Clarkson censured for 'bit gay' car gibe

"marc_CH" wrote in message
...
Agamemnon wrote:

Add 'never having been to a pantomime' to the list of things you
pontificate on without knowledge.

Are you telling me that you have seen productions of Puss In Boots and
Dick Whittington where the cats mate with humans?

Dunno. Maybe he has. You seem to have seen an episiode of DW where cats
**** humans. Seems to be something of a recurring theme with you. You ever
get a stiffy when you walk down the petfood aisle in Tesco?


Only when I see a nice looking woman, of the human kind. Jealous lesbian
girl.

On 28 May, 18:56, "Agamemnon" wrote:
"marc_CH" wrote in message


Dunno. Maybe he has. You seem to have seen an episiode of DW where cats
**** humans. Seems to be something of a recurring theme with you. You ever
get a stiffy when you walk down the petfood aisle in Tesco?

Only when I see a nice looking woman, of the human kind. Jealous lesbian
girl.

You ever taken your cats up that aisle?

On 28 May, 18:56, "Agamemnon" wrote:
"marc_CH" wrote in message
You ever
get a stiffy when you walk down the petfood aisle in Tesco?

Only when I see a nice looking woman, of the human kind.

Are there any women other than "the human kind"?

On Mon, 28 May 2007 18:52:47 +0100, "Agamemnon"
wrote:


"marc_CH" wrote in message
...
Greek Freak Agamemnon wrote:

It's hoisted in the past tense like in "the marines hoisted the red
ensign".
Oh but expect you thing the ensign they were hoisting was a junior
cadet.

Wrong
http://alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxhoistw.html

"Hoist" was in Shakespeare's
time the past participles of a verb "to hoise", which meant what "to
hoist" does now: to lift. A petard (see under "peter out" for the
etymology) was an explosive charge detonated by a slowly burning
fuse. "

However I'd love to see you try to 'thing' an ensign.

IDIOT. You are aware of how the past participle is used to make the
future perfect tense aren't you? ie. Going to have done something. The
above statement does not contradict what I have said at all.

Look, there is an easier way to deal with this. It's called 'we are right
and you are wrong'. You can't spell, cannot puctuate, have only a loose
concept of grammar and clearly are using English as a second (or worse)
language. You're in no position to lecture anyone on it, cat****er.


You are an idiot. But what else should I expect from a wonton lesbian


I think if you consult a dictionary you'll find that it's 'wanton'.
Wasn't Wonton a dog? Still have it your own way. I expect we'll soon
be consulting the YED (Yagamemnon Esperanto Dictionary).

Found this under Wonton in the free online dictionary
"A noodle-dough dumpling filled typically with spiced minced pork or
other ground meat, usually boiled in soup or fried and eaten as a side
dish."

= IF

In article ,
marc_CH wrote:
Here you go you ignorant kolofiliac.

Even assuming that 'kolofiliac' is a real word for just a second, just
what makes you think that Dave is one simply because he disagrees with
you?

You seem to take earnest delight in calling me a lesbian, a whore and
suggesting that I ought to be repeatedly raped over a 48 hour period. I
can almost understand that because I can sense the intense female
rejection you have suffered throughout your entire miserable and feeble
life has almost certainly caused you to store up such a formidable
battery of sexual neuroses that you'd make a great MSc Project for some
psychology student. But exactly what has Dave done to suggest to you
that he has anything to do with anal sex, other than disagreeing with
you?

I'm perfectly happy to be insulted in any way by Aggy. The shiftless worm.
What did Healey say? 'like being ravished by a dead sheep'.

--
*Never test the depth of the water with both feet.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article ,
Agamemnon wrote:
But what else should I expect from a wonton lesbian

Being able to use a spell checker? Or are you referring to one without
highlights in her hair?

--
*Out of my mind. Back in five minutes.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Agamemnon wrote:

Who is it that introduced sex into Doctor Who?

You.

kissing, I mean buggering other people of the same gender up the anus or
screwing anything with a hole?

Yup, absolutely you. None of us have seen these episodes.

You do know that this is a programme
watched by children don't you

If so, then that would seem to be a failing of the parents.

and that these Children also watch
Torchwood to follow the adventures of Captain Jack. Why is it that every
lead character in Torchwood is Queer?

They're not. Some are, but not all. You lack attention to detail.

Why is it that there have been
over a dozen gay references in Doctor Who over the past 3 seasons so
far.

Because you are looking for them so hard so as to further your personal
obsession's that you keep finding them?

were prevented from holding positions of influences in the past. It was
to stop them doing what they are doing today perverting our youth.

Do you suppose, had you have watched these programs as a child, you
would now be gay?

Therefore following logic that you have demonstrated that you accept,
you thinking the cat wanted you to **** it means that you were
thinking about ****ing the cat.

POPPYCOCK.

PUPPYCOCK more like. We know your sort.

I know about cat behaviour because I have watched wildlife
documentaries.

Na, that's just a subversive agenda promoted by immoral gay animal
liberation activists. You must have been watching these from too early
and age, and are obviously now hopelessly corrupted.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

marc_CH wrote:

that he has anything to do with anal sex, other than disagreeing with you?

Ah, well, should be obvious. Disagreeing with aggy makes you a deviant
by proxy.

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

Agamemnon wrote:

Look, there is an easier way to deal with this. It's called 'we are
right and you are wrong'. You can't spell, cannot puctuate, have only
a loose concept of grammar and clearly are using English as a second
(or worse) language. You're in no position to lecture anyone on it,
cat****er.


You are an idiot. But what else should I expect from a wonton lesbian

Wanton.

W-A-N-T-O-N.

Wanton.

QED.

Again.

--
marc

"Animals do give their consent to humans to **** them, but only someone
who is mentally deranged or a pervert or both would take up the offer.
-- Aggy"

Agamemnon wrote:

Dunno. Maybe he has. You seem to have seen an episiode of DW where
cats **** humans. Seems to be something of a recurring theme with you.
You ever get a stiffy when you walk down the petfood aisle in Tesco?

Only when I see a nice looking woman, of the human kind. Jealous lesbian
girl.

If I were actually a lesbian then why would I be jealous?

It seems you have learned everything you know about women from the pages
of the wank mags that have filled your solitary existence. In which
case I refer you to

http://www.vidmax.com/index.php/videos/view/1822

which you will probably recognise as being a major part of your life.

--
marc

"Animals do give their consent to humans to **** them, but only someone
who is mentally deranged or a pervert or both would take up the offer.
-- Aggy"