![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Check it out.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/20/technology/dreamworks_paramount.reut/?postversion=2007082015 I am a bit surprised that this information hasn't been posted here, yet. It's been around for more than 8 hours. Does anyone here care about HD on DVD? Matthew -- I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one. Which one do you want? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
Check it out. http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/20/technology/dreamworks_paramount.reut/?postversion=2007082015 I am a bit surprised that this information hasn't been posted here, yet. It's been around for more than 8 hours. Does anyone here care about HD on DVD? Matthew -- I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one. Which one do you want? I think the whole point might be moot if high speed internet can bring you what ever movie you want with the press of a button and video on demand will also cut into DVD of any sort? Maybe I'm missing something or the people that don't have Video on demand etc. or live in the country and don't have cable but here I can watch many shows in HDTV on demand with 5.1 surround with out leaving my chair. YMMV, Rich |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:49:59 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"
wrote: snip Does anyone here care about HD on DVD? Matthew Not much. HD on DVD seems to me to be a solution in search of a problem. -- Charlie Hoffpauir http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~charlieh/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:24:06 -0500, "Rich"
wrote: I think the whole point might be moot if high speed internet can bring you what ever movie you want with the press of a button and video on demand will also cut into DVD of any sort? Maybe I'm missing something or the people that don't have Video on demand etc. or live in the country and don't have cable but here I can watch many shows in HDTV on demand with 5.1 surround with out leaving my chair. YMMV, Rich I dropped Time-Warner Cable for Dish Network a few months ago. I don't remember TWC having a very large collection of HD movies available on demand. And the ones they did have were $4.99 a pop IIRC. Meanwhile Netflix and Blockbuster have a fairly large collection of HD movies (Blockbuster has 350 BR and 300 HD-DVD right now) and they are a lot cheaper through their subscription-type services. The problem comes in deciding which way for the consumer to go. Not too long ago there was a huge gulf between the cost of a BR and a HD-DVD player; however, the gap is closing. But if I pick one, then I know I'm eliminating the possibility of seeing some movies in HD. In the meantime, I'm pretty happy with the way my $59 Sylvania DVD player does 1080P uprezzing over HDMI. I'll wait awhile to see how it shakes out. -- Dave Clary/Corpus Christi, TX http://davidclary.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , "Matthew
L. Martin" wrote: Check it out. http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/20/tech...reut/?postvers ion=2007082015 I am a bit surprised that this information hasn't been posted here, yet. It's been around for more than 8 hours. Does anyone here care about HD on DVD? Raises hand. So, HD-DVD now has exclusives with Universal and Paramount; BR continues to have Sony, MGM, Fox, Disney. Seems like a lose-lose. So, I'm sitting on the fence and there I plan to be until this distasteful format war is concluded. I don't really feel like giving any of these jerks $200 (HDDVD) to $500 (Blu-Ray) and then only be able to access about 2/3 of the available content. Maybe I'll decide at some point that there is a critical mass of gotta-have *games* for one of (or both!) 360/PS3 and then I'll get one. But till then ... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Raises hand. So, HD-DVD now has exclusives with Universal and Paramount; BR continues to have Sony, MGM, Fox, Disney. Seems like a lose-lose. So, I'm sitting on the fence and there I plan to be until this distasteful format war is concluded. I don't really feel like giving any of these jerks $200 (HDDVD) to $500 (Blu-Ray) and then only be able to access about 2/3 of the available content. Maybe I'll decide at some point that there is a critical mass of gotta-have *games* for one of (or both!) 360/PS3 and then I'll get one. But till then ... I'm right there with you. Just this morning, I commented to a friend that I thought Blu-Ray was going to be the winner, since only Universal was HD-DVD-only. With the expected price drops this winter, I was planning on asking Santa for a BR player. Now, I'm right back up on the fence again. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:49:59 -0400 Matthew L. Martin wrote:
| Check it out. | | http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/20/technology/dreamworks_paramount.reut/?postversion=2007082015 | | I am a bit surprised that this information hasn't been posted here, yet. | It's been around for more than 8 hours. | | Does anyone here care about HD on DVD? Not me. HD on DVD will be way too short for me. I'd go with HD on Blu-Ray. Then at least you can get a whole HD movie on one disk. -- |---------------------------------------/----------------------------------| | Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below | | first name lower case at ipal.net / | |------------------------------------/-------------------------------------| |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good for Paramount and Dreamworks. Hurray for HD-DVD! That will give SONY
something to think about. SONY is a follower, not a leader. Too overtly aggressive for their own good. What is more important is the good of the buyer. (Target & Blockbuster blew this one didn't they?) Regardless, see no reason to add either format until such time that I add a LARGE screen. SONY has been chomping away at the 1920x1080 market ever since they and NHK brought us HD. Loosing the tape market was a serious hurt. Does anyone here care about HD on DVD? No, not really. "Matthew L. Martin" wrote in message .. . Check it out. http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/20/technology/dreamworks_paramount.reut/?postversion=2007082015 I am a bit surprised that this information hasn't been posted here, yet. It's been around for more than 8 hours. Does anyone here care about HD on DVD? Matthew -- I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one. Which one do you want? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:07:56 GMT, kjw wrote:
Now, I'm right back up on the fence again. Me too! Lets see what happens after Christmas. That might be the straw that will make up the camel's mind... VBG. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article [email protected],
"WGD" wrote: Good for Paramount and Dreamworks. Hurray for HD-DVD! That will give SONY something to think about. SONY is a follower, not a leader. Too overtly aggressive for their own good. How can they be a 'follower' and 'too overtly aggressive'? -- Tom Stiller PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Paramount Audio on T6-24 | Tape Mann | Satellite tvro | 2 | October 8th 03 09:05 PM |
| Paramount 2 | Dene Wilby | UK sky | 1 | September 1st 03 05:12 PM |
| Paramount 2 | PeterL | UK sky | 2 | August 28th 03 04:35 PM |
| Paramount 2 | David Marshall | UK sky | 6 | August 13th 03 10:29 AM |
| Hey, Paramount logo off | STEVE9091UK | UK sky | 0 | August 1st 03 08:13 PM |