![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does anybody know how the Standby Saver worked that was featured on Dragons'
Den? The website for it and what it claims to do is he http://www.standby-saver.co.uk/stand...r_products.htm "The standby saver responds to the "standby" and "on" buttons of the TVs or Audio systems original remote control and switches the power to the equipment on and off as needed. While the TV and other equipment is in the standby mode the power used by the equipment including the standby saver is zero." I've found some mention elsewhere that they use a rechargeable battery to power the receiver that detects the signal from the remote control, so surely all they've actually achieved is to move the point at which power is consumed by the remote control detector from the TV or whatever device onto their Standby Saver plug socket, and their claim of zero power consumption is false advertising because they're claiming to have invented a perpetual motion machine. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"DAB sounds worse than FM" [email protected] wrote in message
news ![]() Does anybody know how the Standby Saver worked that was featured on Dragons' Den? The website for it and what it claims to do is he http://www.standby-saver.co.uk/stand...r_products.htm "The standby saver responds to the "standby" and "on" buttons of the TVs or Audio systems original remote control and switches the power to the equipment on and off as needed. While the TV and other equipment is in the standby mode the power used by the equipment including the standby saver is zero." I've found some mention elsewhere that they use a rechargeable battery to power the receiver that detects the signal from the remote control, so surely all they've actually achieved is to move the point at which power is consumed by the remote control detector from the TV or whatever device onto their Standby Saver plug socket, and their claim of zero power consumption is false advertising because they're claiming to have invented a perpetual motion machine. Don't mention Dragon's Den to me. The *******s wouldn't even consider my idea of ejector seats for helicopter pilots. (kim) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
"The standby saver responds to the "standby" and "on" buttons of the TVs or Audio systems original remote control and switches the power to the equipment on and off as needed. While the TV and other equipment is in the standby mode the power used by the equipment including the standby saver is zero." I've found some mention elsewhere that they use a rechargeable battery to power the receiver that detects the signal from the remote control, so surely all they've actually achieved is to move the point at which power is consumed by the remote control detector from the TV or whatever device onto their Standby Saver plug socket, and their claim of zero power consumption is false advertising because they're claiming to have invented a perpetual motion machine. Well their claim can be "technically" correct - in that after you have turned it off, there is no power consumption at all from the mains until you turn it back on. In energy terms there is slight of hand going on, in that the battery must be charged when the system is "on". However the big advantage is it makes it easy enough to turn of a bunch of related bits of equipment with a single remote button push, that folks might actually do it. (as to how much real value that really offers is a different question!) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 01:09:55 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
[email protected] wrote: Does anybody know how the Standby Saver worked that was featured on Dragons' Den? I've found some mention elsewhere that they use a rechargeable battery to power the receiver that detects the signal from the remote control, so surely all they've actually achieved is to move the point at which power is consumed by the remote control detector from the TV or whatever device onto their Standby Saver plug socket, and their claim of zero power consumption is false advertising because they're claiming to have invented a perpetual motion machine. What did you expect? The EU target of a 1-watt standby mode is not achievable with current technology. Standby Saver might be useful if you use it to control an entire AV rack (except Video/PVR). Nick. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"kim" wrote in message ... "DAB sounds worse than FM" [email protected] wrote in message news ![]() Does anybody know how the Standby Saver worked that was featured on Dragons' Den? The website for it and what it claims to do is he http://www.standby-saver.co.uk/stand...r_products.htm "The standby saver responds to the "standby" and "on" buttons of the TVs or Audio systems original remote control and switches the power to the equipment on and off as needed. While the TV and other equipment is in the standby mode the power used by the equipment including the standby saver is zero." I've found some mention elsewhere that they use a rechargeable battery to power the receiver that detects the signal from the remote control, so surely all they've actually achieved is to move the point at which power is consumed by the remote control detector from the TV or whatever device onto their Standby Saver plug socket, and their claim of zero power consumption is false advertising because they're claiming to have invented a perpetual motion machine. Don't mention Dragon's Den to me. The *******s wouldn't even consider my idea of ejector seats for helicopter pilots. (kim) - or my ashtray for motorbikes. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"DAB sounds worse than FM" [email protected] wrote in message news ![]() Does anybody know how the Standby Saver worked that was featured on Dragons' Den? Report it to ASA if you're SO bothered. Just use the on/off switch instead. Far easier and when the switch is OFF it uses no power. Standby is a waste of time on any equipment. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
Does anybody know how the Standby Saver worked that was featured on Dragons' Den? The website for it and what it claims to do is he http://www.standby-saver.co.uk/stand...r_products.htm "The standby saver responds to the "standby" and "on" buttons of the TVs or Audio systems original remote control and switches the power to the equipment on and off as needed. While the TV and other equipment is in the standby mode the power used by the equipment including the standby saver is zero." I've found some mention elsewhere that they use a rechargeable battery to power the receiver that detects the signal from the remote control, so surely all they've actually achieved is to move the point at which power is consumed by the remote control detector from the TV or whatever device onto their Standby Saver plug socket, and their claim of zero power consumption is false advertising because they're claiming to have invented a perpetual motion machine. Holy carp - I was building electronic switches like these for PCs in the mid-late 1980s to turn off the monitor when it sensed that the base unit was powered down - this was before monitors could sense this for themselves and when PC manufacturers stopped putting a secondary socket on the PSUs for the monitor. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:01:59 +0100, "Ron" wrote:
Report it to ASA if you're SO bothered. Just use the on/off switch instead. Far easier and when the switch is OFF it uses no power. Standby is a waste of time on any equipment. Yeah, who wants their PVR to actually record things. -- Andrew, contact via http://interpleb.googlepages.com Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards, please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text. Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ron wrote:
"DAB sounds worse than FM" [email protected] wrote in message news ![]() Does anybody know how the Standby Saver worked that was featured on Dragons' Den? Report it to ASA if you're SO bothered. I'm not bothered. Just use the on/off switch instead. Far easier and when the switch is OFF it uses no power. Standby is a waste of time on any equipment. Yeah, that's why nobody ever puts any device into standby, moron. -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Rumm wrote:
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote: "The standby saver responds to the "standby" and "on" buttons of the TVs or Audio systems original remote control and switches the power to the equipment on and off as needed. While the TV and other equipment is in the standby mode the power used by the equipment including the standby saver is zero." I've found some mention elsewhere that they use a rechargeable battery to power the receiver that detects the signal from the remote control, so surely all they've actually achieved is to move the point at which power is consumed by the remote control detector from the TV or whatever device onto their Standby Saver plug socket, and their claim of zero power consumption is false advertising because they're claiming to have invented a perpetual motion machine. Well their claim can be "technically" correct - in that after you have turned it off, there is no power consumption at all from the mains until you turn it back on. In energy terms there is slight of hand going on, in that the battery must be charged when the system is "on". Indeed - otherwise it would be a perpetual motion machine. However the big advantage is it makes it easy enough to turn of a bunch of related bits of equipment with a single remote button push, that folks might actually do it. True. (as to how much real value that really offers is a different question!) £24.99's worth, apparently. ;-) -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TV going in to standby. | BrritSki | UK sky | 4 | April 25th 06 02:57 PM |
| why is screnn saver cut in on me will I am watching Tv? | FatDaddy | High definition TV | 0 | September 15th 04 08:16 PM |
| Dishnetwork BUG 322 screen saver removal instructions to regain recording device functionality. | Satellite dbs | 0 | March 25th 04 01:00 AM | |
| Screen Saver? | Steven Q. Perkoff | High definition TV | 8 | January 1st 04 12:07 AM |
| Screen Saver? | Steven Q. Perkoff | High definition TV | 0 | December 30th 03 09:15 AM |