![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Huge collection of tattoos, find your favorite tattoos in this tattoos
gallery, many models of tattoos are shown here. You can find any models of tattoos here. http://tattoohouse.blogspot.com/ |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pastaka" wrote in message oups.com... Huge collection of tattoos This reminded me of a "fact" that was passed around when I was in elementary school (mid to late '50s). It stated that one would most certainly get "lead" poisoning from pencils if used to make tattoos. This was in the "just rewards"/precautionary tale format when told. The victim (always a child about our age at the time) give himself (or was given by a peer) a tattoo using a pencil. The "lead" in the pencil gave him lead poisoning and his arm had to be amputated. I'd heard this both in the civilian grade school 2nd-5th grades) I went to in Aurora, CO and the military dependants school (6th grade) I went to at Minot AFB, ND. By the time I heard it at the latter school, I had already found out that "lead" was actually graphite and harmless, which I was more than happy to inform the teller of the tale. Which, I guess, initiated my interest in debunking (as well as my social ostrazation). That pencil lead (actually, a non-toxic, blend of graphite and clay) could cause lead poisoning is not too uncommon a misconception, as observed by the many sites disclaiming it. But so far I haven't seen any other recounts of an imaginary incident behind it. But I remember it being taken as gospel at the time. -- -Don Ever had one of those days where you just felt like: http://cosmoslair.com/BadDay.html ? (Eating the elephant outside the box, one paradigm at a time) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Don Freeman" wrote in message ... "Pastaka" wrote in message oups.com... Huge collection of tattoos This reminded me of a "fact" that was passed around when I was in elementary school (mid to late '50s). It stated that one would most certainly get "lead" poisoning from pencils if used to make tattoos. This was in the "just rewards"/precautionary tale format when told. The victim (always a child about our age at the time) give himself (or was given by a peer) a tattoo using a pencil. The "lead" in the pencil gave him lead poisoning and his arm had to be amputated. I'd heard this both in the civilian grade school 2nd-5th grades) I went to in Aurora, CO and the military dependants school (6th grade) I went to at Minot AFB, ND. By the time I heard it at the latter school, I had already found out that "lead" was actually graphite and harmless, which I was more than happy to inform the teller of the tale. Which, I guess, initiated my interest in debunking (as well as my social ostrazation). That pencil lead (actually, a non-toxic, blend of graphite and clay) could cause lead poisoning is not too uncommon a misconception, as observed by the many sites disclaiming it. But so far I haven't seen any other recounts of an imaginary incident behind it. But I remember it being taken as gospel at the time. back in the day, wasn't the graphite actually lead? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"longshot" wrote in message
news:[email protected] back in the day, wasn't the graphite actually lead? No, it was thought, during the early pencil days (1500's), that graphite was a form of lead, hence the misnomer. Yet, nearly 500 years later, we still call them "lead" pencils and number their hardness. -- Matt Barrow (Who did a lot of mechanical drawing with a 2H lead pencil in the days before CAD) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"longshot" wrote in message news:[email protected] "Don Freeman" wrote in message ... That pencil lead (actually, a non-toxic, blend of graphite and clay) could cause lead poisoning is not too uncommon a misconception, as observed by the many sites disclaiming it. But so far I haven't seen any other recounts of an imaginary incident behind it. But I remember it being taken as gospel at the time. back in the day, wasn't the graphite actually lead? From http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s1195234.htm : "About 2,000 years ago, the Greeks and the Romans realized that a sharpened lump of lead would mark papyrus with a dry light line. A dry line is good, but light is hard to see." I may be old but when I said mid to late fifties, I was referring to 1950 AD. Not 50 AD. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:10:16 -0700, "Don Freeman"
wrote: back in the day, wasn't the graphite actually lead? From http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s1195234.htm : "About 2,000 years ago, the Greeks and the Romans realized that a sharpened lump of lead would mark papyrus with a dry light line. A dry line is good, but light is hard to see." I may be old but when I said mid to late fifties, I was referring to 1950 AD. Not 50 AD. Heh. Well, IIRC, by about third grade in the early 1960s timeframe, we knew better. J. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TATTOO DESIGNS | [email protected] | High definition TV | 0 | June 24th 07 06:47 PM |
| FS:**LOTR:Return of The King, Tattoo (DTS. Germany) + loads more** | APPRIA40WR | UK home cinema | 0 | May 26th 04 12:38 PM |
| FS:**LOTR:Return of The King, Tattoo (DTS. Germany) + loads more** | APPRIA40WR | UK home cinema | 0 | May 26th 04 12:38 PM |