![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#281
|
|||
|
|||
|
it would be STUPID to impeach Bush
to begin with LOOK AT THE COST to the taxpayers by the time the impeachemnt case came around you would be within 4 months of Bush leaving office anyhow On Jul 7, 11:11 pm, "Matthew L. Martin" wrote: George Graves wrote: On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 19:03:32 -0700, Sparrow wrote (in article om): Read all about it, hehttp://Muvy.org OK, I'm all for it. What are the charges? Remember, these have to be legitimate charges, instances where he broke US law. That is not what the US Constitution says. It says: the President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors." "high crimes and misdemeanors" means whatever a majority of the House of Representatives says it means (See: impeachment of Bill Clinton). Conviction of said offense is up to a two thirds majority of the Senate. Being unable to secure a simple majority in the Senate in the case of Bill Clinton it is clear that simple perjury is insufficient cause to impeach, much less convict, a sitting president. This is just as well as any prosecutor worth the name can get an indictment of a ham sandwich. A partisan majority in the House may impeach for jaywalking, but the Senate must agree that jaywalking is a "high crime or misdemeanor". Matthew -- I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one. Which one do you want? |
|
#282
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:42:36 -0700, Hertz Dount wrote
(in article ): "George Graves" wrote in message . net... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:34:05 -0700, Lars Träger wrote (in article ) : Hertz Dount wrote: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a vacilator like Billary gaining office. Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly be worse than the last few Republicans. Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the country over to terrorists and illegal aliens. I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your paranoia. I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them are prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in! Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit, and Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what it takes to stand up to the job. So which of the Reps is any better? Most anybody would be better than those two. You think GWB is bad (and he is)? You ain't seen nothing yet! You are right... put the Billary-bot in office, or Obubba who has no politcal, leadership or military experience, and the horror show will go into overdrive.... Honu Well, liberals are pretty simple-minded when it comes to the real world. They figure that if the candidate is not Bush, is a Democrat, a member of a "minority", and has socialist-internationalist leanings, that he/she/it just has to be perfect. They will gladly give up their birthright and abandon their culture in order to march headlong into a socialist, one-world utopia. One wonders if they will still feel that way once they have achieved their goal? I'd bet not, but then it will be too late. |
|
#284
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:34 -0700, John wrote
(in article ) : "Jason McNorton" wrote in message .. . In article , says... Hertz Dount wrote: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a vacilator like Billary gaining office. Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly be worse than the last few Republicans. Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the country over to terrorists and illegal aliens. I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your paranoia. I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them are prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in! Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit, and Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what it takes to stand up to the job. So which of the Reps is any better? Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in 2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in 2008 too. You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans. He may not be deluded to support the Republicans, but he is certainly deluded to project that they could win a Presidential election as hated as Bush & Co. is at this point in time. |
|
#285
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:27:51 -0700, CoffeehouseSchmuck wrote
(in article om): it would be STUPID to impeach Bush to begin with LOOK AT THE COST to the taxpayers by the time the impeachemnt case came around you would be within 4 months of Bush leaving office anyhow Good point. |
|
#286
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... "Jason McNorton" wrote in message .. . In article , says... Hertz Dount wrote: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a vacilator like Billary gaining office. Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly be worse than the last few Republicans. Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the country over to terrorists and illegal aliens. I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your paranoia. I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them are prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in! Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit, and Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what it takes to stand up to the job. So which of the Reps is any better? Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in 2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in 2008 too. You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans. Back at you, but replace 'Republicans' with 'any democrat'. |
|
#287
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , gmgraves2
@comcast.net says... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:34 -0700, John wrote (in article ) : "Jason McNorton" wrote in message .. . In article , says... Hertz Dount wrote: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a vacilator like Billary gaining office. Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly be worse than the last few Republicans. Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the country over to terrorists and illegal aliens. I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your paranoia. I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them are prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in! Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit, and Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what it takes to stand up to the job. So which of the Reps is any better? Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in 2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in 2008 too. You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans. He may not be deluded to support the Republicans, but he is certainly deluded to project that they could win a Presidential election as hated as Bush & Co. is at this point in time. Thankfully there's no election today.. IE, endless things can and will happen between now and the next election. And if hillary or obama is the best they can offer, I'm pretty ok with that. |
|
#288
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John" wrote in message ... "Jason McNorton" wrote in message .. . In article , says... Hertz Dount wrote: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a vacilator like Billary gaining office. Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly be worse than the last few Republicans. Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the country over to terrorists and illegal aliens. I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your paranoia. I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them are prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in! Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit, and Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what it takes to stand up to the job. So which of the Reps is any better? Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in 2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in 2008 too. You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans. No, it would be insane to support the "cut and run" democrats, who would be weak and cowardly in the face of terrorism. Honu |
|
#289
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Graves" wrote in message . net... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:34 -0700, John wrote (in article ) : "Jason McNorton" wrote in message .. . In article , says... Hertz Dount wrote: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a vacilator like Billary gaining office. Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly be worse than the last few Republicans. Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the country over to terrorists and illegal aliens. I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your paranoia. I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them are prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in! Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit, and Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what it takes to stand up to the job. So which of the Reps is any better? Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in 2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in 2008 too. You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans. He may not be deluded to support the Republicans, but he is certainly deluded to project that they could win a Presidential election as hated as Bush & Co. is at this point in time. There are still people who can see that the democrats have no candidate of any rela value to offer. Many don't wish to give in to the terrorists the way the dems and libs do. Many still love this country enough to not to want to sell it out. And there are folks smart enough so see that the Billary-bot is nothing buch a chimera to put her husband back in power. Honu |
|
#290
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jason McNorton" wrote in message . .. In article , gmgraves2 @comcast.net says... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:34 -0700, John wrote (in article ) : "Jason McNorton" wrote in message .. . In article , says... Hertz Dount wrote: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a vacilator like Billary gaining office. Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly be worse than the last few Republicans. Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the country over to terrorists and illegal aliens. I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your paranoia. I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them are prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in! Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit, and Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what it takes to stand up to the job. So which of the Reps is any better? Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in 2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in 2008 too. You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans. He may not be deluded to support the Republicans, but he is certainly deluded to project that they could win a Presidential election as hated as Bush & Co. is at this point in time. Thankfully there's no election today.. IE, endless things can and will happen between now and the next election. And if hillary or obama is the best they can offer, I'm pretty ok with that. After they sell out the country, will you still be "okay with that"? Honu |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Canadian TV broadcast networks propose tax on OTA services; Americans take note | Taylor | Satellite dbs | 21 | November 29th 06 03:06 PM |
| Bush ws6680 | Mikky | UK home cinema | 0 | November 3rd 04 07:42 AM |
| Americans | Emit Remmus | High definition TV | 0 | May 13th 04 06:27 PM |
| Sky code for Bush TV | Gary Rose | UK sky | 3 | May 11th 04 12:58 AM |