![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know Video Senders exist for the purposes of taking a signal from a
set-top box, dvd player etc to send it around the house, but does anyone know of an equivalent for sending a TV aerial signal? I have a roof-mounted aerial whose wire terminates in the loft - seemingly snipped off by the previous occupant. I am not sure I have the necessary know-how to run the cable down the cavity wall etc, so is there any form of wireless alternative? D. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 04/04/2007 14:13, David Wright wrote:
I have a roof-mounted aerial whose wire terminates in the loft - seemingly snipped off by the previous occupant. I am not sure I have the necessary know-how to run the cable down the cavity wall etc, so is there any form of wireless alternative? Just install a self-help relay transmitter in your loft http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/chalaborough.asp then install another aerial downstairs to receive from it. make sure you use vertical polarisation though :-) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:13:43 +0100, "David Wright"
wrote: I know Video Senders exist for the purposes of taking a signal from a set-top box, dvd player etc to send it around the house, but does anyone know of an equivalent for sending a TV aerial signal? I have a roof-mounted aerial whose wire terminates in the loft - seemingly snipped off by the previous occupant. I am not sure I have the necessary know-how to run the cable down the cavity wall etc, so is there any form of wireless alternative? Duh? It's wireless already! Rod. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:08:54 +0100, Roderick Stewart
wrote: On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:13:43 +0100, "David Wright" wrote: I know Video Senders exist for the purposes of taking a signal from a set-top box, dvd player etc to send it around the house, but does anyone know of an equivalent for sending a TV aerial signal? I have a roof-mounted aerial whose wire terminates in the loft - seemingly snipped off by the previous occupant. I am not sure I have the necessary know-how to run the cable down the cavity wall etc, so is there any form of wireless alternative? Duh? It's wireless already! Rod. You would need to re-broadcast the signal on the same frequencies which is illegal, but possible. Install a high gain booster amp in your loft and connect the outrdoor aerial to it's input. Then connect another aerial to it's output and point the aerial in the desired direction for reception. Connect a set top aerial to the TV and you're away! Warning. The signal may be of poor quality. Marky P. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Marky P
writes Warning. The signal may be of poor quality. Marky P. Warning. You may fall out with your neighbours when they find out that you are responsible for interfering with their TV reception. This has been done to good effect but it can also produce problems too. -- Bill |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"David Wright" wrote in message
... I know Video Senders exist for the purposes of taking a signal from a set-top box, dvd player etc to send it around the house, but does anyone know of an equivalent for sending a TV aerial signal? I have a roof-mounted aerial whose wire terminates in the loft - seemingly snipped off by the previous occupant. I am not sure I have the necessary know-how to run the cable down the cavity wall etc, so is there any form of wireless alternative? Find a suitably "quiet" corner of the rooms between the cable and the TV, choose your CT100 aerial cable colour to match the decor and run the cable down the wall. You will have to drill through the ceilings and floor of the 1st floor to reach the ground floor but the result should be perfectly reasonable. Bill Wright and others will also suggest joining the wire using F-connectors. Don't just twist them together and cover with insulating tape! Bill and others can comment on the downsides of using a Belling (normal TV aerial plug/socket) arrangement instead, for those of us who don't possess the neccessary crimping tools for F-connectors. Just a thought, have you got a small enough TV to take into the loft? Might be worth checking you get a good enough picture to warrant the work before you start. If you need a new aerial anyway, you can get the installer to put the cable down the outside wall. And if you need a new aerial, tell the NG where you live and they'll be able to give some hints. Sadly "experienced" fitters often turn up and just fit a big "digital" (aka wideband) aerial when a grouped aerial would be corret, smaller and more effective. Paul DS. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Marky P
writes On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:08:54 +0100, Roderick Stewart wrote: On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:13:43 +0100, "David Wright" wrote: I know Video Senders exist for the purposes of taking a signal from a set-top box, dvd player etc to send it around the house, but does anyone know of an equivalent for sending a TV aerial signal? I have a roof-mounted aerial whose wire terminates in the loft - seemingly snipped off by the previous occupant. I am not sure I have the necessary know-how to run the cable down the cavity wall etc, so is there any form of wireless alternative? Duh? It's wireless already! Rod. You would need to re-broadcast the signal on the same frequencies which is illegal, but possible. Install a high gain booster amp in your loft and connect the outrdoor aerial to it's input. Then connect another aerial to it's output and point the aerial in the desired direction for reception. Connect a set top aerial to the TV and you're away! Warning. The signal may be of poor quality. Marky P. Setting up the active relay described above seems a fun idea, but it should not be undertaken without having a complete understanding of the technicalities, and should not be done without proper approval. You certainly won't get this just to avoid cabling your house.! You need to consider the isolation required between the two aerials. If the gain of the amplifier exceeds the isolation, you will have made an oscillator. You really don't want to do that. In practice, you will have to do a lot better than that. I reckon that, to re-transmit a reasonably flat signal (+/-1dB), the isolation between the aerials minus the gain of the amplifier will have to be greater than 20dB (and preferably a lot more). Be aware that the re-transmitted signal will interfere with the signal arriving directly at neighbouring TV aerials (and vice versa). As it will be on exactly the same frequency/ies, it won't cause patterning. The two signals will add or subtract (depending on the phase relationship). The re-transmitted signal needs to 'swamp' the direct signal (ie be at least 20dB stronger). Even if you achieve this in your property, you are going to upset those neighbours who are watching the direct signal. Because of time delays, the re-transmitted signal may also cause a ghost on the direct signal. Its visibility will depend on how long the delay is, and the how strong the ghost is. No, you don't really want to do this!! Ian. -- |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 4 Apr, 14:13, "David Wright" wrote:
I know Video Senders exist for the purposes of taking a signal from a set-top box, dvd player etc to send it around the house, but does anyone know of an equivalent for sending a TV aerial signal? I have a roof-mounted aerial whose wire terminates in the loft - seemingly snipped off by the previous occupant. I am not sure I have the necessary know-how to run the cable down the cavity wall etc, so is there any form of wireless alternative? D. It may be (If this is a "new" house) that the builders left it like that and the previous occupant didn't do anything about it. If you are happy to have just the one channel at a time, you could put a freeview box in the loft together with a wireless transmitter of a type which will allow the remote control signal to be passed back to the box, but if people are going to be moving around, some of these aren't much good. Don't forget you could always get "Freesat from Sky" instead, all installed for £150 and all the equipment is yours to keep. Alternatively, for just a little more, you could sign up to Sky's basic package and that way tou don'thave to pay in one lump (make sure you give them plenty of notice of cancellation so you only pay for 12 months). After the 12 months is up, the kit acts just like a Freesat from Sky rig (and you still own it all). The Freesat channel line up is slightly different to freeview though. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul D.Smith wrote:
snip Bill Wright and others will also suggest joining the wire using F-connectors. Don't just twist them together and cover with insulating tape! Bill and others can comment on the downsides of using a Belling (normal TV aerial plug/socket) arrangement instead, for those of us who don't possess the neccessary crimping tools for F-connectors. snip Screw on 'F' connectors work just about as well, you don't need crimping tools. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
....snip...
Screw on 'F' connectors work just about as well, you don't need crimping tools. Thanks for that - I didn't know such things existed. Paul DS |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wireless aerial extender? | Victor Delta | UK digital tv | 4 | October 30th 06 09:29 PM |
| Sky running through house aerial cables | paul b51 | UK sky | 6 | November 17th 05 01:52 PM |
| Running 2 coax cables from 1 aerial | Harvey Van Sickle | UK digital tv | 11 | October 10th 05 05:00 PM |
| Wireless, or other alternative interconnects? | Hal | High definition TV | 0 | December 29th 04 05:06 PM |
| Hiding Cables on walls? Running cable under carpet? | Reo | Home theater (general) | 5 | January 2nd 04 01:59 AM |