![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dr. Personality writes:
As for me, I used a Rat Shack box to get basic cable on a '70s-era TV until I eventually replaced the set. Everything worked fine, and nobody at the two cable companies I dealt with back then ever had a problem with me doing it. I saved $2/mo for ten or twelve years. That's not a comparable situation. With analog TV, all the channels are "in the clear" and you just need a cable-ready tuner to see them. If you subscribe only to basic cable, the cable company generally filters out channels you don't pay for using an analog trap in the signal line before it enters your house. So the cable company doesn't care how you receive the remaining channels - with a cable-ready TV, an auxiliary box you bought from Radio Shack, or a box you rent from the cable company. Digital TV is technologically different. All the channels are on the cable that enters your house, and the decoder box in *your* house shows you only the channels you pay for. So the box becomes part of the cable company's delivery system, and they need to trust it. Requiring you to rent the box from them is the easiest way for them to decide it is trustworthy. As I understand it, there is movement towards a system where customers will be able to own most or all of the hardware needed for digital TV, while still providing reasonable security to the cable operator. Dave |
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
catv tech wrote: Zalek Bloom wrote: I wanted to add new cable box for my cable TV - Time Warner wants $10/month for a box. I bought a cable box on the street the same one I have - for $30. After connecting to a cable it says "call operator" - so I called. They told me that they will not support this box - I have to buy a box from them for a price of $10/month. The building I am living does not allow satellite dishes - so I am stuck. Here is the fax I am sending to my representative - if you are stuck with cable as me, please to the same: To representative? I am a Time Warner Cable subscriber. I want to add cable service for a new television that I just purchased. Time Warner Cable wants me to pay $10 per month for another box. I just bought the same box that Time Warner uses for $30. Time Warner refuses to recognize this box even though it is in perfect condition. I live in New York City and there is no competition for Time Warner. I live in a building where management does not allow us to have a Satelite Dish. Please pass a law that allows consumers to purchase equipment from someone other than a company that has a monopoly on a service. I plan to start a campaign on the internet about this problem and I will publish your response - or lack of - on the internet. An Angry Citizen I sent it to: Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton New York City 780 Third Ave, Suite 2601 New York, NY 10017 Phone: (212) 688-6262 Fax: (212) 688-7444 Senator Charles E. "Chuck" Schumer New York City 757 Third Avenue, Suite 17-02 New York, NY 10017 Phone: 212-486-4430 Fax: 212-486-7693 Representative Gary L. Ackerman (D - 05) Phone: 202-225-2601 fax: 202-225-1589 http://www.house.gov/ackerman/pages/contact.html District Office: 218-14 Northern Boulevard Bayside, NY 11361-3580 Voice: 718-423-2154 FAX: 718-423-5053 Representative Anthony Weiner (D - 09) Phone: 202-225-6616 fax: 202-226-7253 Email: #1). If the product offered is unacceptable, don't buy it ..... shop around for something better. Thank you for explaining me that I don't have to buy a product that I don't like. It is totally new and exciting idea to me. I never thought about it. You must be a genius! It is too bad you answered without reading first my post - I stated there that I shopped for other way to get signal to my TV - my only option is Time Warner cable. #2.) I doubt that I could convince chevrolet to put "fins" back on their cars. If I REALLY want fins on my car, I'd have to buy an old one. Likewise, I doubt that you can dictate to TW what they MUST do with their product. They pay for it and it's theirs to distribute as they please at whatever price they like. If that's unacceptable, refer to # 1). or #3). Well Mr. Genius, I want to convince a corporation to send me the same signal it is sending me to 2 other cables boxes I own. I want to buy a cable box from other, cheaper source. As a consumer - I think I have a right to do it. Do you think otherwise? #3). Have you considered relocating to a single residence building where you can get satellite or whatever you please instead of beating your head against the beaurocratic (sp?) wall? I've never heard of such an issue in rural America. No, I didn't, but with the same way of thinking you could make huge carear in a communist country. I love NYC, I want to live here and I want choice of purchasing equipment for my TV. Do you see any problem with this? #4). Define "rights". Many sons and daughters of America have served / died defending our "right" to be free, but I personally have never heard of any of them doing that for the "right" to be able to watch tv any damn way one pleases. Mr. Genius - as want to have a right to have a CHOICE to CHOOSE services - that all. I am asking too much? #5). Does the phrase "caveat emptor" mean anything to you? I am talking not about warranty - I am talking about not having choice to purchase the best/cheapest equipment. No doubt some-one somewhere will feel that I'm full of crap for what I just said, but the feeling is reciprocated. :-) I don't think you are full of crap - I suspect you are paid employee of a cable company that tries the best to protect a company profit. But if I am wrong, if there are much more people like you that think that the only protection American consumer have it to move to rural America - this country is lost. Zalek |
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
|
David Moran wrote: "Dr. Personality" wrote in message [...] No, it's not. No one is forcing you to get cable. By getting cable through ABC cable company, you're basically saying "I accept the price that I'm being charged". If you don't like the price, don't get it. My point is: in NYC in appartment building (and there are thousands New Yorkers like me) we have no other choice - Time Warner only. And this is the reason I want to involve politicians (I didn't hear for any of them). [...] It was stated that it was stolen earlier in the thread. Dave I have no idea is the box is stolen. I bought this box on ebay and Time Warner can check it and to file a complain. I am not planning to hide seller information. Nobody from Time Warner aked me for a cable box serial number. After my complain Time Warner called me, I asked for official answer of Time Warner - I sent them email, but got answer that the person that is taken care of my case took vacation. I'll wait. Zalek |
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed wrote: [...] The OP wants to whine because TWC won't activate his illegally gotten box. He'd actually have something valid to say if he were angry at the individual who sold it to him. It was obviously misrepresented by the seller. Hell, I'd be turning the seller in to the cops just for ****ing me off, never mind the money I was out. If someone sold you a car and you found out after the fact that the title was forged and the car was stolen, don't you think you'd be telling the cops about it instead of getting ****ed because "your car" had been towed, processed and returned to the owner? Clarification - I purchased this box LEGALLY. There is no law (yet...) that forbids selling or buyiny cable boxes. If this box is stolen, the owner should complain. Meantime, Time Warner have all information about this box and is not complaining that box is stolen, Time Warner is complaining that I don't want to buy exactly the same box for a price of $10/month. Zalek |
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
|
zalek wrote:
Well Mr. Genius, I want to convince a corporation to send me the same signal it is sending me to 2 other cables boxes I own. I want to buy a cable box from other, cheaper source. As a consumer - I think I have a right to do it. Do you think otherwise? I agree with you. I bought a vacuum that "fell off the truck" for a real good price. Much less than I would have paid at Sears. Only problem was the vacuum didn't work. I had the damnded time trying to return it to Sears. I also had a similar problem at Yankees Stadium. The tickets are so expensive. So I bought a new set of crayons and printed one up for myself. Would you believe they did not let me into the game? The nerve. The utter nerve. |
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
David Moran wrote: [...] As I've said all along. If you don't want to pay the price, don't get cable. That's essentially saying "I want cable, but I don't want to pay the price, though I pay it anyway". I have cable because I want it and I can afford it; I don't NEED it. If I woke up tomorrow and found out I had a sudden drop in income, cable would be the first to go. That's a good $90 back in my pocket each month. Yes, I said $90; I have digital cable, the premium channels, and the DVR. My internet and phone would be the last to go because I use them for work and other things that I need to do. I could always use the internet from school, but it is MUCH more convenient to have internet here at home. Dave Dave, I appreciate your crappy work of defending cable companies, they don't deserve more. I don't give a damm about a cable or satelite - I want TV channels I like. As I explained - in NYC I have no choice - the only supplier of TV channels like CNN or Discovery is Time Warner - and Time Warner charges me on top of service I pay - $10/month for each TV. Time Warner even does not allow me to buy a cable box from other sources. I want this admition in writing and to send it to FCC and politicians that suppose to represent NY consumers. I think that as a consumer I have a right to fight this irp-off - I am sure that after work hours - you will agree me. Zalek |
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
|
zalek wrote:
Ed wrote: [...] The OP wants to whine because TWC won't activate his illegally gotten box. He'd actually have something valid to say if he were angry at the individual who sold it to him. It was obviously misrepresented by the seller. Hell, I'd be turning the seller in to the cops just for ****ing me off, never mind the money I was out. If someone sold you a car and you found out after the fact that the title was forged and the car was stolen, don't you think you'd be telling the cops about it instead of getting ****ed because "your car" had been towed, processed and returned to the owner? Clarification - I purchased this box LEGALLY. There is no law (yet...) that forbids selling or buyiny cable boxes. If this box is stolen, the owner should complain. Meantime, Time Warner have all information about this box and is not complaining that box is stolen, Time Warner is complaining that I don't want to buy exactly the same box for a price of $10/month. Zalek You may believe you purchased the box legally, but if it was the property of TWC, you did not. There is a law that forbids selling something which you do not own. It would apply equally to cable boxes as well as cars, boats, televisions and chewing gum. By the way, check the fine print... you can NOT "buy" a box from Time Warner for $10/month. You can lease one for that price. You can not "buy" the box from Time Warner at all. |
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
|
Joe Collins wrote: zalek wrote: Well Mr. Genius, I want to convince a corporation to send me the same signal it is sending me to 2 other cables boxes I own. I want to buy a cable box from other, cheaper source. As a consumer - I think I have a right to do it. Do you think otherwise? I agree with you. I bought a vacuum that "fell off the truck" for a real good price. Much less than I would have paid at Sears. Only problem was the vacuum didn't work. I had the damnded time trying to return it to Sears. I also had a similar problem at Yankees Stadium. The tickets are so expensive. So I bought a new set of crayons and printed one up for myself. Would you believe they did not let me into the game? The nerve. The utter nerve. You are trying to be more religious than a Pope. Time Warner told me that the reason they don't want to send me a signal is not because the box I bought is stolen or dameged - the reason is because I DIDN'T BUY IT FROM THEM. Now do you understand? Zalek |
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed wrote: zalek wrote: Ed wrote: [...] The OP wants to whine because TWC won't activate his illegally gotten box. He'd actually have something valid to say if he were angry at the individual who sold it to him. It was obviously misrepresented by the seller. Hell, I'd be turning the seller in to the cops just for ****ing me off, never mind the money I was out. If someone sold you a car and you found out after the fact that the title was forged and the car was stolen, don't you think you'd be telling the cops about it instead of getting ****ed because "your car" had been towed, processed and returned to the owner? Clarification - I purchased this box LEGALLY. There is no law (yet...) that forbids selling or buyiny cable boxes. If this box is stolen, the owner should complain. Meantime, Time Warner have all information about this box and is not complaining that box is stolen, Time Warner is complaining that I don't want to buy exactly the same box for a price of $10/month. Zalek You may believe you purchased the box legally, but if it was the property of TWC, you did not. There is a law that forbids selling something which you do not own. It would apply equally to cable boxes as well as cars, boats, televisions and chewing gum. Ed, I bought this box LEGALLY and as long as the owner of the box is not complaining, let's not argue about it. Let's talk about the real issue. Does a coporation have the right to create de facto a monopoly and force consumers to buy equipment from them only? By the way, check the fine print... you can NOT "buy" a box from Time Warner for $10/month. You can lease one for that price. You can not "buy" the box from Time Warner at all. I don't care how you call this rip-off - lease or purchase, the only thing I want to prevent is consumer rip-off, it does not matter whether it is called lease or purchase. Zalek |
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Elmo
P. Shagnasty wrote: In article , "Dr. Personality" wrote: Reproduce the quote where I said anything about me being "owed" cable TV, or **** off. Everything you say screams that. Any rational person sees it--which explains why you don't see it. In other words, you can't produce such a quote, because it doesn't exist. Time for you to **** off now. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Time Warner DVR VS TIVO - When Cable is Out | Bob Brown | Tivo personal television | 0 | October 18th 06 04:07 AM |
| ESPN HD Comes to Time Warner Cable in Raleigh-Durham NC | AJG | High definition TV | 4 | September 16th 04 08:20 PM |
| TIVO VS Time Warner DVR | Robert Brown | Tivo personal television | 4 | September 6th 04 09:18 AM |
| TIVO VS Time Warner DVR | Robert Brown | Tivo personal television | 0 | September 5th 04 09:20 PM |
| Newbie Question: TIVO with Time Warner Cable | Dr. Bob Lade | Tivo personal television | 0 | February 22nd 04 11:50 AM |