![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sky Anytime's web site quotes
(Coming soon to the most recent Sky+ boxes) So.. (your ahead of me aren't you) which boxes would these be ? and will the rest of us get Anytime ?....ever ? -- Vass |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Vass" wrote in message ... Sky Anytime's web site quotes (Coming soon to the most recent Sky+ boxes) So.. (your ahead of me aren't you) which boxes would these be ? and will the rest of us get Anytime ?....ever ? -- Vass The ones with the hidden 80Gb of disk space ..V3's. I'm not sure why you'd want it, I'd rather have the 80GB of disk and I certainly dont want it using any of my disk for a load of tat. I'd much rather choose my own tat to put on it. -- Tumbleweed email replies not necessary but to contact use; tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:59:50 +0100, "Tumbleweed" wrote:
"Vass" wrote in message ... Sky Anytime's web site quotes (Coming soon to the most recent Sky+ boxes) So.. (your ahead of me aren't you) which boxes would these be ? and will the rest of us get Anytime ?....ever ? -- Vass The ones with the hidden 80Gb of disk space ..V3's. I'm not sure why you'd want it, I'd rather have the 80GB of disk and I certainly dont want it using any of my disk for a load of tat. I'd much rather choose my own tat to put on it. Also the Sky HD boxes with the 160GB of hidden space. BTW Have I missed the point of Sky Anytime? As far as I understand it randomly records programmes that either you don't want to watch (which is why you didn't bother to record them in the first place) or cannot watch because you don't subscribe to that channel. What is supposed to be the Great Idea? -- Cheers Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Nigel Barker" wrote in message ... On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:59:50 +0100, "Tumbleweed" wrote: "Vass" wrote in message ... Sky Anytime's web site quotes (Coming soon to the most recent Sky+ boxes) So.. (your ahead of me aren't you) which boxes would these be ? and will the rest of us get Anytime ?....ever ? -- Vass The ones with the hidden 80Gb of disk space ..V3's. I'm not sure why you'd want it, I'd rather have the 80GB of disk and I certainly dont want it using any of my disk for a load of tat. I'd much rather choose my own tat to put on it. Also the Sky HD boxes with the 160GB of hidden space. BTW Have I missed the point of Sky Anytime? As far as I understand it randomly records programmes that either you don't want to watch (which is why you didn't bother to record them in the first place) or cannot watch because you don't subscribe to that channel. What is supposed to be the Great Idea? -- Cheers Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur I do find the Anytime service moderately useful. Whilst I would prefer to have the disk space for my own choices, I do find programmes that I would not have thought about recording myself. If there is nothing worth watching live, a quick browse through the Anytime can sometimes produce something to watch. Cheers Bonzo |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:43:38 +0100, Edster wrote:
Its so that broadcasters and programme sponsors can pay Sky to have their programmes pushed at viewers instead of just advertising inbetween programmes. Now that Anytime has launched you will of course be wanting to retract all your previous untrue statements about it being used to push advertising at you... won't you? -- |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Zero Tolerance" Now that Anytime has launched you will of course be wanting to retract really? how do you know? nothing visible on my box, where will I find it? -- Vass |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:33:45 +0100, Edster wrote:
Why would I want to do that? Credibility? -- |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:07:42 +0100, Edster wrote:
(Zero Tolerance) wrote in message On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:33:45 +0100, Edster wrote: Why would I want to do that? Credibility? The last I heard they were still going along with the idea. No credibility there, then. -- |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:07:06 +0100, Edster wrote:
Why would I want to do that? Credibility? The last I heard they were still going along with the idea. No credibility there, then. When did they ever? Wasn't talking about them.. -- |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recent Aldi confusion about "HD TV" ? | Mike | UK home cinema | 7 | September 5th 05 03:06 PM |
| Recent Mux 2 degradation | aa | UK digital tv | 23 | June 10th 05 10:55 PM |
| WTF: New (recent) Projector Reviews | MrC1 | Home theater (general) | 2 | April 16th 05 09:57 PM |
| Recent test | Bob Miller | High definition TV | 39 | January 29th 05 09:15 PM |
| Recent Poor FTV reception | RJH | UK digital tv | 1 | September 17th 03 08:45 AM |