![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
common_ wrote:
"Matthew L. Martin" wrote: Given that there are already very cheap USB ATSC tuners I think you are full of ****, as usual. excuse me,,but what does USB have to do with this thread? after 2009-02-17 a portable TV w/o an built in ATSC tuner will be useless,,, useless, my aunt's fanny. My PS2 will still work just fine with one. Dave "assuming I ever get around to buying a TV in the FIRST place, that is" DeLaney -- \/David DeLaney posting from "It's not the pot that grows the flower It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeableBLINK http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:03:43 -0700 Steve Curtis wrote:
| " wrote: | |Steve Curtis wrote: | |"JXStern" wrote: | | Think of the portable DVD players |they do have now, but add ATSC |tuner. | |Wonder if we'll ever see a portable |Blu-ray and/or HD-DVD player. | |I'm sure it will eventually happen if any |content comes only in that form. That |remains to be seen. If "they" always |make SD DVD versions of every movie |or other content, then maybe not. | | Right now the closest thing to a portable Blu-ray DVD player is a Sony | VAIO notebook computer with a Blu-ray drive. And that could have uses for that high-capacity media for other than video content. I personally prefer to see BR-DVD become popular just so the blank media for the recordable version becomes cheaper sooner so I can use it for data purposes. But it can also help video content, too, allowing for less compression, more time, or other stuff. -- |---------------------------------------/----------------------------------| | Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below | | first name lower case at ipal.net / | |------------------------------------/-------------------------------------| |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
In alt.tv.tech.hdtv Matthew L. Martin wrote:
| wrote: | On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:06:38 -0700 NadCixelsyd wrote: | | | Target has a couple of tiny LCD tvs, but I think they are just NTSC, | | and are only modest pixels in any case. | | | | Any new TV that has an NTSC tuner MUST also have an ATSC tuner. If | | it's just a monitor, without a NTSC tuner, then an ATSC tuner is not | | required. This requirement has been in effect since March. | | The requirement currently only applies to what is manufactured since | March. Current stocks can be sold down. Eventually portable TVs will | have to have an ATSC tuner, or have no tuner. | | | | The modest pixels LCDs at Walmart (800x600) have an ATSC tuner. It's | | just not HDTV, but it should be a bit better than a NTSC signal. | | But when there is a small portable one, battery powered, easily carryable, | then I will buy (if decent quality). Portable TVs exist. But they are | still just NTSC only. They'll need an STB after 2009-02-17 and an STB on | a portable TV just doesn't seem right. | | | Given that there are already very cheap USB ATSC tuners I think you are | full of ****, as usual. You sure are getting back into the mode you were in when I first encountered your pathetic attitude. I suggest you post a plausible argument that explains how a "very cheap USB ATSC tuner" contradicts the very fact that absolutely every portable TV on store shelves and store web sites have only NTSC tuners. Have you ever though about "supply pipeline"? It is very possible they are already making the ATSC portables. It is very possible they have been making them since March or even before. It is very possible they are just pushing stocks of portable TVs that don't have ATSC so they don't take such a big loss on them. A lot of explanations are possible. But you'd never think of that as long as your net-bully people-hating idiot attitude is engaged. -- |---------------------------------------/----------------------------------| | Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below | | first name lower case at ipal.net / | |------------------------------------/-------------------------------------| |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
In alt.tv.tech.hdtv common_ wrote:
| "Matthew L. Martin" wrote: | wrote: | On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:06:38 -0700 NadCixelsyd wrote: | | | Target has a couple of tiny LCD tvs, but I think they are just NTSC, | | and are only modest pixels in any case. | | | | Any new TV that has an NTSC tuner MUST also have an ATSC tuner. If | | it's just a monitor, without a NTSC tuner, then an ATSC tuner is not | | required. This requirement has been in effect since March. | | The requirement currently only applies to what is manufactured since | March. Current stocks can be sold down. Eventually portable TVs will | have to have an ATSC tuner, or have no tuner. | | | | The modest pixels LCDs at Walmart (800x600) have an ATSC tuner. It's | | just not HDTV, but it should be a bit better than a NTSC signal. | | But when there is a small portable one, battery powered, easily carryable, | then I will buy (if decent quality). Portable TVs exist. But they are | still just NTSC only. They'll need an STB after 2009-02-17 and an STB on | a portable TV just doesn't seem right. | | |Given that there are already very cheap USB ATSC tuners I think you are |full of ****, as usual. | |Matthew | |-- |I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one. |Which one do you want? | | excuse me,,but what does USB have to do with this thread? You nailed it :-) ... it's his "excuse" to make yet another personal attack. That or he somehow thinks a USB ATSC tuner and a laptop computer makes a fine portable TV. I'd like to see a portable TV in an iPhone form factor (as one possible way to make it nicely portable). | after 2009-02-17 a portable TV w/o an built in ATSC tuner will be | useless,,, I think he knows that. But he's probably off his meds right now (maybe Bob took them ... haven't seen many COFDM arguments lately) and doesn't engage the smart part of his brain. -- |---------------------------------------/----------------------------------| | Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below | | first name lower case at ipal.net / | |------------------------------------/-------------------------------------| |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
In alt.tv.tech.hdtv Matthew L. Martin wrote:
| The fact that a STB is not an obstacle to an OTA portable TV. The | technology is already available, it simply needs to be used in a *very* | slightly different way. | | after 2009-02-17 a portable TV w/o an built in ATSC tuner will be | useless,,, | | | Unless it has a USB size STB. Post at least ONE URL to a web page showing the technical details of a small portable TV that has a USB socket for a tuner _with_ slot space to entirely hold that tuner in a way that does not have something sticking out from some side or have dangling wires. I'm not going to even consider looking at USB connected ATSC tuners unless you can show that there is a plausible use for such tuners in a form factor I currently need. USB TV tuners is an intruiging idea for other reasons ... as a means for a computer to provide a full transport stream (video, audio, PSIP, and more than one channel) to a TV. But that's something unrelated to my current need for a portable TV that doesn't become useless on 2009-02-18. -- |---------------------------------------/----------------------------------| | Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below | | first name lower case at ipal.net / | |------------------------------------/-------------------------------------| |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
In alt.tv.tech.hdtv David DeLaney wrote:
| common_ wrote: |"Matthew L. Martin" wrote: |Given that there are already very cheap USB ATSC tuners I think you are |full of ****, as usual. | |excuse me,,but what does USB have to do with this thread? | |after 2009-02-17 a portable TV w/o an built in ATSC tuner will be |useless,,, | | useless, my aunt's fanny. My PS2 will still work just fine with one. Wow, you carry a PS2 with the TV used with it, while playing? :-) Of course an old NTSC TV will still have uses for devices that have RF out using an NTSC (N)otice (T)he (S)can (C)rawl video system. Even better if the TV has video in. Better still if S-video in. Best if component in. Better than best if DVI/HDMI in. But I don't know that people want all that in a portable TV (though I would check it out if they made one like that with an ATSC+NTSC tuner integrated into it). But my expected use for a _small_ portable TV is carrying it around and being able to receive OTA TV. -- |---------------------------------------/----------------------------------| | Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below | | first name lower case at ipal.net / | |------------------------------------/-------------------------------------| |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
(David DeLaney) wrote: common_ wrote: after 2009-02-17 a portable TV w/o an built in ATSC tuner will be useless,,, useless, my aunt's fanny. My PS2 will still work just fine with one. Dave "assuming I ever get around to buying a TV in the FIRST place, that is" DeLaney Also, http://tinyurl.com/s3ap7 . You'd have to modify it a bit to do it with a portable TV, but I'm sure that's well within your capabilities. -- - Doctroid Doctroid Holmes It's too confused to make sense, so let's make nonsense. -- Chris McG. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
In alt.tv.tech.hdtv Matthew L. Martin wrote: | wrote: | On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:06:38 -0700 NadCixelsyd wrote: | | | Target has a couple of tiny LCD tvs, but I think they are just NTSC, | | and are only modest pixels in any case. | | | | Any new TV that has an NTSC tuner MUST also have an ATSC tuner. If | | it's just a monitor, without a NTSC tuner, then an ATSC tuner is not | | required. This requirement has been in effect since March. | | The requirement currently only applies to what is manufactured since | March. Current stocks can be sold down. Eventually portable TVs will | have to have an ATSC tuner, or have no tuner. | | | | The modest pixels LCDs at Walmart (800x600) have an ATSC tuner. It's | | just not HDTV, but it should be a bit better than a NTSC signal. | | But when there is a small portable one, battery powered, easily carryable, | then I will buy (if decent quality). Portable TVs exist. But they are | still just NTSC only. They'll need an STB after 2009-02-17 and an STB on | a portable TV just doesn't seem right. | | | Given that there are already very cheap USB ATSC tuners I think you are | full of ****, as usual. You sure are getting back into the mode you were in when I first encountered your pathetic attitude. You are an ignorant, self centered blow hard. I suggest you post a plausible argument that explains how a "very cheap USB ATSC tuner" contradicts the very fact that absolutely every portable TV on store shelves and store web sites have only NTSC tuners. Who said it had to be anything currently on the market, you ignorant, self centered blow hard. Have you ever though about "supply pipeline"? It is very possible they are already making the ATSC portables. Then just what is your problem, ignorant, self centered blow hard. It is very possible they have been making them since March or even before. It is very possible they are just pushing stocks of portable TVs that don't have ATSC so they don't take such a big loss on them. A lot of explanations are possible. You spend a lot of words on speculation, ignorant, self centered blow hard. But you'd never think of that as long as your net-bully people-hating idiot attitude is engaged. I did, you are the one who brought up the portable with a STB, not me, ignorant, self centered blow hard. I simply pointed out that the technology exists to have an ATSC tuner in a USB sized device. It is possible, though unlikely that they will be manufactured at enough volume to justify the NRE. Matthew -- I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one. Which one do you want? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How big does a Tv have to be to show 1080p native resolution. | Home Theatre Guy | High definition TV | 0 | September 20th 06 06:02 AM |
| 1080 native resolution and scaling | Ben | UK digital tv | 6 | May 18th 06 04:42 PM |
| What is native resolution? | jm | High definition TV | 5 | December 27th 05 09:52 PM |
| Playing the STB at native resolution of the display | Norris Watkins | High definition TV | 0 | April 3rd 04 05:29 PM |
| Playing the STB at native resolution of the display | Norris Watkins | High definition TV | 0 | April 3rd 04 05:29 PM |