![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm looking to spend about $2000 and would like to stick with LCD or
Plasma. But for the $2000, I can't buy anything bigger than a 46" (Sharp open box ~$1700) which is 1080p, but I'm more likely looking at a 40-42". But from what I've been reading, many people say just move up to a 50"+ (Panasonic, for example) 720p and the difference is likely not going to be noticeable. We'd likely be sitting about 10 feet away. So I'm just wondering if anyone would have more suggestions on whether a somewhat non-trained eye would even notice a difference. We really just want something to watch HD-DVDs on and enjoy the better picture (than our cheap tube TV). I just have to wonder if I'll ever be sitting in front of a 50" 720p Panasonic thinking: "Gosh, I wish I had gone with a smaller 1080p set"... And in a year or two, we'd likely re- visit a new primary 1080p set when the prices come down a bit more... Any feedback would be really appreciated. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8/5/07 7:28 PM, Steve wrote:
I'm looking to spend about $2000 and would like to stick with LCD or Plasma. But for the $2000, I can't buy anything bigger than a 46" (Sharp open box ~$1700) which is 1080p, but I'm more likely looking at a 40-42". But from what I've been reading, many people say just move up to a 50"+ (Panasonic, for example) 720p and the difference is likely not going to be noticeable. We'd likely be sitting about 10 feet away. So I'm just wondering if anyone would have more suggestions on whether a somewhat non-trained eye would even notice a difference. We really just want something to watch HD-DVDs on and enjoy the better picture (than our cheap tube TV). I just have to wonder if I'll ever be sitting in front of a 50" 720p Panasonic thinking: "Gosh, I wish I had gone with a smaller 1080p set"... And in a year or two, we'd likely re- visit a new primary 1080p set when the prices come down a bit more... Any feedback would be really appreciated. If you are watching a lot of sports and may hook up a game system, go plasma. At 10' a 42" should do. Go to a store and sit back 10' to get an idea. Or cut a piece of cardboard and put where you want the TV to get an idea. You will not notice a difference in picture resolution of 1080 vs 720 on a 42" set under normal viewing. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:18:07 -0500, Dan wrote:
On 8/5/07 7:28 PM, Steve wrote: I'm looking to spend about $2000 and would like to stick with LCD or Plasma. But for the $2000, I can't buy anything bigger than a 46" (Sharp open box ~$1700) which is 1080p, but I'm more likely looking at a 40-42". But from what I've been reading, many people say just move up to a 50"+ (Panasonic, for example) 720p and the difference is likely not going to be noticeable. We'd likely be sitting about 10 feet away. So I'm just wondering if anyone would have more suggestions on whether a somewhat non-trained eye would even notice a difference. We really just want something to watch HD-DVDs on and enjoy the better picture (than our cheap tube TV). I just have to wonder if I'll ever be sitting in front of a 50" 720p Panasonic thinking: "Gosh, I wish I had gone with a smaller 1080p set"... And in a year or two, we'd likely re- visit a new primary 1080p set when the prices come down a bit more... Any feedback would be really appreciated. If you are watching a lot of sports and may hook up a game system, go plasma. At 10' a 42" should do. Go to a store and sit back 10' to get an idea. Or cut a piece of cardboard and put where you want the TV to get an idea. You will not notice a difference in picture resolution of 1080 vs 720 on a 42" set under normal viewing. OTH a 50"+ at 10' with x * 768 pixels might be pushing it and you risk being able to see the pixels, which is not a good thing. To perceive a smooth natural image you should determine at what distance you can see the pixel structure and then increase the distance to make sure that the pixels blend together. With my rule of thumb (scaled from 37" LCD sets) a 42" with 1366x768 pixels has a sweet spot at about 9'. A 52" with 1366x768 pixels has a sweet spot at about 11'. If you go for the larger size, check that you don't get disturbed by the pixel structure. (The larger size also makes quality problems in the material more obvious.) /Jan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article .com,
Steve wrote: [...] So I'm just wondering if anyone would have more suggestions on whether a somewhat non-trained eye would even notice a difference. We really just want something to watch HD-DVDs on and enjoy the better picture (than our cheap tube TV). I just have to wonder if I'll ever be sitting in front of a 50" 720p Panasonic thinking: "Gosh, I wish I had gone with a smaller 1080p set"... And in a year or two, we'd likely re- visit a new primary 1080p set when the prices come down a bit more... Steve, you've received some good feedback, but I think the most honest answer is: "it depends". There's a lot of data, a lot of info, and a lot of (sometimes very subjective) opinion that goes into picking a set. I have a 3+ yr old 50" LCD rear-pro that I watch from about 10 ft. When I first put it in the living room, I thought it was HUGE. It looked terrible with std def. But now that I watch all in digital (not all HD) the latter looks better. And you get used to the size to the point where I would be reluctant to downsize. Many will cite optimal distances, heck, I've done that too. But it really comes down to what you like and want. Try to check TV's out in friends houses to get an idea. And, of course, at the store from your planned distance. Though I think the latter can be deceiving in a big open store with lots of lights. As to the nagging thought about "shoulda got 1080p", rational or not, I'd share it. I've convinced 5 people to get the 42" or 50" Panny 720p plasma, and I'm sure they all made the best choice at the time. But if I had to do it today, I'd be on the fence as to 50" 720p or spending the extra $500 or more for 1080p just because of that nagging doubt. It's hard to pay $2000 knowing that it doesn't included the latest buzzword technology. And, of course, there's a lot more to a TV than size and max resolution. I love the Panny picture. I'm still wary of LCD contrast/blacklevel/shadow detail / whatever you want to call them. Sorry if this doesn't give you much factual guidance, but I think you as much have to go with your gut. Good hunting! Dave |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Suggestions Needed | Mikael | Home theater (general) | 1 | July 24th 05 02:50 AM |
| Home theater diagram suggestions needed | [email protected] | Home theater (general) | 5 | December 16th 04 09:14 PM |
| Best PQ next to Plasma Suggestions needed | Craig Lambert | Home theater (general) | 5 | February 11th 04 09:05 AM |
| Newb: Coax to VCR, VCR S-Video to HDTV | Duncan, Eric A. | Home theater (general) | 2 | September 9th 03 08:56 PM |
| Newb request for 7.1 speaker suggestions | Slowcorrado | Home theater (general) | 0 | August 13th 03 07:16 PM |