Calculate your carbon footprint

"Phil Randal" wrote in message
...
Peter Muehlbauer wrote:

Why do you refuse to accept the truth?
AGW is a fake and fraud and Al Gore is the most ridiculous person on
earth.

No he isn't, that title quite clearly belongs to you.

What about Ken Dodd?

Bill

On 2007-07-09, Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
"Phil Randal" wrote

No, they are not facts about the science of climate change. They are
pathetic, nasty, ad-hominem attacks. Which are usually the first resort
of someone who hasn't any evidence to back up their claims.

Yes, yes, ... Mann's hockey stick is nothing better than fire wood.
I think, I don't have to cite anything about Mann, because he was
debunked from tousands of scientists. FACT!

No, that's precisely _when_ you're supposed to cite something. Had
no one debunked him, there would be nothing to cite.

--
David Taylor

"Peter Muehlbauer" wrote in message
...

Al Gore is the most ridiculous person on earth.

see where Al Gore III, after being released from jail on bond was picked up
by his sister driving a 400bhp Maserati Quatroporte?

"altheim" wrote in
:


"Alan" wrote:
altheim wrote

You are trivialising an ongoing event which has had disastrous
consequences for thousands of people unfortunate enough to
live in a floodplain.

I'm not trivialising anything. I'm just pointing out a flood plain
was given that name long before the global warming hype. It seems to
come as some surprise to the media and the residents of such areas
that a flood plain gets flooded?
Surely it is the developers and the government who built over the flood
planes who are the most at fault. I can see that new buyers to that area
would have been told about this as part of the house survey, but renters,
and people who bought houses before stupid ****wits built over the
floodplanes, would not necessarily have known.

Where can you find that info?, I have no idea, but being in West London I
doubt that flooding will become a problem.

Of course it has come as a surprise. For most of those
affected such a flood has never before occurred in their
lifetimes - so rare is such rainfall.


Peter

At 23:44:45 on 04/07/2007, Lord Turkey Cough delighted uk.legal by
announcing:

http://www.bestfootforward.com/carbonlife.htm


Now change the values to give the lowest result possible (by
cheating).

And low and behold we still need 1.2 planets.

Unless you adjust the 'efficiency of economy' dial in which case we get
to 0.6 planets.

JAF wrote in
:


Ever heard of warp land?
Ever heard of fens?
Ever heard of the draining of the fens by the Dutch, in the 17th.
century?

Look it up, then criticise people for where they live.

If you don't know what you're talking about, best keep mum.
Sorry who exactly are you replying to?

"Peter Muehlbauer" wrote:
"altheim" wrote
"Peter Muehlbauer" wrote:
"Pyriform" wrote
Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
If you think the science is false you are an idiot with no
knowledge
of science.

Al Bore is disproved in more than 35 points by hundreds of
scientists.

Cretin. Gore did not invent global warming, nor has he done any of the
research. You may, if you wish, entertain us by listing these 35
points
on
which AGW (presumably) is "disproved".

Anyway, you are able to use Google?
http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=...le-Suche&meta=
Ergebnisse 1 - 10 von ungefähr 45.000 für "Al Gore" disproved

However, for Al Gore+substantiated:
Ergebnisse 1 - 10 von ungefähr 51.100 für "Al Gore" substantiated. (0,18
Sekunden)

http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=altheim+idiot&meta=
Ergebnisse 1 - 10 von ungefähr 1.690 für altheim idiot. (0,53 Sekunden)

Why do you refuse to accept the truth?
AGW is a fake and fraud and Al Gore is the most ridiculous person on
earth.

I don't deny that AGW is controversial and those of us who
accept the reality of it, for now, may one day find it was a
non-event. I just hope, if the reverse proves to be true, that
you will also be big enough to admit you were wrong.
Anyway, it seems the results of your Google search were
not as convincing as you had hoped to show.

--
altheim

In article [email protected], Francis Burton wrote:
In article ,
Dead Paul wrote:
Global warming is due to fluctuations in the Sun. Several planets in the
solar system are now known to be warming also.

Are you saying ALL of global warming is due to solar fluctuation?
Or just some of it? If so, how much?

No answer, eh?

It looks like solar fluctuation might account for very little of
the recent global warming.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6290228.stm
http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media...pa20071880.pdf

"There is considerable evidence for solar influence on the Earth's
pre-industrial climate and the Sun may well have been a factor in
post-industrial climate change in the first half of the last
century. Here we show that over the past 20 years, all the trends
in the Sun that could have had an influence on the Earth's climate
have been in the opposite direction to that required to explain
the observed rise in global mean temperature."

Francis

"Alan" wrote in message
...

When they say that it was the wettest June since 1914 they mean that it
was also rather wet in 1914!


Well with the latest carbon footprint governments adverts say we have a
problem, and they are very similar to the Aids gov infos in the 80s

Remember it was the government that gave us "peace in our time" in 1938,
Mass death by Aids in 1986 and now global warming.

"Bill Wright" wrote in message
...

I wish I could take you to meet
the people of Toll Bar, and let you spout such ****e! You wouldn't last
ten seconds mate!


We should take the views of violent people into account over peaceful
comment?