The End of Free OTA

On 7 Aug 2007 12:09:31 GMT, wrote:

In alt.tv.tech.hdtv wrote:
| On 7 Aug 2007 01:54:24 GMT, wrote:
|
|In alt.tv.tech.hdtv wrote:
|
| Let's see how much more pompous you can possibly get.
|
|With MLM, whatever it takes.
|
| What do you hope to accomplish, in regard to Mr, Martin, by becoming
| more and more pompous in your postings?

Maybe you should actually take a look and see who is the more pompous.

Oh, I see. You're engaging in a pomposity contest with him. That's a
curious thing to do with someone you appear to despise.

BW

In article ,
wrote:

On 7 Aug 2007 12:09:31 GMT, wrote:

In alt.tv.tech.hdtv wrote:
| On 7 Aug 2007 01:54:24 GMT, wrote:
|
|In alt.tv.tech.hdtv wrote:
|
| Let's see how much more pompous you can possibly get.
|
|With MLM, whatever it takes.
|
| What do you hope to accomplish, in regard to Mr, Martin, by becoming
| more and more pompous in your postings?

Maybe you should actually take a look and see who is the more pompous.

Oh, I see. You're engaging in a pomposity contest with him. That's a
curious thing to do with someone you appear to despise.

Not if you're playing to lose. But if that's Phil's strategy, it's not
working.

Maybe it'd help if he understood the meaning of the word "pompous". I
don't think he does.

--
- Doctroid Doctroid Holmes
It's too confused to make sense, so let's make nonsense.
-- Chris McG.

* Matthew L. Martin wrote, On 06/08/07 06:39 PM:
wrote:
On 6 Aug 2007 20:00:42 GMT, wrote:
It is an instruction (to MLM) "to ponder" (the point) rather than to
treat
it as a question to be answered. It basically mean "hey you (MLM), I
hereby
instruct you to ponder this point".

Not a suggestion, not a request, not a hope or wish, but an
instruction.

Let's see how much more pompous you can possibly get.


Poor old phil is pretty puffed up about himself. He reminds me of the
smallest rooster in the flock. Lots of puff, lots of noise and no hens.

So Phil is the smallest cock.

--

anTon O'Masia [ antonomasia at gmail dot com ]

"anTonOMasia" wrote

It is an instruction (to MLM) "to ponder" (the point) rather than to
treat
it as a question to be answered. It basically mean "hey you (MLM), I
hereby
instruct you to ponder this point".

Not a suggestion, not a request, not a hope or wish, but an
instruction.

Let's see how much more pompous you can possibly get.

Poor old phil is pretty puffed up about himself. He reminds me of the
smallest rooster in the flock. Lots of puff, lots of noise and no hens.

So Phil is the smallest cock.

Michael Vick ain't got nothing on you guys.

--oTTo--

wrote:
In alt.tv.tech.hdtv wrote:
| On 7 Aug 2007 01:54:24 GMT, wrote:
|In alt.tv.tech.hdtv wrote:
| Let's see how much more pompous you can possibly get.
|
|With MLM, whatever it takes.
|
| What do you hope to accomplish, in regard to Mr, Martin, by becoming
| more and more pompous in your postings?

Maybe you should actually take a look and see who is the more pompous.

....darn, my pompometer just ran out of pixels. Hold him off for a bit while
I reload, mm'kay?

Dave "totally resisting the urge to kowtow. like, TOTALLY" DeLaney

PS: Where to apply the FNARR to this post may be on the exam, so I hope you're
taking NOTES!
--
\/David DeLaney posting from "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeableBLINK
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

On Aug 7, 8:46 am, anTonOMasia wrote:
* Matthew L. Martin wrote, On 06/08/07 06:39 PM:



wrote:
On 6 Aug 2007 20:00:42 GMT, wrote:
It is an instruction (to MLM) "to ponder" (the point) rather than to
treat
it as a question to be answered. It basically mean "hey you (MLM), I
hereby
instruct you to ponder this point".

Not a suggestion, not a request, not a hope or wish, but an
instruction.

Let's see how much more pompous you can possibly get.

Poor old phil is pretty puffed up about himself. He reminds me of the
smallest rooster in the flock. Lots of puff, lots of noise and no hens.

So Phil is the smallest cock.

Why is it always roosters and chickems with youse people?


--

anTon O'Masia [ antonomasia at gmail dot com ]

"leo sgouros"

It is an instruction (to MLM) "to ponder" (the point) rather than to
treat
it as a question to be answered. It basically mean "hey you (MLM), I
hereby
instruct you to ponder this point".

Not a suggestion, not a request, not a hope or wish, but an
instruction.

Let's see how much more pompous you can possibly get.

Poor old phil is pretty puffed up about himself. He reminds me of the
smallest rooster in the flock. Lots of puff, lots of noise and no hens.

So Phil is the smallest cock.

Why is it always roosters and chickems with youse people?

True grit.

--oTTo--

Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
In article ,
TMG wrote:

One doesn't have to pay to hook every TV to a pay service, but then
you're deliberately ignoring that--or else you're tres stupid.

Ummm, we do. Our cable contract specifically mandates a one to one ratio .

With a cable box or without?

Yes

With a cable box, sure. But without? That would be stupid.

So you're saying we should steal service.

"TMG" wrote

One doesn't have to pay to hook every TV to a pay service, but then
you're deliberately ignoring that--or else you're tres stupid.

Ummm, we do. Our cable contract specifically mandates a one to one ratio .

With a cable box or without?

Yes

With a cable box, sure. But without? That would be stupid.

So you're saying we should steal service.

It isn't stealing till they find out about it. If you don't order any
Pay-For-View, you'll be fine.

--oTTo--

TMG wrote:
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
In article ,
TMG wrote:

One doesn't have to pay to hook every TV to a pay service, but then
you're deliberately ignoring that--or else you're tres stupid.

Ummm, we do. Our cable contract specifically mandates a one to one
ratio .

With a cable box or without?

Yes

With a cable box, sure. But without? That would be stupid.

So you're saying we should steal service.

In most areas, cable companies don't charge for extra outlets
unless there is a box necessary. You can add outlets to cable
ready televisions without charge.

Chip

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB