![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi
Does anyone think that Sky customers will get Setanta free like the Virgin customers are getting. Thanks from Eddie |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"tim" wrote in message ... Hi Does anyone think that Sky customers will get Setanta free like the Virgin customers are getting. Thanks from Eddie No chance. Sky would just be giving money to one of their biggest bidding rivals. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes this is true but they will lose a vast amount of existing customers who
will change over to Virgin because if you get the basic package with them you still get Setanta sports free... "tim" wrote in message ... Hi Does anyone think that Sky customers will get Setanta free like the Virgin customers are getting. Thanks from Eddie |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , tim
writes Yes this is true but they will lose a vast amount of existing customers who will change over to Virgin because if you get the basic package with them you still get Setanta sports free... Don't you have to be on the top package with Virgin to get Setanta sports free? Most of the Sky subscribers who are paying a similar price are going to be on the top package, including Sky Sports where they'll still be getting more football. I believe Sky get first pick of the matches anyway, so Setanta are getting "second-rate" football anyway. -- Sean Black |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sean Black" wrote in message ... In article , tim writes Yes this is true but they will lose a vast amount of existing customers who will change over to Virgin because if you get the basic package with them you still get Setanta sports free... Don't you have to be on the top package with Virgin to get Setanta sports free? Most of the Sky subscribers who are paying a similar price are going to be on the top package, including Sky Sports where they'll still be getting more football. I believe Sky get first pick of the matches anyway, so Setanta are getting "second-rate" football anyway. -- Sean Black I believe the packages were split equally , just that Setanta bought only one of them. -- RobertJM |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
RobertJM writes "Sean Black" wrote in message ... In article , tim writes Yes this is true but they will lose a vast amount of existing customers who will change over to Virgin because if you get the basic package with them you still get Setanta sports free... Don't you have to be on the top package with Virgin to get Setanta sports free? Most of the Sky subscribers who are paying a similar price are going to be on the top package, including Sky Sports where they'll still be getting more football. I believe Sky get first pick of the matches anyway, so Setanta are getting "second-rate" football anyway. -- Sean Black I believe the packages were split equally , just that Setanta bought only one of them. Setanta got the old Prem Plus package which was always very much the lesser games after the main Sunday 4pm pick, that's why they had to wait until after Sky had announced their TV games to pick theirs. It'd be interesting to see what sort of take up they're getting. Whilst it's probably a pretty decent deal if you've got no access at present to Premiership football, but if like me, you've already got Sky Sports and for the last few years have been getting Prem Plus for a pound a game, it's a crap deal (not to mention it won't be in HD either). Good excuse to go down the pub though, I suppose :-) -- Sean Black |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sean Black wrote:
: It'd be interesting to see what sort of take up they're getting. Whilst : it's probably a pretty decent deal if you've got no access at present to : Premiership football, but if like me, you've already got Sky Sports and : for the last few years have been getting Prem Plus for a pound a game, : it's a crap deal (not to mention it won't be in HD either). Good excuse : to go down the pub though, I suppose :-) Setanta are not, apparently, doing very well at all (hence the Virgin Deal, reduction of *NEW* Sky/Freeview subscriptions to £9.95/month and no 12 months minimum). They need well over a million subscribers and have ~200,000 so far. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brian McIlwrath" wrote in message ... Sean Black wrote: : It'd be interesting to see what sort of take up they're getting. Whilst : it's probably a pretty decent deal if you've got no access at present to : Premiership football, but if like me, you've already got Sky Sports and : for the last few years have been getting Prem Plus for a pound a game, : it's a crap deal (not to mention it won't be in HD either). Good excuse : to go down the pub though, I suppose :-) Setanta are not, apparently, doing very well at all (hence the Virgin Deal, reduction of *NEW* Sky/Freeview subscriptions to £9.95/month and no 12 months minimum). They need well over a million subscribers and have ~200,000 so far. ITVdigital anyone? I can't see them converting freeview viewers - they are just not used to paying. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , steeler
writes "Brian McIlwrath" wrote in message ... Sean Black wrote: : It'd be interesting to see what sort of take up they're getting. Whilst : it's probably a pretty decent deal if you've got no access at present to : Premiership football, but if like me, you've already got Sky Sports and : for the last few years have been getting Prem Plus for a pound a game, : it's a crap deal (not to mention it won't be in HD either). Good excuse : to go down the pub though, I suppose :-) Setanta are not, apparently, doing very well at all (hence the Virgin Deal, reduction of *NEW* Sky/Freeview subscriptions to £9.95/month and no 12 months minimum). They need well over a million subscribers and have ~200,000 so far. ITVdigital anyone? I can't see them converting freeview viewers - they are just not used to paying. Looks like it's all going to end in tears then, well done to the EU :-) I don't know what they hoped to achieve by making the Premier League sell the rights the way they have. I know it was supposed to make it a better deal for the viewer, but I can't see how it has helped anyone. Sky viewers are now having to pay more to see the same amount of football as they did last year. The only way I can see it being better for the viewers is if the EU made them make the rights non-exclusive, so anyone could put on any games, so there'd at least be some proper competition, but I can't see any way to do that. -- Sean Black |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sean Black" wrote in message ... In article , steeler writes "Brian McIlwrath" wrote in message ... Sean Black wrote: : It'd be interesting to see what sort of take up they're getting. Whilst : it's probably a pretty decent deal if you've got no access at present to : Premiership football, but if like me, you've already got Sky Sports and : for the last few years have been getting Prem Plus for a pound a game, : it's a crap deal (not to mention it won't be in HD either). Good excuse : to go down the pub though, I suppose :-) Setanta are not, apparently, doing very well at all (hence the Virgin Deal, reduction of *NEW* Sky/Freeview subscriptions to £9.95/month and no 12 months minimum). They need well over a million subscribers and have ~200,000 so far. ITVdigital anyone? I can't see them converting freeview viewers - they are just not used to paying. Looks like it's all going to end in tears then, well done to the EU :-) I don't know what they hoped to achieve by making the Premier League sell the rights the way they have. I know it was supposed to make it a better deal for the viewer, but I can't see how it has helped anyone. Sky viewers are now having to pay more to see the same amount of football as they did last year. They hoped a terrestrial channel would win some and they would be lauded for supplying free football to the nation. Only they could not stop pay channels from outbidding as that would be anti-competative - the very claim they leveled at the old method of bidding. The only way I can see it being better for the viewers is if the EU made them make the rights non-exclusive, so anyone could put on any games, so there'd at least be some proper competition, but I can't see any way to do that. -- The only way you could do that is if each club was allowed to negotiate it's own contracts. The big clubs would love this but the little clubs would always vote down any proposals - what with every channel wanting Man U vs. Liverpool and nobody wanting West Ham vs. Bolton (no offence). |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ! ♥ WWW . E Z O C A M . C O M ♥ LARGEST FREE To JOIN - "LiVE" CAM CHAT COMMUNITY ♥ Site ! JOIN In The FUN NOW !★ | www.EZOCAM.COM[_2_] | UK digital tv | 0 | June 29th 07 12:41 PM |
| Best Price For Series 2 80 Hour With Price Drop? | zippychimp | Tivo personal television | 0 | February 3rd 04 04:01 AM |