![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#551
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 27 May, 11:29, "Agamemnon" wrote:
Show me a picture of you in a sexy pose and I will find you 10 clients as you asked. I fully expect that you will be utterly incapable of doing so, which ought to surprise no one much. Picture first, clients later. Stop asking her to send you sexy photos of herself you weirdo. It's sexual harassment. |
|
#552
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 27 May, 11:44, "Agamemnon" wrote:
No it was the cat that lifted its tail up and pointed its arse at my face. It is a signal to a male cat to mate with it. I know that because it it did the same thing with its boy friend in my back garden. FFS! You're on about it AGAIN! Weirdo cat voyeur! |
|
#553
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Agamemnon" wrote in message ... snip If Shakespeare can coin the word accommodation then I can coin the word idiogenogamosis. One small problem. Shakespeare was, and still is, a well respected playwrite. You are the laughing stock of two internet newsgroups. Cameron -- "I always had Beevers on my mind." - Gary Russell http://members.fortunecity.com/masomika/ http://members.fortunecity.com/jpcovers/ |
|
#554
|
|||
|
|||
|
"zarbiface" wrote in message oups.com... On 27 May, 11:29, "Agamemnon" wrote: Show me a picture of you in a sexy pose and I will find you 10 clients as you asked. I fully expect that you will be utterly incapable of doing so, which ought to surprise no one much. Picture first, clients later. Stop asking her to send you sexy photos of herself you weirdo. It's sexual harassment. Its not sexual harassment when she's out on the game. |
|
#555
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Stephen Wilson wrote: "The Doctor" wrote in message ... In article , ThePunisher wrote: Stephen Wilson wrote: Hardcore aetheists can be just as irrational as hardcore Christians. How many people have be persecuted or killed by hardcore aetheists? Many under Nazi and Communist Rule. You do realise that the great leader of the Nazis was Christian, don't you? NO way he was!! A Christian does NOT call for the extermination of Jews! -- Member - Liberal International This is Ici God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! PEI!! On 28 May Get rid of the extremists and VOTE LIBERAL! |
|
#556
|
|||
|
|||
|
L. Ross Raszewski wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2007 00:29:20 +0100, Bill Wright wrote: Take away someone's religion and part of their world crumbles. Of course. I respect the psychological help that religion gives its adherents. A belief system that supports people through difficult times has a lot to commend it, even though it might be based on a series of fallacies. I'm excluding from this lunatic fringe amongst the religious, of course. It's important than we don't condemn all religion just because (a) there isn't a god and (b) there is a lunatic fringe. There are large numbers of ordinary people who gain great comfort and strength from their beliefs. I for one would never attempt to take that away from them. After all, they'll never find out that there isn't a god will they, so they won't suffer any disillusionment. What I find most curious about hardcore athiests is the almost religious devotion they have to the notion that "god does not exist". Not "God probably doesn't exist", or "There is not sufficient evidence to reasonably conclude that god exists," but "God absolutely does not exist." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot An atheist sees a superstitious god in much the same way, sure it could be true but logic and evidence it seems bloody unlikely. Too unlikely for me to be called agnostic. I often get the feeling that vocal atheists are just as religious -- or even more -- than hardcore religious nutjobs, it's just that the god they worship is the absence-of-god. You'd most probably be wrong. Can you give an example of the worship of the absence of a god. God may or may not exist. As it happens, I believe he does, and you don't. Some people think that their beliefe makes them right -- as you seem to. As it happens, I don't think that. It seems to me to be very strange that I so rarely meet a vocal athiest who is even willing to consider the possibility that he is wrong, but I often meet people of religious faith who are willing to consider the possibility. Do you believe in your god based on something other than what you have been told by others, often your elders? It rather bothers me that such a large percentage of atheists manifest the specific trait I like least about many of my fellow persons of faith. |
|
#557
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beeblebear wrote:
"Geoff Winkless" ] wrote in message . .. L. Ross Raszewski wrote: Science certainly could be used that way -- science fiction is full of science-horror stories where the scientific elite use science as a tool of oppression. The difference is that scientists won't be able to tell you "we have a right to drug you, abuse you and put you to work in the fields because our Science says so", so any scientist suggesting such a thing gets pretty short shrift from the general public. So yes, while science is theoretically capable of being used evilly you need to have a pretty good grasp on power to start with. What's the quote? "Evil people will always do evil things to good people, and good people will occasionally do evil things to evil people, but for good people to do evil things to good people takes religion"? Um, forst find someone who is pure good or pure evil. You can't. We are not made that way. We have urges to do right sometimes, and we have urges to do wrong sometimes. Second, the quote you use dismisses the existence of patriotism, animal rights movements, and generic other isms. If you really haven't thought through and beyond that sentence, you need to. Fair point there are other isms that drive people to commit abhorrent acts, it does not excuse religion though. |
|
#558
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agamemnon wrote:
Oh really. So you have had the opp then. You need a lobotomy. You need an enema. Male arses again, I note. -- marc "Animals do give their consent to humans to **** them, but only someone who is mentally deranged or a pervert or both would take up the offer. -- Aggy" |
|
#559
|
|||
|
|||
|
Greek Freak Agamemnon wrote:
Have you ever stopped think what you sound like to everyone else? You are obsessed with homosexual male intercourse, No. I am against it. So why do you post about almost nothing *except* homosexuality? watch bestiality videos, No different to watching Gridlock then. Can't say I noticed any hardcore man-on-beast action there. Maybe your version did. think the neighbour's cat wants you to **** it and then lift the poor Learn some basic animal psychology. What, that cats want to **** us all? creature's tail up and point its arse at your own face. No it was the cat that lifted its tail up and pointed its arse at my face. It is a signal to a male cat to mate with it. I know that because it it did the same thing with its boy friend in my back garden. That is absolutely not what you said and you know it. Oh no. Hang on. That was Bill gates' fault, wasn't it? Greek Freak indeed. -- marc "Animals do give their consent to humans to **** them, but only someone who is mentally deranged or a pervert or both would take up the offer. -- Aggy" |
|
#560
|
|||
|
|||
|
L. Ross Raszewski wrote:
In fact, most of the time, if I asked an atheist what he'd do if presented with proof of god, their answer is simply "Well, there's no god, so that can't happen. Any proof with which I am presented would be false." Okay here goes. Say god presented to me proof that he existed and was willing to enter into conversation with my. God: Okay, feeling a bit stupid now aren't you. Me: Possibly, though can I ask you a few questions. God: Sure Me: Where did you come from? What would God answer? a) Some pre-universe soup of supernatural proteins, preceded by amino acids. b) Oh, a higher been made me, not sure why though. c) He didn't know, perhaps a higher being, though science is making previous claims of this pretty shaky. Is god an atheist? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|