![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
valvejob wrote:
PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. Compare the actual power consumption of a 768p plasma screen to a similar sized LCD TV. Not from the spec sheet, but the actual power use. The better plasmas from Pioneer and Panasonic are only a little higher than the LCDs. The reason is that the power spec for a plasma in the manual or spec sheet is the MAXIMUM power draw. The power consumption of a plasma varies with the brightness of the displayed scene. It peaks for all white scenes, goes way down for dark scenes. The typical measured averaged power consumption of most plasmas in real world conditions runs around 40 to 50% of the rated max. My Panasonic TH-42PHD7UY draws 140 Watts on average, measured over a four hour period. In comparison, my retired 12+ year old 27" Sony Triniton CRT TV drew 90 Watts. LCDs, well CCFL back light models, don't vary dynamically much because they block the light from a constant back light. So their power consumption depends in part on what brightness the back light is set to. In general, they run at much closer to the rated power spec. So the difference between a plasma and same sized LCD is not as much as you might think. The 1080p plasmas, OTOH, do use more power because of the extra pixels they drive. The power consumption for these is supposed to be improved in future model years. If you want to save the power taken up by a big screen TV, replace 3 or 4 75 to 100 Watt incandescent bulbs with 15 to 23 Watt CFLs. My house is almost all CFLs, except for some ceiling lamps which are infrequently used. Ok, done with the long winded answer to what was probably a crank posting... Alan F |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alan F wrote:
Ok, done with the long winded answer to what was probably a crank posting... And you didn't even get to a comparison of plasma versus the various projection systems with their power-consuming lamps. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
valvejob wrote:
PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. Do you own a car? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:13:34 -0500, valvejob wrote:
PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. Wear green glasses. Get a smaller screen. Turn it off. Plant a tree. Install some solar cells. Cut your driving about two miles a day. Take cold showers. J. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Al Gore is destroying the environment......Oh, never mind...he invented the
environment "valvejob" wrote in message ... PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
curmudgeon wrote:
Al Gore is destroying the environment......Oh, never mind...he invented the environment "valvejob" wrote in message ... PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. Concerned about GREEN? When are we going to pull oil from all the shale in Colorado? There is an equivalent, in excess of a trillion barrels, nbrs that far exceed IRAQ, Saudia Ar, Kuwa, etc..... Right now 80% is fed-owned property. Think green? When is Al Gore going to give up his jet? So.... worry about pwr consumption of a plasma??? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan" wrote in message ... On 9/12/07 9:13 PM, valvejob wrote: PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. B.S. Yes they use more power than LCD for the size but not that more. Much better display tech for movement and viewing angles. But I still haven't seen one smaller than 50 inches that meets even 720P specs. Tam |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tam/WB2TT wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... On 9/12/07 9:13 PM, valvejob wrote: PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. B.S. Yes they use more power than LCD for the size but not that more. Much better display tech for movement and viewing angles. But I still haven't seen one smaller than 50 inches that meets even 720P specs. Tam The Panasonic TH-42PZ700U is a 42" 1080p model. I saw it going for less than $2K recently at a sale price at Best Buy. But at 42", 1080p does not really do much at 8 to 10' from the screen. Go to a BB or CC, stand 6, 8, 10 feet from the 1024x768 42" plasmas and the Panasonic 42PZ700 and see if you can see that much of a difference in detail for true HD source material. We won't get them now but a 1366x768p 42" plasma would do just fine. Alan F |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan wrote:
On 9/13/07 5:09 PM, WGD wrote: curmudgeon wrote: Al Gore is destroying the environment......Oh, never mind...he invented the environment "valvejob" wrote in message ... PLASMA is NOT green. They are power hogs and are destroying the environment. Concerned about GREEN? When are we going to pull oil from all the shale in Colorado? There is an equivalent, in excess of a trillion barrels, nbrs that far exceed IRAQ, Saudia Ar, Kuwa, etc..... Right now 80% is fed-owned property. Think green? When is Al Gore going to give up his jet? So.... worry about pwr consumption of a plasma??? I am still predicting cooling to start in 5 years! In whatever time, WE have no control over it. Maybe accept the fact the sun spots have considerable power of our environment. BTW, notice how quiet the Libs are, in spite of noise from here and there, given their poor showing - work ethic - in Congress? Where is Pelosi (spelling?) these days? In Syria again? MoveOn.org has a powerful clamp over Ms. Hillary - BTW, do we really want a third term?? Off the subject! Sorry!! |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another channel to avoid | Simon Finnigan | UK sky | 16 | February 7th 07 10:35 AM |
| Another channel to avoid | Nats | UK sky | 0 | February 3rd 07 10:16 PM |
| Another channel to avoid | The Wizard | UK sky | 3 | February 3rd 07 07:28 PM |
| Avoid Sky Plus £10 Charge | Scott Chambers | UK sky | 1 | January 25th 06 08:03 PM |
| Avoid QED!!!!!!!!!!!! | Shahid | UK home cinema | 5 | January 1st 04 10:53 PM |