39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

On 2007-07-22 18:16:43 -0400, Donald McDaniel said:

One such Man comes readily to my "ignorant, unwise mind". But I won't tell
y'all His Name. You'll have to use your "superior knowledge and wisdom" and
make a good guess. Anyone who knows me should be able to say His common Name
immediately. Unless, of course, they are so hateful toward Him that they
can't bare to mention it publicly.

That guru that a budding organization, now the Vatican Corp., decided
to deify? Don't overglorify him. He was by no means right all the time,
nor is he a deity

Speaking of not being able to "bare" to mention it, may I remind you of
your comment that "[t]heir English grammar, spelling, and comprehension
leave much to be desired when compared with even the common knowledge
of most 19th Century Americans."

"The Constitution does not give the People the right to impeach anyone in
the Federal Government. That right is strictly granted to the US Senate."


Gee! All this time I thought it was the House that impeached a president
and the Senate that tried the president.

--
Bearman

America: Land of the free because of the brave.

On 2007-07-22 20:14:16 -0400, "bearman" said:


"The Constitution does not give the People the right to impeach anyone in
the Federal Government. That right is strictly granted to the US Senate."


Gee! All this time I thought it was the House that impeached a president
and the Senate that tried the president.

Good grief! You mean it makes you upset when a person who shows every
sign of being a prime know-it-all comes up with a real booboo like that?

"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-22 20:14:16 -0400, "bearman" said:


"The Constitution does not give the People the right to impeach anyone
in
the Federal Government. That right is strictly granted to the US
Senate."


Gee! All this time I thought it was the House that impeached a president
and the Senate that tried the president.

Good grief! You mean it makes you upset when a person who shows every sign
of being a prime know-it-all comes up with a real booboo like that?


Who's upset?

On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:24:56 -0700, Dr zara wrote
(in article ):

I like to look at the American Revolution.



I guess it really depends on which side of the "surge" you are on, doesn't
it.

The British Crown certainly saw the "impudent Colonials" as "insurgents",
while the Colonials certainly saw themselves as "patriots".

It's always the ones who WIN who get to write the History Books, not the ones
who LOSE.

In article om,
Donald McDaniel wrote:

On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:24:56 -0700, Dr zara wrote
(in article ):

I like to look at the American Revolution.



I guess it really depends on which side of the "surge" you are on, doesn't
it.

The British Crown certainly saw the "impudent Colonials" as "insurgents",
while the Colonials certainly saw themselves as "patriots".

It's always the ones who WIN who get to write the History Books, not the ones
who LOSE.

And that is not true. The Japanese write their own history books and
they are quite different than the American, Australian, Chinese, or
Philippine.

"Donald McDaniel" wrote in message
nc.com...
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:24:56 -0700, Dr zara wrote
(in article ):

I like to look at the American Revolution.



I guess it really depends on which side of the "surge" you are on, doesn't
it.

The British Crown certainly saw the "impudent Colonials" as "insurgents",
while the Colonials certainly saw themselves as "patriots".

It's always the ones who WIN who get to write the History Books, not the
ones
who LOSE.


And Sunni's and Shia's have been killing and maiming each other for years.
Look at Algeria as a prime example.

"Patriots" don't make their point by blowing up their countries mothers,
fathers, and children as they try to pursue normal lives. There is
nothing patriotic about what terrorists are doing.

Calif Bill wrote:
"Donald McDaniel" wrote in message
nc.com...

On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:24:56 -0700, Dr zara wrote
(in article ):


I like to look at the American Revolution.



I guess it really depends on which side of the "surge" you are on, doesn't
it.

The British Crown certainly saw the "impudent Colonials" as "insurgents",
while the Colonials certainly saw themselves as "patriots".

It's always the ones who WIN who get to write the History Books, not the
ones
who LOSE.



And Sunni's and Shia's have been killing and maiming each other for years.
Look at Algeria as a prime example.

"Patriots" don't make their point by blowing up their countries mothers,
fathers, and children as they try to pursue normal lives. There is
nothing patriotic about what terrorists are doing.

Calif Bill wrote:
"Donald McDaniel" wrote in message
nc.com...

On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 06:24:56 -0700, Dr zara wrote
(in article ):


I like to look at the American Revolution.



I guess it really depends on which side of the "surge" you are on, doesn't
it.

The British Crown certainly saw the "impudent Colonials" as "insurgents",
while the Colonials certainly saw themselves as "patriots".

It's always the ones who WIN who get to write the History Books, not the
ones
who LOSE.



And Sunni's and Shia's have been killing and maiming each other for years.
Look at Algeria as a prime example.

"sailor409" wrote in message
...
"Patriots" don't make their point by blowing up their countries mothers,
fathers, and children as they try to pursue normal lives. There is nothing
patriotic about what terrorists are doing.


And amazingly, the question still remains: "What have the terrorists gained
for themselves after all the destruction of property and loss of life and
limb?" Answer: "Nothing whatever." KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and
NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators!
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/