![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
In fact I am a Christian and channel 767 is the Inspiration network, a
Christian Broadcast channel.. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lawrence Zarb wrote:
In fact I am a Christian and channel 767 is the Inspiration network, a Christian Broadcast channel.. Couldn't God boost the signal strength for you? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vaughan wrote:
Lawrence Zarb wrote: In fact I am a Christian and channel 767 is the Inspiration network, a Christian Broadcast channel.. Couldn't God boost the signal strength for you? Of course not, he doesn't exist! |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lawrence Zarb" wrote in message news:[email protected] .mailgate.org... In fact I am a Christian and channel 767 is the Inspiration network, a Christian Broadcast channel.. Yes well, I think having looked at the signal in some detail on your behalf this afternoon that if that channel was going to be an important part of my viewing I'd consider a Zone 2 dish. That's the slightly bigger one intended for the north-west third of the UK. I'm assuming you're not in the north-west third of the UK. . . Bill |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill,
I live in Surrey, and it was my consideration. As I have a second digibox I was thinking of replacing the LNB with a better twin/quad output unit. Would this also sove the problem? -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lawrence Zarb" wrote in message news:[email protected] .mailgate.org... Bill, I live in Surrey, and it was my consideration. As I have a second digibox I was thinking of replacing the LNB with a better twin/quad output unit. Would this also sove the problem? Only if the LNB you have now is performing less well than the new one would on that frequency, and if the degree of improvement is enough to cure the fault. I think the door-opening issue is a red herring. Your reception is marginal, that's all that matters. It could be the LNB that's faulty or it could be in spec but inadequate for a weak mux at the edge of the band. Slight dish misalignment or distortion could be responsible. The receiver could have a tuner problem affecting the top end only. The cable could be cheap/wet/kinked, affecting the top end only. Bill |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for your response Bill,
for your information I have already tried 2 other LNB's ,and another digibox. I have had this setup for 3 years now and its only in the last 4 months that I have been having this problem. At the moment I'm looking at getting the larger Zone 2 dish... Lawrence -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lawrence Zarb" wrote in message news:[email protected] .mailgate.org... Thanks for your response Bill, for your information I have already tried 2 other LNB's ,and another digibox. I have had this setup for 3 years now and its only in the last 4 months that I have been having this problem. At the moment I'm looking at getting the larger Zone 2 dish... Because the channel is at the top end of low band, the LNB downconverts it to a frequency right at the top of the satellite IF band. This means that the signal going down the coax is actually the highest frequency that the cable has to carry. Therefore the slightest cable fault is likely to be significant. I suggest you change the cable, or at least install a temporary cable as a test. I have seen instances in which the strength of the higher muxes at the receiver has been many dBs below the lower ones. Even when they remain strong enough per se, the fact that they are perhaps 25dB below others seems to upset many satellite receivers. Bill |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
... "Lawrence Zarb" wrote in message news:[email protected] .mailgate.org... Thanks for your response Bill, for your information I have already tried 2 other LNB's, and another digibox. I have had this setup for 3 years now and its only in the last 4 months that I have been having this problem. At the moment I'm looking at getting the larger Zone 2 dish... Because the channel is at the top end of low band, the LNB downconverts it to a frequency right at the top of the satellite IF band. This means that the signal going down the coax is actually the highest frequency that the cable has to carry. Therefore the slightest cable fault is likely to be significant. I suggest you change the cable, or at least install a temporary cable as a test. I have seen instances in which the strength of the higher muxes at the receiver has been many dBs below the lower ones. Even when they remain strong enough per se, the fact that they are perhaps 25dB below others seems to upset many satellite receivers. Bill Do you mean 25dB, or should it be 2.5dB or 2 to 5dB perhaps? 25dB sounds like a very big difference. If it really is 25dB then in theory you could still get some Sky channels with a dish that was "25dB smaller". By my calculations that would mean a 3cm dish! Perhaps that's how the "pipe antenna" works. I don't see how the capture area can be any larger than the end of the pipe which is about 12cm, making it equivalent to a 12cm dish, but the length of the pipe (about 1 metre) would work like a boresight and narrow the field of view enough to pick out just one satellite. Has anyone here ever tried a pipe antenna? |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Stephen" wrote in message ... "Bill Wright" wrote in message I have seen instances in which the strength of the higher muxes at the receiver has been many dBs below the lower ones. Even when they remain strong enough per se, the fact that they are perhaps 25dB below others seems to upset many satellite receivers. Bill Do you mean 25dB, or should it be 2.5dB or 2 to 5dB perhaps? 25dB sounds like a very big difference. If it really is 25dB then in theory you could still get some Sky channels with a dish that was "25dB smaller". By my calculations that would mean a 3cm dish! Unfortunately your calculations are based on an incorrect assumption. The dish size is required primarily to provide enough signal at the LNB to give an adequate ratio between the signal and the LNB noise. The signal is downconverted and amplified a great deal in the LNB, but of course the s/n ratio does not improve. The LNB output is far stronger than is needed at the receiver input. So quite horrendous things can happen between the LNB and the receiver. Once line power for the LNB is taken care of, the output from an LNB can be transmitted from a half wave dipole (about half an inch?) and received on a similar aerial several yards away, with good results. But receivers tend not to like massive inequalities of signal level. The high level of LNB outputs is a big factor in satellite IF breakthrough into UHF circuits. Bill |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|