The whole of Sheiffield under water.

Well you would think so the way the news channels are
going overvboard about it.
Blimey you would think these people had never seen a heavy
rain shower before!!
A waste of the license payers money.

It is summer, their's no other news, why do you think they put Big brother
on at this time of year!
:-p
"Lord Turkey Cough" wrote in message
...
Well you would think so the way the news channels are
going overvboard about it.
Blimey you would think these people had never seen a heavy
rain shower before!!
A waste of the license payers money.

In article ,
says...
Well you would think so the way the news channels are
going overvboard about it.
Blimey you would think these people had never seen a heavy
rain shower before!!
A waste of the license payers money.

Some poor bloke drowning in front of a bunch of helpless firefighters
because he had his foot trapped in a gate is pretty serious stuff.
Isn;t it?
--
SAm.

Sam Nelson wrote:
In article ,
says...
Well you would think so the way the news channels are
going overvboard about it.
Blimey you would think these people had never seen a heavy
rain shower before!!
A waste of the license payers money.

Some poor bloke drowning in front of a bunch of helpless firefighters
because he had his foot trapped in a gate is pretty serious stuff.
Isn;t it?

Something's funny there. They must've had access to Fire Service & Police
Diver breathing apparatus (which would've kept him alive for a hour or so
underwater), and they were surely carrying cutting equipment (which would've
dealt with the trapped foot, by amputation in the last resort). Even
without the technology, if they'd strapped a harness under him and then set
6 beefy firemen pulling hard he would've come free eventually (perhaps with
a broken, torn or even missing foot).

Will be interesting to hear the full story when it emerges.

"Sam Nelson" wrote in message
t...
In article ,
says...
Well you would think so the way the news channels are
going overvboard about it.
Blimey you would think these people had never seen a heavy
rain shower before!!
A waste of the license payers money.

Some poor bloke drowning in front of a bunch of helpless firefighters
because he had his foot trapped in a gate is pretty serious stuff.
Isn;t it?

Not much coverage of that unfortunately.
The man coverage is of a very people surrounded by
a foot or so of water for a few hours.
Don't they have any wellingtons?


--
SAm.

"Sam Nelson" wrote in message
t...
In article ,
says...
Well you would think so the way the news channels are
going overvboard about it.
Blimey you would think these people had never seen a heavy
rain shower before!!
A waste of the license payers money.

Some poor bloke drowning in front of a bunch of helpless firefighters
because he had his foot trapped in a gate is pretty serious stuff.
Isn;t it?


Not much coverage of that unfortunately.
The main coverage is of a few people surrounded by
a foot or so of water for a few hours.
Don't they have any wellingtons?





--
SAm.

"Lord Turkey Cough" wrote in message
...

"Sam Nelson" wrote in message
t...
In article ,
says...
Well you would think so the way the news channels are
going overvboard about it.
Blimey you would think these people had never seen a heavy
rain shower before!!
A waste of the license payers money.

Some poor bloke drowning in front of a bunch of helpless firefighters
because he had his foot trapped in a gate is pretty serious stuff.
Isn;t it?

Not much coverage of that unfortunately.
The man coverage is of a very people surrounded by
a foot or so of water for a few hours.
Don't they have any wellingtons?

Ignore this, post I put a new one in.



--
SAm.

On 25/06/2007 21:33, Lord Turkey Cough wrote:

Ignore this, post I put a new one in.

For the sake of a missing "i"? You could cancel the original message if
you though people cared, or that most people hadn't killfile'd you.

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:54:40 +0100, Andy Burns
wrote:

On 25/06/2007 21:33, Lord Turkey Cough wrote:

Ignore this, post I put a new one in.

For the sake of a missing "i"? You could cancel the original message if
you though people cared, or that most people hadn't killfile'd you.

What's the apostrophy for ?

DG

"Derek Geldard" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:54:40 +0100, Andy Burns
wrote:

On 25/06/2007 21:33, Lord Turkey Cough wrote:

Ignore this, post I put a new one in.

For the sake of a missing "i"? You could cancel the original message if
you though people cared, or that most people hadn't killfile'd you.

What's the apostrophy for ?

Its to indicate something is missing.


DG