![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's a site that shows daily-updated stats on how the three main
types of High-def TVs (DLP, Plasma, LCD) are doing in the marketplace (based on Amazon.com sales.) Also shows top selling TVs in each category. http://www.eproductwars.com/tv/ Question - to what degree do sales statistics for this type of thing help inform a buying decision. I can see how this would work for Blu-ray vs. HD DVD, but not sure if it matters much for HD TVs... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sales reflect marketing rather than consumer understanding of technologies.
The informed consumer would understand that 1080p may be technically better but for most viewing conditions is indistinguishable from 720p. The informed consumer would understand that for practical viewing conditions HD and blu-ray are indistinguishable from current DVD technology upconverted via HDMI connections. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"bmoag" wrote:
The informed consumer would understand that for practical viewing conditions HD and blu-ray are indistinguishable from current DVD technology upconverted via HDMI connections. Has this been confirmed by any A-B test comparisons between upconverted regular DVDs and the same titled newer HD discs (both HD DVD and Blu-ray)? I would think that the difference in resolution and overall definition between an upconverted regular DVD and the same titled HD version is apparent due to the greater amount of information stored and played back on the HD version of the disc. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
BDK wrote:
In article , says... Sales reflect marketing rather than consumer understanding of technologies. The informed consumer would understand that 1080p may be technically better but for most viewing conditions is indistinguishable from 720p. The informed consumer would understand that for practical viewing conditions HD and blu-ray are indistinguishable from current DVD technology upconverted via HDMI connections. Get your eyes checked. I've seen them both, one after the other on a 1080P LCD. Not even close. I've compared them as well, and I agree that there is a substantial improvement in 1080p over 720p. But the argument above says that in most viewing situations the difference is insignificant, and to a large extent that's true. If you're viewing, say, a 50" or smaller screen from 10 feet or more away in a brightly lit room, it will be very difficult to tell them apart. And that's especially true for those of us with imperfect vision. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"bmoag" wrote in message ... Sales reflect marketing rather than consumer understanding of technologies. The informed consumer would understand that 1080p may be technically better but for most viewing conditions is indistinguishable from 720p. The informed consumer would understand that for practical viewing conditions HD and blu-ray are indistinguishable from current DVD technology upconverted via HDMI connections. depends on the movie. King Kong: HD-DVD DVD Apollo XIII: HD-DVD ~ DVD MI:III: HD-DVD DVD using Microsoft HD-DVD add-on for HD-DVD and Oppo 971 for DVD, sitting about 6 feet from a 44" 720p dlp. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"khee mao" wrote in message depends on the movie. King Kong: HD-DVD DVD Apollo XIII: HD-DVD ~ DVD MI:III: HD-DVD DVD using Microsoft HD-DVD add-on for HD-DVD and Oppo 971 for DVD, sitting about 6 feet from a 44" 720p dlp. I sit about 9 feet from a 60" 1080i using a similar setup and agree |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Gilliland:
But the argument above says that in most viewing situations the difference is insignificant, and to a large extent that's true. If you're viewing, say, a 50" or smaller screen from 10 feet or more away in a brightly lit room, it will be very difficult to tell them apart. And that's especially true for those of us with imperfect vision. I think the real problem is the garbage being broadcast as being HD when in fact it isn't. The HD channels I get from DISH rarely show actual HD content, at best it usually looks like overcompressed and maybe upsampled DVD. Local OTA HD is where it's at if you want to really see what 1080 looks like. Worse yet is the crap they demo at Best Buy. Even the Blue-ray set-ups are grainy and show artifacts... crap. -- Mac Cool |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Plasma vs. LCD: Plasma will lose" sez biz exp | Simon Slavin | UK digital tv | 3 | August 21st 06 08:15 PM |
| Any LCDs with response time up to par with plasma? | ToMh | High definition TV | 11 | June 17th 06 01:08 AM |
| Plasma panel collapse coming soon? | Randy Sweeney | High definition TV | 64 | January 3rd 05 11:05 PM |
| Newbie plasma questions | Darryn Warner | UK home cinema | 1 | November 21st 03 05:20 PM |
| Comparing RPTV and Plasma display brightness | Vidguy7 | High definition TV | 2 | July 13th 03 06:31 AM |