Calculate your carbon footprint

"Phil Randal" wrote
Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
"Bill Wright" wrote
"Rich" wrote in message
. ..
Hey, I'm sure that there are some exciting moments in Al Gore's life,
although my
imagination is lacking in regards to what those might be.
He's political failure who looked round for a bandwagon, saw a good one, and
jumped on. He is becoming very famous and turning into an international
superstar on the back of the global warming fiasco. Yet his own personal
consumption is megga!

Shorter version:
He hasn't digested the rout in 2000 and that's dishonour for him.
What we see here is a dispaired try to regain his honesty by hook
or by crook. IOW, it's simply compensation of an inferiority complex.
He needs the masses to approve him, regardless of if he is right or wrong.
The false science he uses is nothing more than a medium for him to
achieve his goal. This guy is simply a case for psychiatry.

False science? Strange, the climatologists who run realclimate.org said
his film was mostly sound. I'll trust them more than I trust you on that.

You mean that realkooks.org?
The one, where liars and bribed "scientists" incense themselves?

Contributors:
Mann = well known imposter and liar.
Rahmstorf = religious-fanatical idiot, bribed with US$1.000.000 by an african commerce group.

LOL
realclimate.org is the very last website, I would recommend.

"Bill Wright" wrote

"Peter Muehlbauer" wrote in message
...

"Bill Wright" wrote

"Rich" wrote in message
. ..
Hey, I'm sure that there are some exciting moments in Al Gore's life,
although my
imagination is lacking in regards to what those might be.

He's political failure who looked round for a bandwagon, saw a good one,
and
jumped on. He is becoming very famous and turning into an international
superstar on the back of the global warming fiasco. Yet his own personal
consumption is megga!

Shorter version:
He hasn't digested the rout in 2000 and that's dishonour for him.
What we see here is a dispaired try to regain his honesty by hook
or by crook. IOW, it's simply compensation of an inferiority complex.
He needs the masses to approve him, regardless of if he is right or wrong.
The false science he uses is nothing more than a medium for him to
achieve his goal. This guy is simply a case for psychiatry.

But it was longer . . .

Ok, 100% consensus, I see :-)

"Pyriform" wrote
Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
"Bill Wright" wrote

"Rich" wrote in message
. ..
Hey, I'm sure that there are some exciting moments in Al Gore's
life, although my
imagination is lacking in regards to what those might be.

He's political failure who looked round for a bandwagon, saw a good
one, and jumped on. He is becoming very famous and turning into an
international superstar on the back of the global warming fiasco.
Yet his own personal consumption is megga!

Shorter version:
He hasn't digested the rout in 2000 and that's dishonour for him.

If you think it was a "rout", you are an idiot with no knowledge of recent
history.

You can call it like you want. He hasn't won, that's fact.

What we see here is a dispaired try to regain his honesty by hook
or by crook. IOW, it's simply compensation of an inferiority complex.
He needs the masses to approve him, regardless of if he is right or
wrong. The false science he uses is nothing more than a medium for
him to achieve his goal. This guy is simply a case for psychiatry.

If you think the science is false you are an idiot with no knowledge of
science.

Al Bore is disproved in more than 35 points by hundreds of scientists.
"If CO2 increases, the temperature will increase too." is only one of
his idiotic statements. Even IPCC does not admit it.
So not I'm the idiot, but those who hang on Al Bore's lips and believe
everything without a second thought.

In article , Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
I don't know the regional conditions or some thing about the Coal Board,
but I saw an analogy to New Orleans, where, despite of all warnings,
people rebuild their houses at the same places again, always aware that
such a catastrophe could happen again. And that I simply call unreasonableness.

I'd call it unafordableness.

They say the total damage cost is about 1.5 billion, and the government has
offered 14 million - that's just under one percent of the cost of repairing the
property that people who couldn't afford insurance already had. Most of them now
appear to be without a pot to **** in, so they are unlikely ever to be able to
buy new homes anywhere, never mind choosing where they want to buy them.

Rod.

"Roderick Stewart" wrote
In article , Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
I don't know the regional conditions or some thing about the Coal Board,
but I saw an analogy to New Orleans, where, despite of all warnings,
people rebuild their houses at the same places again, always aware that
such a catastrophe could happen again. And that I simply call unreasonableness.

I'd call it unafordableness.

They say the total damage cost is about 1.5 billion, and the government has
offered 14 million - that's just under one percent of the cost of repairing the
property that people who couldn't afford insurance already had. Most of them now
appear to be without a pot to **** in, so they are unlikely ever to be able to
buy new homes anywhere, never mind choosing where they want to buy them.

If they put up with 14 million then they are dumb, sorry.
That's a problem of the government to support them not only with a nail
to fix the postbox.
Anyway, if I would be in this position, I would prefer to live in a tent 100 miles
inland, instead of rebuilding my house in such a dangerous region.

Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
realclimate.org is the very last website, I would recommend.

Yes, but that's because you are a clueless ****wit. That fact alone should
serve as a ringing endorsement of the site for everyone else.

Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
If you think the science is false you are an idiot with no knowledge
of science.

Al Bore is disproved in more than 35 points by hundreds of scientists.

Cretin. Gore did not invent global warming, nor has he done any of the
research. You may, if you wish, entertain us by listing these 35 points on
which AGW (presumably) is "disproved".

"If CO2 increases, the temperature will increase too." is only one of
his idiotic statements. Even IPCC does not admit it.

CO2 is a greenhouse gas, moron. *Of course* the IPCC attributes global
temperature rise to increased atmospheric CO2 levels.

So not I'm the idiot,

No, you really are. You are just too stupid to appreciate the depth of your
ignorance.

On Jul 8, 6:36 pm, "Pyriform" wrote:

retarded sockpuppet

"Pyriform" wrote
Peter Muehlbauer wrote:
If you think the science is false you are an idiot with no knowledge
of science.

Al Bore is disproved in more than 35 points by hundreds of scientists.

Cretin. Gore did not invent global warming, nor has he done any of the
research. You may, if you wish, entertain us by listing these 35 points on
which AGW (presumably) is "disproved".

Anyway, you are able to use Google?
http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=...le-Suche&meta=
Ergebnisse 1 - 10 von ungefähr 45.000 für "Al Gore" disproved

But maybe you will start with this
http://home.earthlink.net/~ponderthemaunderg/


"If CO2 increases, the temperature will increase too." is only one of
his idiotic statements. Even IPCC does not admit it.

CO2 is a greenhouse gas, moron. *Of course* the IPCC attributes global
temperature rise to increased atmospheric CO2 levels.

Heard something about CO2 lag before? No?
Al Gore said, CO2 causes temperature, and that is definitely wrong.

So not I'm the idiot,

No, you really are. You are just too stupid to appreciate the depth of your
ignorance.

Nice to see you speaking of ignorance, kook.

Alan wrote:

It doesn't change the fact that it only a localised bit of flooding that
the news media have blown out of all proportion to reality.

All flooding's local to the area it floods. Don't be such a dickhead.