Clarkson censured for 'bit gay' car gibe

On Fri, 25 May 2007 09:31:30 GMT, "Southpaw"
wrote:

Seriously, I have not ****ed myself this much in years!

Be careful. That might be an abomination of some sort too.

Then again, as long as you don't involve the cat, you're probably OK.

Rod.

On Fri, 25 May 2007 11:47:43 +0100, Stewart Smith
wrote:

WRONG. By consenting to anal sex they have shown that they are immature.
It is the duty of the law to protect the immature and those who cannot
tell the difference between right and wrong. These people need medical
treatment. When an animal gives its consent to a human to have sex with
it it is incapable of understanding what it is consenting to, for
example when Dolphins place their penises in peoples hands. Someone who
was sound of mind would not take advantage of something like this.


Is that your excuse for doing it then? First cats, now dolphins. You
really are a friend to all the animals...

Well, at least there's some educational benefit to all this. I now
know a little more about dolphins than I knew yesterday.

Rod.

Lurch told the audient void (and rec.arts.drwho):
On Fri, 25 May 2007 11:27:21 +0100, Darren Wilkinson
[email protected] mused:
[I wrote something about colour TV and Doctor Who]
You've just brought this thread dangerously close to being on topic for both
groups. How DARE you!

APOLOGIZE!

ITYM apologise.

OK, by way of apology, here's some pointless off-topic pedantry :-)

Both "apologize" and "apologise" are acceptable spellings in the UK.
The "-ize" version is older, and is what the Americans decided to use.
There's no need to correct the "z" version to the "s" version, unless
you're engaged in the noble pursuit of causing minor irritation to
overseas readers.

--
Remove caps when replying

``Yes, we pronounce "herbs" as "herbs", and not "'erbs", because THERE'S
A ****ING "H" THERE.'' -- Eddie Izzard

In article ,
Roderick Stewart wrote:
Well, at least there's some educational benefit to all this. I now
know a little more about dolphins than I knew yesterday.

As long as it's not 'know' in the biblical sense.

Not that I'm implying the bible can't be taken at face value or anything.

--
*Never kick a cow pat on a hot day *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article . com,
zarbiface wrote:
On 25 May, 02:35, "Agamemnon" wrote:


As I said you celarly have not kept cats as pets or even met any.

I pointed its arse at my face and lifted its tail up, and kept doing this
even when I move to a location.



LOL! Why the f**k would you do that you loony? Leave the cat's arse
alone!


What a tail/tale.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is Ici
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
PEI!! On 28 May Get rid of the extremists and VOTE LIBERAL!

On 25 May, 11:47, Stewart Smith wrote:
Agamemnon wrote:
Dolphins place their penises in peoples hands. Someone who
was sound of mind would not take advantage of something like this.

Is that your excuse for doing it then? First cats, now dolphins. You
really are a friend to all the animals...

Stewart


Don't forget the pigs. Agaymon likes watching pig bestiality videos
remember. He admitted it here.

In article ,
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Agamemnon wrote:
You are the one who is strange. The British are an international
laughing stock because of their love of anal sex, or rather in reality
a small minorities love of it and the complete apathy of everyone else
towards it. Just wait until they see Torchwood and they have even more
ammunition by which to mock us with. Europeans consider this entire
nation to be a nation of gays.

And perhaps the 'gayest' place on earth - Mykonos - is situated exactly
where?


Great Greece/Grease!
--
Member - Liberal International
This is Ici
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
PEI!! On 28 May Get rid of the extremists and VOTE LIBERAL!

On 25 May, 11:16, "Agamemnon" wrote:

It was sitting on a gate pillar and pointed its arse at my face with
its tail held high. This is the signal a female gives to a male to mount it.




Yes, the signal a cat gives TO ANOTHER CAT to mount it, not a mad
human Whovian! Down boy!

This is indeed the funniest thread on usenet this week. ;-)

On 25 May, 07:41, "Agamemnon" wrote:


How can you hold your head up in public. It is people like you that give the
British their reputation on the continent of liking it up the arse. How does
it feel when you make this country into an international laughing stock when
you go abroad by your love of anal sex?



And of course you'd know that because you're such a globetrotter.
Except for the days when you're here EVERY DAY.

On Fri, 25 May 2007 00:29:20 +0100, Bill Wright
wrote:

Take away someone's religion and part of their world crumbles.
Of course. I respect the psychological help that religion gives its
adherents. A belief system that supports people through difficult times has
a lot to commend it, even though it might be based on a series of fallacies.
I'm excluding from this lunatic fringe amongst the religious, of course.
It's important than we don't condemn all religion just because (a) there
isn't a god and (b) there is a lunatic fringe. There are large numbers of
ordinary people who gain great comfort and strength from their beliefs. I
for one would never attempt to take that away from them. After all, they'll
never find out that there isn't a god will they, so they won't suffer any
disillusionment.


What I find most curious about hardcore athiests is the almost
religious devotion they have to the notion that "god does not exist".
Not "God probably doesn't exist", or "There is not sufficient evidence
to reasonably conclude that god exists," but "God absolutely does not
exist."

I often get the feeling that vocal atheists are just as religious --
or even more -- than hardcore religious nutjobs, it's just that the
god they worship is the absence-of-god.

God may or may not exist. As it happens, I believe he does, and you
don't. Some people think that their beliefe makes them right -- as
you seem to. As it happens, I don't think that. It seems to me to be
very strange that I so rarely meet a vocal athiest who is even willing
to consider the possibility that he is wrong, but I often meet people
of religious faith who are willing to consider the possibility.

It rather bothers me that such a large percentage of atheists manifest
the specific trait I like least about many of my fellow persons of
faith.