![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alan F:
Wikipedia: enter the station call letters Nice tip. No wonder I can't get WRDC digital, they are only broadcasting at 9.1 kW. I'm confused about some stations that have two entries under Digital, usually one listing at a low broadcasting strength and the other at a much higher strength. What's the story on that? e.g. WRAY http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?call=WRAY -- Mac Cool |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mac Cool wrote:
Alan F: Wikipedia: enter the station call letters Nice tip. No wonder I can't get WRDC digital, they are only broadcasting at 9.1 kW. I'm confused about some stations that have two entries under Digital, usually one listing at a low broadcasting strength and the other at a much higher strength. What's the story on that? e.g. WRAY http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?call=WRAY If there are 2 entries for the digital channel, the station has been operating under the low STA (Special Temporary Authority) power level with an antenna that is often at a low height. The 2nd entry is a construction permit or license to go full power when they are ready. All "primary" broadcast stations (around 1800 across the US, IIRC) were supposed to go full power on their digital signal this past summer by July 1, 2006 UNLESS the station was granted a waiver or had a pending construction permit on upgrading/building a broadcast tower. (As background, the top four stations (basically the big four networks) in the top 100 DMAs or markets were required to go full digital power by July 1, 2005 although again waivers were granted.) So some digital stations went full power back in June and early July. But those working under construction permits were able to use it to drag out the process a few months. AFAIK, there has been a steady stream this year of stations putting up new antennas and/or installing new transmitter gear and then going full power on the digital signal. But the STA entry is still carried in the database for those stations. The STA entry will probably be deleted eventually. Also, the FCC has apparently granted a lot of waivers, so there are many stations in the smaller markets who still have not gone full power on their digital signal. I have not seen a count of how many stations are still at STA power levels. In the case of WRDC-DT, the FCC database shows the STA power of 9.1 KW (which is not bad for STA for a UHF channel) and a construction permit. If you can't receive the station OTA, email or call them to ask if they are at full power and if not, when will they. Alan F |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Minami wrote:
Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? I live between two metropolitan areas that are about 60 degrees apart. Can I point one antenna to the north, and then use a splitter to add another antenna pointing south west? Then I'd run the one cable into my HD receiver. I've heard that analog signals may ghost because the two antennas are receiving the signal at different angles. But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Thanks! http://www.tvantenna.com/support/tut...combining.html I did the above. Works great! Make sure the leads from the antennas going into the splitter (diplexer) are the same length. My problem is that I am in the middle of a valley with TV towers visible from all directions. I mounted two antennas vertically in opposite directions on the same pole similar to the site below. I then went with a digital tuner and get perfect reception on all channels. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Philip wrote:
Richard Minami wrote: Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? I live between two metropolitan areas that are about 60 degrees apart. Can I point one antenna to the north, and then use a splitter to add another antenna pointing south west? Then I'd run the one cable into my HD receiver. I've heard that analog signals may ghost because the two antennas are receiving the signal at different angles. But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Thanks! http://www.tvantenna.com/support/tut...combining.html I did the above. Works great! Make sure the leads from the antennas going into the splitter (diplexer) are the same length. My problem is that I am in the middle of a valley with TV towers visible from all directions. I mounted two antennas vertically in opposite directions on the same pole similar to the site below. I then went with a digital tuner and get perfect reception on all channels. Great for you. I think that equal length thing only applies when the antennas point the same direction to maintain phasing so the vertical beam angle stays parallel with the booms. It certainly won't hurt to have same length but I'm pretty sure it's unimportant when pointing in different directions. GG |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:10:55 -0800, "Richard Minami"
wrote: Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? I live between two metropolitan areas that are about 60 degrees apart. Can I point one antenna to the north, and then use a splitter to add another antenna pointing south west? Then I'd run the one cable into my HD receiver. I've heard that analog signals may ghost because the two antennas are receiving the signal at different angles. But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Thanks! I'm doing it and it's working fine. However, although they claim no ghosting because we don't see the ghosts it's still a problem but does not manifest itself in the same manner. Signals interfere be they analog or digital. With two antennas you are likely to be receiving the same station with the signal to one antenna a bit delayed from the other. What I have found is that digital is not always a there or not there thing. If you've ever seen a digital satellite signal fail due to rain or snow the image may pixilate, it may break up into blocks, and it may start pausing and then continuing. *Usually* the signal will eventually fail. Also I have one station that I receive great with one antenna. With both hooked up there isn't a sign of it. IF you can do it you are better off with an A/B switch so you can select the antennas for the best signal. If you do your station scan with both antennas and find another station only on one, you can add it manually. Some where (under the pile of parts) I have an electronic A/B switch and would like to try that but having looked at the innards I'm not at all impressed with it. Looks nice outside, junk inside. Unless stations are close I've not found an omni directional antenna that works well although I do have a crossed dipole at 30 feet over my shop that does well out to 30 or 40 miles, give or take. The two antennas are closer to 90 feet and picking up stations out to about 100 miles. Works for me, but I can only speak for my installation at my location. It's not a case of YMMV, it's more than likely your mileage *will* vary. :-)) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Roger wrote: IF you can do it you are better off with an A/B switch so you can select the antennas for the best signal. If you are going to do this you may as well use a rotor. I put in two antennae with a joiner (that costs 3db) because I wanted to be able to get all the stations on my HD Tivo. In Pittsburgh, Ch 4-1 is about 100 degrees away from all the other stations at my location. Consequently, I could either program 4-1 or everything else. With two antennae I get everything. However, there is occasional break-up (pixilation) from weather and other things beyond my control. I think this has more to do with individual stations being able to put out a strong signal than anything else. -- Robert B. Peirce, Venetia, PA 724-941-6883 bob AT peirce-family.com [Mac] rbp AT cooksonpeirce.com [Office] |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robert Peirce wrote:
In article , Roger wrote: IF you can do it you are better off with an A/B switch so you can select the antennas for the best signal. If you are going to do this you may as well use a rotor. I put in two antennae with a joiner (that costs 3db) because I wanted to be able to get all the stations on my HD Tivo. In Pittsburgh, Ch 4-1 is about 100 degrees away from all the other stations at my location. Consequently, I could either program 4-1 or everything else. With two antennae I get everything. However, there is occasional break-up (pixilation) from weather and other things beyond my control. I think this has more to do with individual stations being able to put out a strong signal than anything else. An issue with a rotator is a second TV or recorder can't use the stations not currently aimed at. Also, the rotator cost isn't much different for another antenna. GG |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article om,
"G-squared" wrote: Robert Peirce wrote: In article , Roger wrote: IF you can do it you are better off with an A/B switch so you can select the antennas for the best signal. If you are going to do this you may as well use a rotor. An issue with a rotator is a second TV or recorder can't use the stations not currently aimed at. Also, the rotator cost isn't much different for another antenna. Why not spend a few bucks and get a device to join the two antennae signals? That's what I did and it works fine. There is a 3db loss in the joiner, but I still get great signal strength and I can program my Tivo for any station I want. -- Robert B. Peirce, Venetia, PA 724-941-6883 bob AT peirce-family.com [Mac] rbp AT cooksonpeirce.com [Office] |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you have a URL for such a device? Thanks!
Richard "Robert Peirce" wrote in message ... In article om, "G-squared" wrote: Robert Peirce wrote: In article , Roger wrote: IF you can do it you are better off with an A/B switch so you can select the antennas for the best signal. If you are going to do this you may as well use a rotor. An issue with a rotator is a second TV or recorder can't use the stations not currently aimed at. Also, the rotator cost isn't much different for another antenna. Why not spend a few bucks and get a device to join the two antennae signals? That's what I did and it works fine. There is a 3db loss in the joiner, but I still get great signal strength and I can program my Tivo for any station I want. -- Robert B. Peirce, Venetia, PA 724-941-6883 bob AT peirce-family.com [Mac] rbp AT cooksonpeirce.com [Office] |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Minami wrote:
Do you have a URL for such a device? Thanks! Richard "Robert Peirce" wrote in message ... In article om, "G-squared" wrote: Robert Peirce wrote: In article , Roger wrote: IF you can do it you are better off with an A/B switch so you can select the antennas for the best signal. If you are going to do this you may as well use a rotor. An issue with a rotator is a second TV or recorder can't use the stations not currently aimed at. Also, the rotator cost isn't much different for another antenna. Why not spend a few bucks and get a device to join the two antennae signals? That's what I did and it works fine. There is a 3db loss in the joiner, but I still get great signal strength and I can program my Tivo for any station I want. -- Robert B. Peirce, Venetia, PA 724-941-6883 bob AT peirce-family.com [Mac] rbp AT cooksonpeirce.com [Office] ChannelMaster Jointenna: http://www.warrenelectronics.com/Antennas/joiners.htm |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | July 14th 04 06:20 AM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | June 28th 04 08:44 PM |
| Terk tv44 vs Terk tv55 antenna ? | Apothecon | High definition TV | 4 | May 21st 04 02:54 PM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | May 4th 04 03:01 PM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | April 18th 04 02:55 PM |