![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Huge wrote:
How do you archive material when the disk is full? What happens when the disk fails and you lose everything as you were unable to archive all your favourite material? Archive? What's the point of that then? It's just telly - seen it once, no* need to see it again. Good Lhord. What a barbarian. I watch some movies over and over again. And there's music of course. Lots of people listen to it over and over again. Rod. |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Huge" wrote in message
... On 2007-09-07, Clive George wrote: wrote in message ps.com... How do you archive material when the disk is full? What happens when the disk fails and you lose everything as you were unable to archive all your favourite material? Archive? What's the point of that then? It's just telly - seen it once, no need to see it again. Good Lhord. What a barbarian. I watch some movies over and over again. Hmm. I'm more amenable to seeing things more than once than my wife, but I've still never gone for the collection of films-which-you've-seen which seem to be so popular. There's a sufficient turnover of stuff to watch compared to the amount I actually do watch that I never run out. Then again, I watch the films - unlike some (not by implication you) who treat them as background. Music is different though. cheers, clive |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clive George" wrote in message
... "Huge" wrote in message ... Good Lhord. What a barbarian. I watch some movies over and over again. Hmm. I'm more amenable to seeing things more than once than my wife, but I've still never gone for the collection of films-which-you've-seen which seem to be so popular. There's a sufficient turnover of stuff to watch compared to the amount I actually do watch that I never run out. That's not how it works. The presence of a film on the shelf (and the equipment to play it) means you never actually have to watch it. Douglas Adams correctly pointed out that a VCR is a time-saving device. -- Max Demian |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roderick Stewart" wrote in message .. . In article , Ivan wrote: Flash memory devices are steadily increasing in capacity whilst the price has dropped dramatically (SD cards now up to 8 GB) However I do have to admit not being up to speed on these kind of developments, so I'd like to ask the more knowledgeable on this group 'is there any major technical reason why some kind of memory card can't became a De Facto interchangeable standard on millions of PVR's around the world, maybe coupled with MPEG4?. especially as it's almost certain that not only will memory capacity continue to improve but prices will also plummet. SD already is a sort of de facto standard for storing material on all sorts of gadgets, mostly pocket ones, though I suspect it is used a lot less frequently for exchange of data between gadgets, because mostly people just want to swap the occasional snapshot, and they can use bluetooth or MMS for that. For swapping stuff between computers, the USB dongle drive seems pretty popular. Whatever is cheapest and easiest to use will always be the one most people use, and in five years time there will be something completely different, and Sony will invent their own incompatible version of the same thing, then a smaller one that needs an adaptor, and so on. So Rod it would appear that apart from cost technically there is absolutely no reason why the SD card couldn't be king in the PVR world. This evening I did a bit of experimentation, I converted an hour long TV programme from my Humax (.TS files) to MPEG 2 and transferred them to a 2 GB SD card, the total file size was 1.45 GB, and the results on my my 28" w/s appeared to be equally as good as when played back from the original HD (allowing for the fact that my Toshiba player only outputs composite video). I know very little about MPEG 4 but I'm assuming that it's more efficient than MPEG 2, so it follows that the file sizes would be smaller, can you give me a rough idea by how much and would be resultant picture quality be as good as with MPEG 2? Cheers Ivan Rod. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ivan wrote:
"Roderick Stewart" wrote in message .. . In article , Ivan wrote: Flash memory devices are steadily increasing in capacity whilst the price has dropped dramatically (SD cards now up to 8 GB) However I do have to admit not being up to speed on these kind of developments, so I'd like to ask the more knowledgeable on this group 'is there any major technical reason why some kind of memory card can't became a De Facto interchangeable standard on millions of PVR's around the world, maybe coupled with MPEG4?. especially as it's almost certain that not only will memory capacity continue to improve but prices will also plummet. SD already is a sort of de facto standard for storing material on all sorts of gadgets, mostly pocket ones, though I suspect it is used a lot less frequently for exchange of data between gadgets, because mostly people just want to swap the occasional snapshot, and they can use bluetooth or MMS for that. For swapping stuff between computers, the USB dongle drive seems pretty popular. Whatever is cheapest and easiest to use will always be the one most people use, and in five years time there will be something completely different, and Sony will invent their own incompatible version of the same thing, then a smaller one that needs an adaptor, and so on. So Rod it would appear that apart from cost technically there is absolutely no reason why the SD card couldn't be king in the PVR world. This evening I did a bit of experimentation, I converted an hour long TV programme from my Humax (.TS files) to MPEG 2 and transferred them to a 2 GB SD card, the total file size was 1.45 GB, and the results on my my 28" w/s appeared to be equally as good as when played back from the original HD (allowing for the fact that my Toshiba player only outputs composite video). I know very little about MPEG 4 but I'm assuming that it's more efficient than MPEG 2, so it follows that the file sizes would be smaller, can you give me a rough idea by how much and would be resultant picture quality be as good as with MPEG 2? Cheers Ivan Rod. An awful lot of info on here http://www.videohelp.com/ if you're *really* interested in the technology. Not for the fainthearted though. |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Max Demian wrote:
"Clive George" wrote in message ... "Huge" wrote in message ... Good Lhord. What a barbarian. I watch some movies over and over again. Hmm. I'm more amenable to seeing things more than once than my wife, but I've still never gone for the collection of films-which-you've-seen which seem to be so popular. There's a sufficient turnover of stuff to watch compared to the amount I actually do watch that I never run out. That's not how it works. The presence of a film on the shelf (and the equipment to play it) means you never actually have to watch it. Douglas Adams correctly pointed out that a VCR is a time-saving device. :-) |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Ivan wrote:
Sony will invent their own incompatible version of the same thing, then a smaller one that needs an adaptor, and so on. So Rod it would appear that apart from cost technically there is absolutely* no reason why the SD card couldn't be king in the PVR world. No practical reason at all as far as I can see. SD cards with capacities of 4GB (and rising) are readily available now, and the more we buy, the cheaper they will become. The more people use them, the more gadgets and adaptors will be produced to handle them. It all depends on what people want. Rod. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roderick Stewart" wrote in message .. . In article , Ivan wrote: Sony will invent their own incompatible version of the same thing, then a smaller one that needs an adaptor, and so on. So Rod it would appear that apart from cost technically there is absolutely no reason why the SD card couldn't be king in the PVR world. No practical reason at all as far as I can see. SD cards with capacities of Your new home sales in our home see why are you or are you so you CEDIA by the by line or year's work or home And is that to the you know who or where are you know how the mass on the are you why 4GB (and rising) are readily available now, and the more we buy, the cheaper they will become. The more people use them, the more gadgets and adaptors will be produced to handle them. It all depends on what people want. Yes I was thinking that something along the lines of a 4 GB SD card becoming the equivalent of a much higher quality VHS 4 hour tape, but with some kind of LP option for maybe 8 hours of standard VHS quality. Are you why are you It would be a simple matter of an onscreen menu asking if the user would like to transfer program/s to card.. So all it needs now then is for Topfield and Humax to get their heads together and incorporate an optional standardised card slot on their new models, I couldn't see it adding much more than a tenner in the way of additional hardware. Rod. |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Roderick
Stewart scribeth thus In article , Ivan wrote: Sony will invent their own incompatible version of the same thing, then a smaller one that needs an adaptor, and so on. So Rod it would appear that apart from cost technically there is absolutely* no reason why the SD card couldn't be king in the PVR world. No practical reason at all as far as I can see. SD cards with capacities of 4GB (and rising) are readily available now, and the more we buy, the cheaper they will become. The more people use them, the more gadgets and adaptors will be produced to handle them. It all depends on what people want. Rod. NE1 any experience of getting a windows PC to boot from a flash card or flash type memory at all?... -- Tony Sayer |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 2007-09-08 12:12:14 +0100, tony sayer said:
NE1 any experience of getting a windows PC to boot from a flash card or flash type memory at all?... Yes you can do it most easily with a compact flash card or equivalent plus an adaptor that emulates an IDE interface. However, this may not be very long lived. The problem is that the Windows monitor writes temporary and other files all over the place and generally makes a mess. Flash memory devices often have a limited number of allowable read/write cycles before going tits up. The technique is much easier to do with operating systems. For example, with Linux, one can mount all of the filesystems bar one as read-only. During boot, a Ramdisk is created and files that need to be RW or temporary files can be put on that. I have this working in a little dedicated, embedded machine used as a terminal server. It even has a watchdog timer to reboot if ever needed, but it hasn't been so far in two years. If you want to do an embedded type of application, there are some products around optimised with what's needed. I've used Advantech stuff a few times with good results. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Loading Kids Movies into TIVO | layne | Tivo personal television | 3 | March 5th 06 08:31 PM |
| DirecTv D10 autotune and D10-300 reminder trouble / JVC DR-M10 satellite auto recording trouble | [email protected] | Satellite dbs | 8 | June 21st 05 12:48 AM |
| "failed while loading series" error during setup on Sony SVR 2000 | Zak | Tivo personal television | 8 | June 7th 04 01:36 AM |
| "Failed while loading series." | John Franklin James reordberend | Tivo personal television | 5 | December 13th 03 03:39 PM |
| "Failed While Loading Series" Last Call Status | Chuck Mattsen | Tivo personal television | 0 | August 3rd 03 04:09 PM |