Moon proves the green house effect is b*llocks

Irish Mike wrote:
I think the whole "global warming" hysteria is a crock of ****.

And I think you are an idiot. The difference between us is that I have the
evidence (your post) and you do not.

"Pyriform" wrote in message
news
Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
"*likely* to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas"

In other words they have no evidence whatsoever to prove it.

There is no such thing as proof in any empirical science, dimbulb. That is
found only in mathematics, and not always there, either. So in science,
all we can ever have is supporting evidence. I believe the "likely" quote
was from the IPCC third assessment. In the fourth assessment, that is
strengthened to "very likely", meaning that the level of confidence is
between 90 and 95%. That means it is time to act.

I right then I won't leave my electrical goods on standby, just like
Lewis Hamilton does.

On Jun 14, 1:25 pm, "Pyriform" wrote:
Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
"*likely* to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas"

In other words they have no evidence whatsoever to prove it.

There is no such thing as proof in any empirical science, dimbulb. That is
found only in mathematics, and not always there, either. So in science, all
we can ever have is supporting evidence. I believe the "likely" quote was
from the IPCC third assessment. In the fourth assessment, that is
strengthened to "very likely", meaning that the level of confidence is
between 90 and 95%. That means it is time to act.

Correct. The IPCC's paper "Working Group I Report (WGI): Climate
Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis" published March 2007 states:

"Warming of the climate system is unequivocal."

"Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since
the mid-20th century is *very likely* due to the observed increase in
anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations."

In the 2007 report, "very likely" has a specific meaning: a
probability greater than 90%. Merely "likely" would have meant a
probability greater than 66%. An explanation can be found at

http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/...idanceNote.pdf

I think the whole "global warming" hysteria is a crock of ****.

I listened to a recent radio show
interviewing a group of scientists who pretty much said the whole CO2 scare
is bull ****.

Why do you bother posting this **** all the time? Do you think anyone
is listening to you except for perhaps your fellow RGP idiots? Your
bias is transparent and you cherry pick your "sources" based only on
your personal political leanings, bigotry etc.

You're such a simple minded fool you're incapable of being honest even
with yourself.

Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message
...
Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
Guess what the temperature on the moon is (same distance
from the Sun as Earth. Very cold you will wisely say because it
has no atmosphere to keep it warm llike the earth with it's
lovely greehouse gases.
So you would expet it to be about -30C would you not?
Guess what it can get to over 100C there.


PROOF THE GREENHOUSE GAS (CO2) THEORY IS WRONG.

A MYTH EXPOSED BY LORD TURKEY HIMSELF AND

HIS MASSIVE BRAIN.
Troll.


Hey say something,

To even bother to address myself to what you laughably think is an 'argument'
would be to lend credibility to a fool.

"Another Problem Solved By R.G.P." wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 14, 1:25 pm, "Pyriform" wrote:
Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
"*likely* to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas"

In other words they have no evidence whatsoever to prove it.

There is no such thing as proof in any empirical science, dimbulb. That
is
found only in mathematics, and not always there, either. So in science,
all
we can ever have is supporting evidence. I believe the "likely" quote was
from the IPCC third assessment. In the fourth assessment, that is
strengthened to "very likely", meaning that the level of confidence is
between 90 and 95%. That means it is time to act.

Correct. The IPCC's paper "Working Group I Report (WGI): Climate
Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis" published March 2007 states:

"Warming of the climate system is unequivocal."

"Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since
the mid-20th century is *very likely* due to the observed increase in
anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations."

In the 2007 report, "very likely" has a specific meaning: a
probability greater than 90%. Merely "likely" would have meant a
probability greater than 66%. An explanation can be found at

http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/...idanceNote.pdf

In other words they are just guessing.
These are the same scientists that are saying one thing is good for you one
minute
and bad for you the next. The same scientists who gave super human
properties
to spinach (Popeye) due to a typing error in a table.

The models they have are pretty much useless. They can't even predict the
weather
24 hours in advance. "90% chance of rain" and its the sunniest day ever.
"Definitely no hurricane on the way", and half of England is devestate by
hurricane
force winds (despite being told there was one on the way).
You believe these fools? Why?
They will produce whatever kind of crap which will keep them in a job.
That's all.

"Scott" wrote in message
...
Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message
...
Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
Guess what the temperature on the moon is (same distance
from the Sun as Earth. Very cold you will wisely say because it
has no atmosphere to keep it warm llike the earth with it's
lovely greehouse gases.
So you would expet it to be about -30C would you not?
Guess what it can get to over 100C there.


PROOF THE GREENHOUSE GAS (CO2) THEORY IS WRONG.

A MYTH EXPOSED BY LORD TURKEY HIMSELF AND

HIS MASSIVE BRAIN.
Troll.


Hey say something,

To even bother to address myself to what you laughably think is an
'argument' would be to lend credibility to a fool.

You have no credibility so you are in no position to be lending it in the
first place.
A begger would have more chance of setting himself up as a major merchant
bank.

Lord Turkey Cough wrote:

"Scott" wrote in message
To even bother to address myself to what you laughably think is an
'argument' would be to lend credibility to a fool.

You have no credibility so you are in no position to be lending it in the
first place.

Poor half_wit. So mentally scarred by the abuse that you brought upon
yourself with your social crassness during the years that formed your
personality.

In article , ess
says...
In article ,
says...
Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
"Doh" wrote in message
...
Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
Guess what the temperature on the moon is (same distance
from the Sun as Earth. Very cold you will wisely say because it
has no atmosphere to keep it warm llike the earth with it's
lovely greehouse gases.
So you would expet it to be about -30C would you not?
Guess what it can get to over 100C there.
What temperature is it on the dark side?

The same as the dark side of the earth if it did not rotate so fast!!

Ah-ha - proved your ignorance - there is no dark side of the moon!


Matter of fact, it's all dark...

/ruins the end effect of the album by using his own heartbeat, complete with
clicking aortic valve
--

Dom Robinson Gamertag: DVDfever email: dom at dvdfever dot co dot uk
/* http://DVDfever.co.uk (editor)
/* 1132 DVDs, 347 games, 314 CDs, 110 cinema films, 42 concerts, videos & news
/* antibodies, steve hillage, burning crusade, sega psp, norah jones, kylie
New music charts - http://dvdfever.co.uk/music.shtml
Youtube - http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=DVDfeverDom

Lord Turkey Cough wrote:
Err.......We are talkng about the surface tremperature
You can measure it with a themometer (heat meter)

Heat is not the same as temperature, idiot boy.

BugBear