference is that the* electricity is varying very rapidly in strength and the TV signal is* described by these variations). Now as you probably know, electricity likes* to find the easiest path, so if the inner core and the outer braid touch it* will take the path thus provided, as a sort of short cut. This means, of* course, that it won't need to go any further down the cable, so it won't get* to the TV set at the end of it. The explanation I've given you will annoy some members of this group, who* will feel that I have simplied to the point of inaccuracy, but I too was* once a teacher and I know that knowledge has to come in bite-sized chunks! Not at all. Even with 38 years experience in broadcast engineering, I always prefer explanations in Plain English whenever possible, and yours makes better sense to me than some I have seen in books. Rod. |
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... Well don't just disappear! We've enjoyed having you here! Pop in and see us sometime. Bill Are you serious? Surely I have upset enough of you?? Good heavens no. You haven't upset us, you have delighted us! We just love it when someone arrives and we can complain about their English. We are so bored, you know. I've been trapped in this part of cyberspace for years and years. If ever you want me I'll be here, unless I've nipped next door to uk.miserable-curmudgeons. To be perfectly honest with you,I presumed you were all aged around your thirties? I was when I first came in here, but I'm 58 now. I'm one of the youngest. I feel quite ashamed of the way I retaliated to some of you. It's what we deserve. I was always taught to respect my elders,and have done so,until now. I hang my head in shame. Well you see, newsgroups are a bit like driving on the road. Perfectly nice people who wouldn't say 'Boo!" to a goose if they met one face to face will, if they confront a stray goose in a newsgroup, yell abuse at it and threaten to eat it for their Christmas dinner. It's human nature I'm afraid. At least, that's what I say when I try to console the geese. Bill |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|