![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steve" wrote in message . uk... Hi, I have a new plasma tv (42") which has a resolution of 1024 x 768. I have a Virgin Media V+ box connected to the TV via a HDMI cable. My V+ box has a setting where the output can be 720 or 1080 or 720 wide or 1080 wide. Should I set the output to the lower or higher number and as the TV is obviously widescreen can I presume the 'wide' option is the correct one. Regards Steve Doesn't it have an "auto" option? I get a much better picture letting my Regza TV scale SD rather than let my SKY HD digibox do it. Then again I get a much better SD picture via component than by HDMI. HDMI lets far too much detail though for most crap SD broadcasts but it's great for HD. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... that's true of any tv - watch a decent quality 14" regular tv - if you can find such a thing, and it will look a lot nicer than the same picture on a 28" regular tv - never mind a 42" plasma. I'm just thinking, I bet 1024x768 looks really **** at 40"? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... it's a higher res than SD - some owners would argue you wouldnt notice that it's not quite there. plus you have a nice big picture to look at. Does it suffer from worse picture the bigger the size? Like if you have a 26" LCD and a 32" LCD both at 1366x768, the 32" picture may actually be worse than the 26" version. I would say so, yes. Thanks Welcome. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
it's probably meant to be 1024 x 720.
"Beck" wrote in message ... "Steve" wrote in message . uk... Hi, I have a new plasma tv (42") which has a resolution of 1024 x 768. Is that the right resolution for a 42" screen? |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beck wrote:
"the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... that's true of any tv - watch a decent quality 14" regular tv - if you can find such a thing, and it will look a lot nicer than the same picture on a 28" regular tv - never mind a 42" plasma. I'm just thinking, I bet 1024x768 looks really **** at 40"? LANGUAGE GIRL!!! |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... that's true of any tv - watch a decent quality 14" regular tv - if you can find such a thing, and it will look a lot nicer than the same picture on a 28" regular tv - never mind a 42" plasma. I'm just thinking, I bet 1024x768 looks really **** at 40"? LANGUAGE GIRL!!! Sorry. I bet 1024x768 looks really ****ing awful at 40" Is that better? ;-) |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beck wrote:
"Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... that's true of any tv - watch a decent quality 14" regular tv - if you can find such a thing, and it will look a lot nicer than the same picture on a 28" regular tv - never mind a 42" plasma. I'm just thinking, I bet 1024x768 looks really **** at 40"? LANGUAGE GIRL!!! Sorry. I bet 1024x768 looks really ****ing awful at 40" Is that better? ;-) You just wait till I get you back to UGVM!!! |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... that's true of any tv - watch a decent quality 14" regular tv - if you can find such a thing, and it will look a lot nicer than the same picture on a 28" regular tv - never mind a 42" plasma. I'm just thinking, I bet 1024x768 looks really **** at 40"? LANGUAGE GIRL!!! Sorry. I bet 1024x768 looks really ****ing awful at 40" Is that better? ;-) You just wait till I get you back to UGVM!!! Am I in for a spanking? |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beck wrote:
"Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... that's true of any tv - watch a decent quality 14" regular tv - if you can find such a thing, and it will look a lot nicer than the same picture on a 28" regular tv - never mind a 42" plasma. I'm just thinking, I bet 1024x768 looks really **** at 40"? LANGUAGE GIRL!!! Sorry. I bet 1024x768 looks really ****ing awful at 40" Is that better? ;-) You just wait till I get you back to UGVM!!! Am I in for a spanking? goes and gets the naughty belt/ |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "Resident Drunk" wrote in message ... Beck wrote: "the dog from that film you saw" wrote in message ... that's true of any tv - watch a decent quality 14" regular tv - if you can find such a thing, and it will look a lot nicer than the same picture on a 28" regular tv - never mind a 42" plasma. I'm just thinking, I bet 1024x768 looks really **** at 40"? LANGUAGE GIRL!!! Sorry. I bet 1024x768 looks really ****ing awful at 40" Is that better? ;-) You just wait till I get you back to UGVM!!! Am I in for a spanking? goes and gets the naughty belt/ No wait... I can see the scars from Scoopex. I will behave from now on :-)) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HD Resolution | Kevin Lewis | UK sky | 12 | June 7th 06 10:25 PM |
| Resolution | kingtone | High definition TV | 6 | January 13th 06 05:07 AM |
| Using HD-TV for better PC resolution? | Technology Guy | High definition TV | 4 | December 2nd 04 09:59 PM |
| 4:3 VS 16:9 - same resolution? | dave nuckles | High definition TV | 4 | May 1st 04 04:57 PM |
| Resolution ? | K | High definition TV | 1 | February 10th 04 09:13 PM |