![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is 28 AWG too thin for a 10' HDMI Cable?
Is there a real world (as opposed to theoretical) benefit to having gold plated connectors? What is a net jacket? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:09:33 -0600, Bob Simon
wrote: Is 28 AWG too thin for a 10' HDMI Cable? Is there a real world (as opposed to theoretical) benefit to having gold plated connectors? What is a net jacket? I ordered the following cable from MonoPrice: HDMI Cable male to male 28AWG - 10ft w/Ferrite Cores (Gold-Plated) $7.10 I hope I won't be sorry ordering a 28 AWG cable before hearing back from you guys. Also, since I'm getting a cable with ferrite cores, what do they do? Is it ever a good idea to remove them? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gold: The basic rule is don't mix metals. If your inputs and outputs are
gold then stick with gold; if they are not gold but your cable is you can develop connection problems over time. Ferrite cores are not needed on a digital interconnect; silly really. 28 AWG is fine if the length is kept to about 3 meters, perhaps 5 meters. Richard. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard" wrote in message ... Gold: The basic rule is don't mix metals. If your inputs and outputs are gold then stick with gold; if they are not gold but your cable is you can develop connection problems over time. Ferrite cores are not needed on a digital interconnect; silly really. 28 AWG is fine if the length is kept to about 3 meters, perhaps 5 meters. Richard. While I agree that mixing metals is best avaoided, Gold is very stable and I have never seen, in three decades of installation and service work, a problem due to mixing gold and other connectors. Ferrite cores are intended to insert a common mode impedance in the wire. They can be useful in some cases that can disprupt signal transmission but are usually irrelevant. They can be equally useful in digital cables and analog cables. A digital transmission actually looks like RF and behaves as an analog signal does in a cable. Just because it is digital does not mean that noise cannot disrupt the transmission. Wire gauge seems to make little difference in HDMI cables, even with length. Shielding is much more critical at longer lengths. Leonard -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 22053 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard wrote:
Gold: The basic rule is don't mix metals. If your inputs and outputs are gold then stick with gold; if they are not gold but your cable is you can develop connection problems over time. MYTH !!!! There is absolutely no basis (chemical or electrical) for this argument, other than, perhaps, reports about memory modules that would cause trouble if mixed --- but it was not really the fact of connecting gold to non-gold; it was simply that there was a standard in which gold connectors meant a particular type of module, and the tin ones were a different type; it was mixing the different *types of memory* what caused the problem, not the fact of connecting something that is gold-plated to a non- gold-plated. Carlos -- |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Simon wrote:
Is there a real world (as opposed to theoretical) benefit to having gold plated connectors? Why would you talk about a "theoreticl benefit"? (as if it was undebatable) --- any claimed "theoretical" benefit of gold-plated connectors is most likely snake oil... (I'm sure they claim that the signal is more "pure" because you're using a metal that is intrinsicly "pure" and blaaah blah blaaahhhh...) The *real* (both practical and theoretical) benefit of gold-plated connectors is that it does not develop rust (or an oxide surface) over time --- the oxide surface compromises the ability to transmit the signal, since it compromises the conductivity of the surface. Carlos -- |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Carlos Moreno" wrote in message ... Richard wrote: Gold: The basic rule is don't mix metals. If your inputs and outputs are gold then stick with gold; if they are not gold but your cable is you can develop connection problems over time. MYTH !!!! There is absolutely no basis (chemical or electrical) for this argument, other than, perhaps, reports about memory modules that would cause trouble if mixed --- but it was not really the fact of connecting gold to non-gold; it was simply that there was a standard in which gold connectors meant a particular type of module, and the tin ones were a different type; it was mixing the different *types of memory* what caused the problem, not the fact of connecting something that is gold-plated to a non- gold-plated. My understanding was that the gold plating behaves in a more cathodic manner than tin or nickel platings and causes them to corrode. In high frequency or low signal level conditions this can be a problem. Even in the high humidity of Louisiana and Florida, however, in practice I have not seen it to be an issue in A/V systems. Leonard -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 22079 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now! |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know that computer memory chips manufacturers are very fussy that the pin
metal is the same as the chip socket metal. electrolysis perchance? -- All the Best, Richard Harison "Leonard Caillouet" wrote in message ... "Carlos Moreno" wrote in message ... Richard wrote: Gold: The basic rule is don't mix metals. If your inputs and outputs are gold then stick with gold; if they are not gold but your cable is you can develop connection problems over time. MYTH !!!! There is absolutely no basis (chemical or electrical) for this argument, other than, perhaps, reports about memory modules that would cause trouble if mixed --- but it was not really the fact of connecting gold to non-gold; it was simply that there was a standard in which gold connectors meant a particular type of module, and the tin ones were a different type; it was mixing the different *types of memory* what caused the problem, not the fact of connecting something that is gold-plated to a non- gold-plated. My understanding was that the gold plating behaves in a more cathodic manner than tin or nickel platings and causes them to corrode. In high frequency or low signal level conditions this can be a problem. Even in the high humidity of Louisiana and Florida, however, in practice I have not seen it to be an issue in A/V systems. Leonard -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 22079 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now! ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:14:21 -0500, Carlos Moreno
wrote: Bob Simon wrote: Is there a real world (as opposed to theoretical) benefit to having gold plated connectors? Why would you talk about a "theoreticl benefit"? (as if it was undebatable) --- any claimed "theoretical" benefit of gold-plated connectors is most likely snake oil... (I'm sure they claim that the signal is more "pure" because you're using a metal that is intrinsicly "pure" and blaaah blah blaaahhhh...) A theoretical benefit is one that is too insignificant to be of practical value but is nevertheless interesting because it explains how things work. The *real* (both practical and theoretical) benefit of gold-plated connectors is that it does not develop rust (or an oxide surface) over time --- the oxide surface compromises the ability to transmit the signal, since it compromises the conductivity of the surface. Carlos |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob Simon" wrote in message
... On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:09:33 -0600, Bob Simon wrote: Is 28 AWG too thin for a 10' HDMI Cable? Is there a real world (as opposed to theoretical) benefit to having gold plated connectors? What is a net jacket? I ordered the following cable from MonoPrice: HDMI Cable male to male 28AWG - 10ft w/Ferrite Cores (Gold-Plated) $7.10 I hope I won't be sorry ordering a 28 AWG cable before hearing back from you guys. Also, since I'm getting a cable with ferrite cores, what do they do? Is it ever a good idea to remove them? Bob, have you priced these types of cables at stores like Best Buy? Here's one: http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....5&type=product Monoprice [AKA eHDMI] has very nice quality cables at hard-to-believe prices. Go for it! |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HDMI Cable Suggestion | [email protected] | High definition TV | 8 | November 7th 06 05:48 AM |
| Plasma newbie help -- thanks in advance | [email protected] | High definition TV | 6 | October 25th 06 05:17 AM |
| HDMI cable: 28AWG? 24AWG? What do these mean? | Adam Corolla | High definition TV | 16 | June 28th 06 01:42 AM |
| HDMI cable BS | cheers | High definition TV | 9 | April 5th 06 01:58 AM |
| HDMI selector switch? Comments on hooking up HD DVR / Cable box | MAG | Home theater (general) | 4 | October 8th 05 09:24 PM |