![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:16:43 -0400, "Ross Moody"
wrote: HI-DEF or LOW DEF NBC nightly news is nothing but Democratic drivel w/o a editorial disclaimer IMHO. That's Redneck talk. A_C |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 24, 2:08 pm, Agent_C wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:16:43 -0400, "Ross Moody" wrote: HI-DEF or LOW DEF NBC nightly news is nothing but Democratic drivel w/o a editorial disclaimer IMHO. That's Redneck talk. A_C Interesting how left leaners often start with name calling. GG |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 24, 8:39 pm, "G-squared" wrote:
On Mar 24, 2:08 pm, Agent_C wrote: On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:16:43 -0400, "Ross Moody" wrote: HI-DEF or LOW DEF NBC nightly news is nothing but Democratic drivel w/o a editorial disclaimer IMHO. That's Redneck talk. A_C Interesting how left leaners often start with name calling. GG I guess "Democratic drivel" isn't namecalling. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Phil Ross wrote:
that female impersonator Ann Coulter. C'mon, admit it, you'd jump at the opportunity to get into her pants. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 24, 8:59 pm, wrote:
On Mar 24, 8:39 pm, "G-squared" wrote: On Mar 24, 2:08 pm, Agent_C wrote: On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:16:43 -0400, "Ross Moody" wrote: HI-DEF or LOW DEF NBC nightly news is nothing but Democratic drivel w/o a editorial disclaimer IMHO. That's Redneck talk. A_C Interesting how left leaners often start with name calling. GG I guess "Democratic drivel" isn't namecalling. Touche' GG |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Phil Ross wrote:
I suppose that you prefer the "real" news from Fox, Fox's coverage is center to center-right, in a tabloid type format. It isn't conservative by any objective definition; there is no conservative major news outlet. What's more, the majority of its staff, including its newscasters, are Democratic Party contributors. and the balanced "reporting" of Bill O'Reilly In case you hadn't figured it out, O'Reilly is not a newscaster. He's an editorialist, in the scandal-mongering tradition of Walter Winchell, Drew Pearson, and Jack Anderson. Of course O'Reilly's "reporting" is going to be biased, for the simple reason that it isn't reporting and doesn't pretend to be. O'Reilly's main business is to gore oxen, and he gores conservative oxen almost as much as he gores liberal oxen. Take a listen to his spiel in favor of gun control sometime. Personally, I prefer hard news; and I don't particularly care for O'Reilly's brand of editorializing. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:37:24 -0700, Mark Crispin
wrote: On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Phil Ross wrote: I suppose that you prefer the "real" news from Fox, Fox's coverage is center to center-right, in a tabloid type format. It isn't conservative by any objective definition; there is no conservative major news outlet. What's more, the majority of its staff, including its newscasters, are Democratic Party contributors. Bull. Thumper and the balanced "reporting" of Bill O'Reilly In case you hadn't figured it out, O'Reilly is not a newscaster. He's an editorialist, in the scandal-mongering tradition of Walter Winchell, Drew Pearson, and Jack Anderson. Of course O'Reilly's "reporting" is going to be biased, for the simple reason that it isn't reporting and doesn't pretend to be. O'Reilly's main business is to gore oxen, and he gores conservative oxen almost as much as he gores liberal oxen. Take a listen to his spiel in favor of gun control sometime. Personally, I prefer hard news; and I don't particularly care for O'Reilly's brand of editorializing. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"G-squared" wrote in message
ups.com... On Mar 24, 8:59 pm, wrote: On Mar 24, 8:39 pm, "G-squared" wrote: On Mar 24, 2:08 pm, Agent_C wrote: On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:16:43 -0400, "Ross Moody" wrote: HI-DEF or LOW DEF NBC nightly news is nothing but Democratic drivel w/o a editorial disclaimer IMHO. That's Redneck talk. A_C Interesting how left leaners often start with name calling. GG I guess "Democratic drivel" isn't namecalling. Touche' GG ============================= Actually it is not namecalling, it is merely statement of opinion! |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mark Crispin" wrote in message
... On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Phil Ross wrote: I suppose that you prefer the "real" news from Fox, Fox's coverage is center to center-right, in a tabloid type format. It isn't conservative by any objective definition; there is no conservative major news outlet. ============================ Absolutely correct! |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 23, 1:21?pm, Agent_C wrote:
Just got this... So what programs are NBC news? Would that include CNBC and CNN? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Monday Night Football: Where's the HD? | Mack McKinnon | High definition TV | 9 | November 9th 04 02:06 AM |
| new look sky news on monday | AJD | UK sky | 4 | February 18th 04 01:42 PM |
| MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL IN HD? | Jt6565 | High definition TV | 1 | November 23rd 03 11:40 PM |
| ABC MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL IN HD | epiedad | High definition TV | 4 | August 7th 03 01:54 AM |