Clarkson censured for 'bit gay' car gibe

On Sat, 26 May 2007 23:12:03 +0100, "Beeblebear"
the presidentfsnet.co.uk wrote:

We do not say that we have no scientific evidence that these things are
alive, therefore they are not alive. We simply say "It's life Jim, but
not
as we know it."

Not as far as I'm aware. But I'll admit that I could be wrong.

I work at the Veterinary Laboratory Agency in the Histopathology section.
Trust me, they're considered alive.

I think it depends on how you define life. There's a continuous scale
with landmarks such as the ability to reproduce, the ability to
reproduce autonomously, all the way up to self-awareness, and you can
put the boundary between life and non-life at any of these. At one
time it was suggested that a teletype machine which could hold a
convincing converstion with Mr Turing by exhibiting all the external
responses of something that was self-aware might be considered to be
so. Awarding the status of life to a bunch of molecules that can't do
anything on their own might best be considered a borderline case about
which opinions may differ.

Rod.

Agamemnon wrote:

So who *exactly* is encouraging 'children to **** anything with a hole
including chickens'? I mean come on -- spell it out.

John Barrowman and Russell T Gayvies. Barrowman said that Captain Jack
was Omnisexual meaning that he'd **** anything with a hold, so when
Jonathan Ross asked Barrowman if here were stranded on a desert island
and the only other being there was a chicken, would he **** it, he
replied in the affirmative, "yes I would" he said.

Not only are you referring to two separate conversations that appear not
to be linked by anything, you also fail entirely to mention where these
'children' come into it.

I haven't laughed so much in years. Isaac Newton was a delusional
maniac.... LOLFOMC.

'Laughing out loud felching off my cock'?

There are usually fundamentally sound reasons why people don't get
married, and being a nutjob with bizarre personal habits must come
near the top of the tree.

Oh, you mean like being gay?

Isaac Newton was gay as well?

I think you'll find I was referring to you, you cat-****ing freak.

You are the one who endorses cat sex. I have always said I am against
its, including when it was shown in Doctor Who. That makes you the crazy.

'That makes you the crazy'. You sound like the Greek kebab seller down
the street. I must ask him about the classical education he no doubt got
as a child.

Now try ten living people whose opinions I can actually canvass.

You can canvas their opinions in the afterlife or you can read their
published works. The choice is yours.

There is no afterlife.

And how do you know that? Have you been there and come back to tell us
its not there?

The question is how you know that there *is*.

Give nme the names of ten people I can canvass *right now*.

Show me a picture of you in a sexy pose and I will find you 10 clients
as you asked.


I fully expect that you will be utterly incapable of doing so, which
ought to surprise no one much.

Picture first, clients later.

QED.

--
marc

"Animals do give their consent to humans to **** them, but only someone
who is mentally deranged or a pervert or both would take up the offer.
-- Aggy"

marc_CH wrote:

[ Agamemnon]

*Bat***** crazy.

Yes, he is. Which makes arguing with him a bit boring
after a while. His delusions are so well entrenched
that there's no way for reality to touch him.

Oh, and I see he's now gone from calling you a lesbian
to calling you a whore. He did that with me, too. It
seems to be the only way he can think of a woman.
It makes you wonder about his family life, doesn't
it?

Diane L.

On Sun, 27 May 2007 01:29:57 +0100, "Agamemnon"
wrote:


Ah. This will be the Aggy dictionary. The one that contains words that
don't exist, and redefines words that do exist.

So now you are having paranoid delusions that words do not exist.

They don't exist in the OED, which is widely considered a good
authority on such things.

Rod.

"marc_CH" wrote in message
...
Agamemnon wrote:

Well it seems you have been hoisted by your own petard.

'Hoist', not 'hoisted', Cat****er.

The word is hoisted lesbian girl. Hoist is the wrong tense.


You've lost the argument with an own goal. 1:0 to me.

If Shakespeare can coin the word accommodation then I can coin the word
idiogenogamosis.

It appears that I have just caused you to confess that you made the word
up. The Greek chap seems to think he's a goal up, only to find they
switched ends at half time.

Yes, lesbian girl. The problem is you did not realise this until half way
through the second half after you sent the ball flying into the back of your
own net. I bet you wanted the rest of the girls to rub you up. 1:0 to me
still.

On Sun, 27 May 2007 01:32:33 +0100, "Agamemnon"
wrote:

For a word to be of any use, it has to be understood not just by the
writer but also by the reader. And as your words are understood by no-one
(other than yourself), they're not particularly useful, are they?

They are understood by anyone who has had a classical education or can
comprehend the contexts of sentences, whereas the term homosexual is not
since it is a nonsense word. Its components are not even constructed from
the same language.


Neither are the components of the word "television", yet here we are
in a newsgroup which is supposed to be for the discussion of it.

Or have you a new word for television too?

Rod.

"marc_CH" wrote in message
...
Agamemnon wrote:


"marc_CH" wrote in message
...
Agamemnon wrote:

Says who?

Go and read it and you will find out.

http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/eu...e_00_intro.htm

Read it. It's predicated on religious beliefs as it is therefore *ipso
facto* drivel.

NO ITS NOT.

You obviously have not read it.

Er. Yes I did.

All of it In 25 minutes. Yer, really.


It's predicated on religious beliefs.


No its not. Its aim is to dispel them.

It is therefore *ipso facto* drivel.

What bit of this don't you believe?

Go read it lesbian girl, then we will talk.


--
marc

"ThePunisher" wrote in message
...
Beeblebear wrote:
"ThePunisher" wrote in message
...
Stephen Wilson wrote:

Hardcore aetheists can be just as irrational as hardcore Christians.

How many people have be persecuted or killed by hardcore aetheists?


Stalin
Mao
Pol Pot

I wonder what C word these three have in common? which is basically a
religon.

Communism is not a religion. Those who refused to give up their religion
tended to do very badly indeed in communist nations.

Does adding up their combined death tolls give you a reasonable start?

To quote my wife
Blaming religion for the crusades is like blaming marriage for
domestic violence.


And yet no religion equals no crusades, strange that.

No religion means rulers finding a different reason for going to war.
People who desire violence will use whatever they need to justify their
desire.

--
--
Chris Lyth - shoot the president to reply)

Money is the root of all evil, and man needs roots




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

ThePunisher spoke thusly:
Agamemnon wrote:
"Stephen Wilson" wrote in message
news

"Agamemnon" wrote in message
...


Oh look whose talking. And homosexual isn't a made up word is it.

At least my words make sense

For a word to be of any use, it has to be understood not just by the
writer but also by the reader. And as your words are understood by
no-one (other than yourself), they're not particularly useful, are
they?

They are understood by anyone who has had a classical education or can
comprehend the contexts of sentences, whereas the term homosexual is
not since it is a nonsense word. Its components are not even
constructed from the same language.

Google search,

Results 1 - 50 of about 15,100,000 for homosexual

Results 1 - 3 of 3 for kolofilia

Results 1 - 26 of 26 for idiogenogamosis

It should be noted that most or all of these results are forums where
aggay has posted his nonsense.

"Agamemnon" wrote in message
...
snip
No it was the cat that lifted its tail up and pointed its arse at my face.
It is a signal to a male cat to mate with it. I know that because it it
did
the same thing with its boy friend in my back garden.

You watched it propositioning another cat???

Cameron
--
"Looking back on it, it probably would have been better if
we had given the catcus some lines." - Chris Bidmead (1987)
- Meg Lost summary by Charles Daniels

http://members.fortunecity.com/masomika/

http://members.fortunecity.com/jpcovers/