Final Evening of Analog TV?

wrote:
I'm complaining that Matthew L. Martin makes assumptions
about facts he knows nothing about (he's not behind me watching what I do
on the internet, and he doesn't have a bug in my computer to spy on me),

.... you're _sure_ of this?

Dave "because, like, it would be _perfect_ for youtube" DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeableBLINK
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

Leonard Caillouet wrote:
wrote in message
...
In alt.tv.tech.hdtv Matthew L. Martin wrote:
| wrote:
| In alt.tv.tech.hdtv Matthew L. Martin wrote:
| | Bill R wrote:
| | Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
| |
| | In article ,
| | "Matthew L. Martin" wrote:
| |
| |
| | Some stations have already abandoned analog broadcasts.
| |
| |
| | Bull****, of course, but what should we expect from you.
| |
| |
| | What is BS about that? It is true; in some cities stations have
already
| | shutoff their analog stations.
| |
| | Your correspondent believes his opinions to be true facts. Reality
does
| | not matter to him.
| |
| | I always check my nonsense before I post it to the interweb.
| |
| | Matthew
|
| Actually, I believe you secretly don't check a damned thing. You just
| spout lies and label them with "check your facts" so that people thing
| you are such cool stuff.
|
|
| Considering that I have refuted much of what you have posted in the last
| few days with the real facts, you should reconsider posting at all, you
| ignorant, self centered blow hard.

There are no facts from you at all.

Cross posting deleted.

Actually, even though Matthew and I both think each other are assholes, I
have learned quite a lot more from him than I have from you Phil.

I could say the very same thing, but it wouldn't be true. I only think
you're an asshole when you top post.

Matthew

--
I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one.
Which one do you want?

In alt.tv.tech.hdtv TMG wrote:

| wrote:
|
| I'm not complaining about him disagreeing or about him trying to be seen
| as disagreeing.
|
| Hmmm,..are you disagreeing about his proven habit of being able to get
| you to post long winded pufferism?
|
| Over and over.
|
| Oh,..and over.
|
| waits for the clue to sink in,...waiting,....waiting

Oh, is that what he's trying to do? He could have just asked :-)

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

In alt.tv.tech.hdtv David DeLaney wrote:
| wrote:
|I'm complaining that Matthew L. Martin makes assumptions
|about facts he knows nothing about (he's not behind me watching what I do
|on the internet, and he doesn't have a bug in my computer to spy on me),
|
| ... you're _sure_ of this?

Absolutely. It's a solid Linux system.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

wrote

|I'm complaining that Matthew L. Martin makes assumptions
|about facts he knows nothing about (he's not behind me watching what I do
|on the internet, and he doesn't have a bug in my computer to spy on me),
|
| ... you're _sure_ of this?

Absolutely. It's a solid Linux system.

You are very naive.

--oTTo--

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:19:13 -0400 Leonard Caillouet wrote:

| Actually, even though Matthew and I both think each other are assholes, I
| have learned quite a lot more from him than I have from you Phil. The fact
| is, both aof you are acting like children. You just happen to be wrong a
| heck of a lot more than Matthew Martin.

You have any specific cases you'd like to refer to where I was wrong?

I don't really try to post too many facts here, because I don't know that
many. This isn't my area of expertise. I do post a lot of things that
are opinions, preferences, ideas, etc.

But there are some times where I do state facts. Could I be wrong? Sure,
anyone could be. And when I or anyone else is wrong, someone else should
post something about that and correct it. But what does Matthew L. Martin
do? I'm not sure if he _thinks_ something is wrong or not (he doesn't
usually say that literally). But clearly he posts when he doesn't like
things I or some other people say. He doesn't point out any specific
error that he believes. Instead, he so often prefers to just say "you're
wrong" (not identifying which of many points is wrong) and then sometimes
adds on his personal attcks.

Keep in mind that it is he who starts it. I do respond in kind, then I
stop and see if he will continue. He's been going on quite a few times
this round. But it was that first one way back when that was the longest
and most interesting. I always give him the opportunity to cease. But
eventually I will tire of him and reduce the number of his posts I read,
and hence the number I follow up to.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

In alt.tv.tech.hdtv Otto Bahn wrote:
| wrote
|
| |I'm complaining that Matthew L. Martin makes assumptions
| |about facts he knows nothing about (he's not behind me watching what I do
| |on the internet, and he doesn't have a bug in my computer to spy on me),
| |
| | ... you're _sure_ of this?
|
| Absolutely. It's a solid Linux system.
|
| You are very naive.

And how would you know much about this?

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

wrote:
In alt.tv.tech.hdtv TMG wrote:

| wrote:
|
| I'm not complaining about him disagreeing or about him trying to be seen
| as disagreeing.
|
| Hmmm,..are you disagreeing about his proven habit of being able to get
| you to post long winded pufferism?
|
| Over and over.
|
| Oh,..and over.
|
| waits for the clue to sink in,...waiting,....waiting

Oh, is that what he's trying to do? He could have just asked :-)

No, never, haven't even thought of such a pastime. If that ugly rumor
were true, someone else would have trolled you into yammering on about
some other inane subject. Some sort of "Linux system" - for example, and
how it would be easy to turn your monitor into a two-way camera, so as
to spy on you.

Feel free to comment he ---

"Matthew L. Martin" wrote in message
...
I could say the very same thing, but it wouldn't be true. I only think
you're an asshole when you top post.

sort of like when you cross post...

Actually, you know that I say these things in jest. Just like you, when I
actually think you are being an ass, I'll say so. The point, of course,
that you well understand, is that we all can go off the deep end every now
and then, but at least we can poke a little fun at each other. Phil just
seems to make a habit of being wrong and bitching about those that correct
him, and seems to take everything so personally.

Leonard

Leonard Caillouet wrote:
"Matthew L. Martin" wrote in message
...
I could say the very same thing, but it wouldn't be true. I only think
you're an asshole when you top post.

sort of like when you cross post...

Actually, you know that I say these things in jest. Just like you, when I
actually think you are being an ass, I'll say so. The point, of course,
that you well understand, is that we all can go off the deep end every now
and then, but at least we can poke a little fun at each other. Phil just
seems to make a habit of being wrong and bitching about those that correct
him, and seems to take everything so personally.

Every once in a great while I feel like tweaking his great bit of self
importance. I apologize to you for taking up your time.

Please. Do as I do. Always check your facts before posting nonsense to
the interweb.

Matthew

--
I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one.
Which one do you want?