![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? I
live between two metropolitan areas that are about 60 degrees apart. Can I point one antenna to the north, and then use a splitter to add another antenna pointing south west? Then I'd run the one cable into my HD receiver. I've heard that analog signals may ghost because the two antennas are receiving the signal at different angles. But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Thanks! -- Richard |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Minami:
Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? Can't you just use an omni-directional antenna or a rotor? But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Digital broadcasts do not ghost. You either get them or you don't because the receiver cuts out when the signal strength is below a certain threshold (somewhere around 80%). -- Mac Cool |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mac Cool wrote:
Richard Minami: Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? Can't you just use an omni-directional antenna or a rotor? But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Digital broadcasts do not ghost. You either get them or you don't because the receiver cuts out when the signal strength is below a certain threshold (somewhere around 80%). -- Mac Cool You're most certainly mistaken on this one. Digital most certainly is sensitive to multipath (ghosts) though it does not show up as a second image displaced from the main signal. The delay equalizer in the receiver can process much of the multipath out but not always. When it gets beyond the range of the processing, it will fail regardless of signal strength. BTW I've had good reception with very low strength (50%) - measured at 12dB above the noise floor of a Tektronix 2712 spectrum analyzer. (ok, it's cheating). The original question is about multiple antennas. I'm sure it _can_ be done but may require some channel selecting filters and/or directional couplers to avoid re-transmitting the signal from the north back out the south. GG |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
G-squared:
You're most certainly mistaken on this one. Digital most certainly is sensitive to multipath (ghosts) though it does not show up as a second image displaced from the main signal. Wait, you are agreeing with me and claiming I'm mistaken at the same time? I don't think the guy cares what is going inside the receiver, he wants to know if the picture will ghost even though he said 'signal' instead of picture. -- Mac Cool |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Minami" wrote in message ... Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? I live between two metropolitan areas that are about 60 degrees apart. Can I point one antenna to the north, and then use a splitter to add another antenna pointing south west? Then I'd run the one cable into my HD receiver. I've heard that analog signals may ghost because the two antennas are receiving the signal at different angles. But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Thanks! -- Richard You will have ghosting problems called multipath. You probably need to have filters or traps installed. I solved this problem by having two separate paths each with it's own antenna and preamp then inside I trap the signal from the antenna not pointing at the channel you want to receive. Depending on your channels you can band trap if for instance one direction has UHF channels and the other only VHF channels. Two 8db traps in one package costs $28.00. You will need one of those for each channel you receive. As a general rule of thumb you need to have 10 db of clean signal riding on top of the noise, multipath or cochannel interference. Best reception is with VERY directional antennas. Not only do you get better signal levels (more gain) but you have less multipath from multiple antennas. Worst gain but free from most multi path is a omni directional antenna. These are selling at Radio Shack for $70. Consider the cost of traps and filters can easily run to $300 and it might pay for simple omni on a tall tower (trade cost of traps for extra height). |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Minami wrote:
Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? I live between two metropolitan areas that are about 60 degrees apart. Can I point one antenna to the north, and then use a splitter to add another antenna pointing south west? Then I'd run the one cable into my HD receiver. I've heard that analog signals may ghost because the two antennas are receiving the signal at different angles. But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Thanks! Combining 2 antennas is usually a tricky project getting 2 directional antennas aligned just right or a complicated & expensive project involving jointenna filters. Depending on the distance to the two sets of broadcast towers, you may be able to use a single antenna which is a heck of a lot easier and cheaper. Or just live with the hassle of a rotator. Or 2 antenna lines running down to the receiver with a remote controlled A/B switch (real pain with digital receivers and channel scans). For example, I live in Northern Virginia and have a Channel Master 4221 4 Bay Bowtie UHF antenna in my attic. The CM 4221 is a very good mid-range UHF antenna with a broad pickup towards the front and to the backside as well. With the CM 4221 aimed at Baltimore, I can get the Baltimore stations at around 43 miles at an azimuth of 63 degrees and the closer Washington stations at around 16 miles clumped around 113 degrees in azimuth. That is a 50+ degree spread between the 2 cities. I also have added a Channel Master 7777 pre-amp to make up for the cable run and local building obstructions of the top of houses up a slight hill between my antenna and Baltimore. I also get 5 other stations scattered around in azimuth. If you would post your zip code, we can look at your specific situation and see if maybe a single antenna will do the job. The keep it simple when possible approach applies to putting up antennas as well. Alan F |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for all the help! I'm in 98198. Oh, and I originally said ~60
degrees apart, but it should be ~120 degrees. (high school geometry was a long time ago...) I'm hoping the problem is my old antenna, with one of the longest conductors drooping. I have a new one in the garage (a little bit larger than the one I have now, boom length like 5" longer), but I haven't put it up yet. Snow around Seattle, probably not a safe time to be on the roof! I'm hoping the new antenna and a new coax cable will capture more HDTV OTA. Our current coax cable isn't shielded very well (I think that's how you'd say it). The copper core is good, then the white plastic cover is okay, then the foil like material is intact, but the next layer has like 4 wires, then the black rubbery outer cover. The cable I got from my Dad has more of a braided layer (instead of the 4-5 wires on our current cable). Is that shielding or more conductivity? I feel like it would be better conductivity. The tip is a screw on, instead of a crimp, and when I wiggle the connector, sometimes I can get NBC in HD, sometimes not. This is my weekend project, to put up the new antenna and pull the new coax (about 40-50 feet). NBC, ABC, CBS and a PBS station all broadcast from Seattle. But Fox, WB, and another PBS station broadcast from Tacoma. I'm hoping to get them all, since analog broadcasts are supposedly going away in a few years. Richard "Alan F" wrote in message news:[email protected] Richard Minami wrote: Hi! Does anyone know if I can run two roof top antennas concurrently? I live between two metropolitan areas that are about 60 degrees apart. Can I point one antenna to the north, and then use a splitter to add another antenna pointing south west? Then I'd run the one cable into my HD receiver. I've heard that analog signals may ghost because the two antennas are receiving the signal at different angles. But would a digital broadcast do the same thing? Thanks! Combining 2 antennas is usually a tricky project getting 2 directional antennas aligned just right or a complicated & expensive project involving jointenna filters. Depending on the distance to the two sets of broadcast towers, you may be able to use a single antenna which is a heck of a lot easier and cheaper. Or just live with the hassle of a rotator. Or 2 antenna lines running down to the receiver with a remote controlled A/B switch (real pain with digital receivers and channel scans). For example, I live in Northern Virginia and have a Channel Master 4221 4 Bay Bowtie UHF antenna in my attic. The CM 4221 is a very good mid-range UHF antenna with a broad pickup towards the front and to the backside as well. With the CM 4221 aimed at Baltimore, I can get the Baltimore stations at around 43 miles at an azimuth of 63 degrees and the closer Washington stations at around 16 miles clumped around 113 degrees in azimuth. That is a 50+ degree spread between the 2 cities. I also have added a Channel Master 7777 pre-amp to make up for the cable run and local building obstructions of the top of houses up a slight hill between my antenna and Baltimore. I also get 5 other stations scattered around in azimuth. If you would post your zip code, we can look at your specific situation and see if maybe a single antenna will do the job. The keep it simple when possible approach applies to putting up antennas as well. Alan F |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mac Cool wrote:
G-squared: You're most certainly mistaken on this one. Digital most certainly is sensitive to multipath (ghosts) though it does not show up as a second image displaced from the main signal. Wait, you are agreeing with me and claiming I'm mistaken at the same time? I don't think the guy cares what is going inside the receiver, he wants to know if the picture will ghost even though he said 'signal' instead of picture. -- Mac Cool Actually, that IS what I'm saying. The 'mechanism' that causes the ghosts is reflections adding to the main signal. You said that 'ghosts' are not a problem but they are. As long as the signal can be equalized (ghosts removed), the picture will be good but even if the signal is plenty strong, enough 'ghost' will make it unusable. Bottom line is an antenna with decent directivity aimed in the right direction will make all the difference. GG |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
The best solution would simply be run separate coax from each antenna
and a mechanical or electronic switch near the TV. Some TVs have more than one RF input, which would eliminate the need for a switch. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | July 14th 04 06:20 AM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | June 28th 04 08:44 PM |
| Terk tv44 vs Terk tv55 antenna ? | Apothecon | High definition TV | 4 | May 21st 04 02:54 PM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | May 4th 04 03:01 PM |
| r.v.s.tvro FAQ -- Contents | TVRO Hobbyists | Satellite tvro | 10 | April 18th 04 02:55 PM |