![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have been using the SA4200HD for a week or so. All the HD channels have been pretty good so far, especially BravoHD when they broadcast a concert, however, "The West Wing" looks horrible when it is broadcast on BravoHD. It seems like the faces are pixelating and, or muddy looking. Has anyone had the same experience? I have IO Cablevision on Long Island. Lou |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lou" wrote in message et... I have been using the SA4200HD for a week or so. All the HD channels have been pretty good so far, especially BravoHD when they broadcast a concert, however, "The West Wing" looks horrible when it is broadcast on BravoHD. It seems like the faces are pixelating and, or muddy looking. Has anyone had the same experience? I have IO Cablevision on Long Island. Lou What type of HDTV are you using? West Wing on Bravo looks very good on our Mits rear projector through the Motorolla DCT 6200 cable box. West Wing tend to be darker than a lot of other shows with a lot of shadowy interior shots. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The West Wing has the worst all around broadcast quality of any show on TV. The picture is habitually out-of-focus--even the character who is in the center of the screen and talking at the camera is fuzzed out. Nothing is ever fully in focus. Recently far too many of the scenes have been shot with hand-held cameras and are very jittery. The sound is muddy all of the time. While we otherwise like the show, my wife and I are continually asking each other, "What the hell diid he say?" And this applies to standard definition tube-type TV. In HDTV, these things are worse. The 3D visual effect that you see from many HDTV programs requires that the entire scene be in focus, including the background and foreground--not to mention the subject of the shot. This show is a waste of good bandwidth. --e On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 03:38:20 GMT, "Lou" wrote: I have been using the SA4200HD for a week or so. All the HD channels have been pretty good so far, especially BravoHD when they broadcast a concert, however, "The West Wing" looks horrible when it is broadcast on BravoHD. It seems like the faces are pixelating and, or muddy looking. Has anyone had the same experience? I have IO Cablevision on Long Island. Lou |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree, the sound is terrible, and actors try to cover lousy writing by
talking too fast. We stopped watching it. Ross "einride" wrote in message ... The West Wing has the worst all around broadcast quality of any show on TV. The picture is habitually out-of-focus--even the character who is in the center of the screen and talking at the camera is fuzzed out. Nothing is ever fully in focus. Recently far too many of the scenes have been shot with hand-held cameras and are very jittery. The sound is muddy all of the time. While we otherwise like the show, my wife and I are continually asking each other, "What the hell diid he say?" And this applies to standard definition tube-type TV. In HDTV, these things are worse. The 3D visual effect that you see from many HDTV programs requires that the entire scene be in focus, including the background and foreground--not to mention the subject of the shot. This show is a waste of good bandwidth. --e On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 03:38:20 GMT, "Lou" wrote: I have been using the SA4200HD for a week or so. All the HD channels have been pretty good so far, especially BravoHD when they broadcast a concert, however, "The West Wing" looks horrible when it is broadcast on BravoHD. It seems like the faces are pixelating and, or muddy looking. Has anyone had the same experience? I have IO Cablevision on Long Island. Lou |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The picture is habitually out-of-focus--even the character who is in
the center of the screen and talking at the camera is fuzzed out. Nothing is ever fully in focus. Recently far too many of the scenes have been shot with hand-held cameras and are very jittery. I don't think it's fair to put *all* the blame on the Bravo network. I've had the chance to compare the HD OTA feed of the latest West Wing episodes with the reruns on Bravo (both via Dish Network and via Comcast cable in Washington, DC) on my Sony 32XBR400, and I think I'm qualified to comment here. To be sure, the HD OTA feed looks slightly crisper, but not by much. The production design of the show is such that it's *supposed* to look dark and moody and atmospheric. Notice how the lighting is arranged, with alternating pools of bright incandescent light and areas of shadow. (Take it from a federal government employee. That's NOT how the offices look in real life.) Note how the characters are often in motion from light areas to dark areas as they deliver their lines. The intent, I suppose, is to create some kind of visual drama in a show that is VERY dialog intensive. Also note the camera's soft focus. Again, this is by design and the idea is to create a mood. All in all, the people in Hollywood who control how the West Wing looks don't want it to look like the Tonight Show. They're going for atmosphere. So even when I watch a brand new episode via the digital UHF broadcast of the 1080i feed from my local NBC affiliate, the West Wing looks dark and moody and a little out of focus. When I watch the reruns on Bravo, I occasionally notice some compression artifacts. But that's probably when the real time bandwidth allocation at Dish Network or Comcast is temporarily squeezing the bitstream just a trifle too much. The sound is muddy all of the time. While we otherwise like the show, my wife and I are continually asking each other, "What the hell diid he say?" I concede the West Wing's dialog comes fast and furious. And sometimes the writers include lines that aren't really necessary to the plot, sort of the verbal equivalent to background extras in a scene. (During a walk and talk Josh will say to Toby something like: "Sanders and Morgan have been out to get us ever since we rolled them on S. Res. 248. Now they think they've got a shot to derail the Mathias nomination to the Fourth Circuit, but they'll be singing a different tune after we add that rider to the CR directing the BRC to zero out the Williston Depot." Then the dialog will shift to something integral to the plot. I often find myself wracking my brain to keep up with the irrelevant details.) But I have not noticed that the actual audio quality is bad, either on Bravo or via the OTA feed. And I'm not using any fancy audio setup - just the speakers in my Sony Wega. I *do* miss lines here and there. But that's because they're talking so rapidly, or Toby's doing his anguished sotto vocce thing again. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul Michael Brown ) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
Then the dialog will shift to something integral to the plot. I often find myself wracking my brain to keep up with the irrelevant details.) Many of these details aren't irrelevant, and come up later (or were something that happened before). -- Jeff Rife | For address harvesters: | http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/OverTheHedge/StarWars1.gif | | | |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are all correct. HDTV makes a bad recording even worst. I don't believe
that West Wing is recorded in HD. Looks more like the Wide Screen programming that Fox calls High Resoluion, It is the poorest quality HD that I have encountered. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help please: picture quality problem | khobar | High definition TV | 4 | January 23rd 04 04:40 PM |
| how do i make the picture quality better? | Apkesh | High definition TV | 1 | January 22nd 04 12:12 AM |
| Poor Picture Quality on Comcast Cable B | Eugene Zhang | High definition TV | 1 | January 21st 04 06:29 AM |
| Resolution | Thomas A. Fine | High definition TV | 114 | December 12th 03 06:56 PM |
| Will a DVI connection give me better picture quality from component video on a rear projection monitor?. | Nospam | High definition TV | 3 | December 7th 03 06:21 AM |