![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I recently moved to Austin TX from LA ( where I got great OTA HD. Here
( in Lakeway) I have spent a year screwing with the OTA HD. I went from TERK 55 ( no good) ..to now , a 50 Element Channel Master which is giving me worse reception than the Radio shack 30 Element I just replaced. Particulaly KXAN 36 NBC. Got it before ...now can't recognize it. I Have 3 HDTV's.. some get some channels that others don't...Off the SAME antenna??? Also I get these numbered channels recognized on my scan that don't give me a picture ie 19,27 etc. Is it possible to have TOO powerful of an antenna? I can't believe a bigger antenna does't get a better picture than a smaller one I had. I used to sell video tape equip. and installed cable for a while in my younger years..so I'm pretty versed in these maters...but this is driving me crazy. any suggestions would be appreciated. Fuzzy in Austin |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
baldguy96 wrote:
I recently moved to Austin TX from LA ( where I got great OTA HD. Here ( in Lakeway) I have spent a year screwing with the OTA HD. I went from TERK 55 ( no good) ..to now , a 50 Element Channel Master which is giving me worse reception than the Radio shack 30 Element I just replaced. Particulaly KXAN 36 NBC. Got it before ...now can't recognize it. I Have 3 HDTV's.. some get some channels that others don't...Off the SAME antenna??? Also I get these numbered channels recognized on my scan that don't give me a picture ie 19,27 etc. Is it possible to have TOO powerful of an antenna? I can't believe a bigger antenna does't get a better picture than a smaller one I had. I used to sell video tape equip. and installed cable for a while in my younger years..so I'm pretty versed in these maters...but this is driving me crazy. any suggestions would be appreciated. Fuzzy in Austin Have you tried: www.antennaweb.org Plug in your zip code or even better your actual address. You will see where the transmitters are in relation to your home. It looks like there two VHF stations KAKW-DT Killeen / JCWX-DT Fredericksburg and the rest are UHF stations. See the "street level' map and you'll see the direction you should point your antenna for the Austin towers. I've found that proper aiming is critical. Again... you need a good UHF antenna to pick up the Austin stations. Some DT tuners are better than others. My tuner picks up a few weak stations when scanning but those weak stations will not display. I just ignore them. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:40:47 -0800, baldguy96 wrote:
I recently moved to Austin TX from LA ( where I got great OTA HD. Here ( in Lakeway) I have spent a year screwing with the OTA HD. I went from TERK 55 ( no good) ..to now , a 50 Element Channel Master which is giving me worse reception than the Radio shack 30 Element I just replaced. Particulaly KXAN 36 NBC. Got it before ...now can't recognize it. I Have 3 HDTV's.. some get some channels that others don't...Off the SAME antenna??? Also I get these numbered channels recognized on my scan that don't give me a picture ie 19,27 etc. Is it possible to have TOO powerful of an antenna? I can't believe a bigger antenna does't get a better picture than a smaller one I had. I used to sell video tape equip. and installed cable for a while in my younger years..so I'm pretty versed in these maters...but this is driving me crazy. any suggestions would be appreciated. Fuzzy in Austin All the Austin stations are within 10 miles of you. All but one are UHF and the other is channel 13, which should be picked up ok with a UHF antenna. Your antenna should be pointed at 106 degrees for best reception of the Austin stations. You probably shouldn't be using a large antenna. The Houston stations are only about 100miles the other side of the Austin stations in the same direction. Too large of an antenna may cause interferences. I would think a small indoor/outdoor antenna should work well pointed in the right direction. With the trouble you're having you might want to inspect your cable connections. -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org http://mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html Usenet alt.video.ptv.mythtv My server http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php HD Tivo S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Two points.
A bigger antenna is (usually) MORE directional and more picky in pointing. You may need a rotor. A bigger antenna (should) mean more signals. ALL signals. Not only can your desired signals overload a digital TV tuner, but the rest (such as powerful FM stations) will desensitize your receiver. Attenuators are your new friends. In fact, most digital tuners are much more troubled by too much signal than too little. Digital is harder to troubleshoot without a spectrum analyzer because digital doesn't show you the problems like analog did. The quality of the analog channels can give a hint of problems, but I have seen flawless HD and unwatchable analog. In article .com, "baldguy96" wrote: I recently moved to Austin TX from LA ( where I got great OTA HD. Here ( in Lakeway) I have spent a year screwing with the OTA HD. I went from TERK 55 ( no good) ..to now , a 50 Element Channel Master which is giving me worse reception than the Radio shack 30 Element I just replaced. Particulaly KXAN 36 NBC. Got it before ...now can't recognize it. I Have 3 HDTV's.. some get some channels that others don't...Off the SAME antenna??? Also I get these numbered channels recognized on my scan that don't give me a picture ie 19,27 etc. Is it possible to have TOO powerful of an antenna? I can't believe a bigger antenna does't get a better picture than a smaller one I had. I used to sell video tape equip. and installed cable for a while in my younger years..so I'm pretty versed in these maters...but this is driving me crazy. any suggestions would be appreciated. Fuzzy in Austin |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
baldguy96 wrote:
I recently moved to Austin TX from LA ( where I got great OTA HD. Here ( in Lakeway) I have spent a year screwing with the OTA HD. I went from TERK 55 ( no good) ..to now , a 50 Element Channel Master which is giving me worse reception than the Radio shack 30 Element I just replaced. Particulaly KXAN 36 NBC. Got it before ...now can't recognize it. I Have 3 HDTV's.. some get some channels that others don't...Off the SAME antenna??? Also I get these numbered channels recognized on my scan that don't give me a picture ie 19,27 etc. Is it possible to have TOO powerful of an antenna? I can't believe a bigger antenna does't get a better picture than a smaller one I had. I used to sell video tape equip. and installed cable for a while in my younger years..so I'm pretty versed in these maters...but this is driving me crazy. any suggestions would be appreciated. Fuzzy in Austin As a rough "rule of thumb", the higher the gain a directional antenna has, the narrower its beamwidth. It's comparable to a candle vs a flashlight that way. One will illuminate an entire room weakly, while the other will illuminate a three-inch spot on the wall brightly. If your higher-gain antenna is pointing at one transmitting station, another could be outside of your antenna's narrow beam. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article .com,
"baldguy96" wrote: I recently moved to Austin TX from LA ( where I got great OTA HD. Here ( in Lakeway) I have spent a year screwing with the OTA HD. I went from TERK 55 ( no good) ..to now , a 50 Element Channel Master which is giving me worse reception than the Radio shack 30 Element I just replaced. Particulaly KXAN 36 NBC. Got it before ...now can't recognize it. I Have 3 HDTV's.. some get some channels that others don't...Off the SAME antenna??? Also I get these numbered channels recognized on my scan that don't give me a picture ie 19,27 etc. Is it possible to have TOO powerful of an antenna? I can't believe a bigger antenna does't get a better picture than a smaller one I had. I used to sell video tape equip. and installed cable for a while in my younger years..so I'm pretty versed in these maters...but this is driving me crazy. any suggestions would be appreciated. Fuzzy in Austin You're probably close enough to the towers that you need to aim your antenna properly to avoid too much multipath (the equivalent of analog "ghosting") interference with trees, hills, etc. The towers are on a hill on Loop 360 about a mile south of the big bridge. Here in Anderson Mill I have to aim the antenna for most of the local channels, but lately I've been able to get KXXV from Waco, even though that's way off-axis. Also, if you use an amplifier, put it as close to the antenna as possible. An amplifier can actually make a digital signal worse if it adds distortion. The way I figured out which way to aim my antenna was to mount it on a stand on the porch and rotate it until I got a good squawk off of my (2nd gen) tuner's signal meter. Then I mounted it on the chimney in that direction. If you've had HD before, then you probably have an older generation tuner which has problems with multipath. Multipath for me is so bad that _analog_ channel 7 is annoying to watch. When it rains, the multipath knocks out one or two digital channels. More than once I've wondered what was going on with the signal, then a minute or two later I hear the rain. And about every three or four months the wind blows my antenna off-axis and I have to climb a ladder and tweak it. You can probably even use a rabbit ears antenna as long as you get one with a rotatable UHF loop. At my mom's house in San Antonio, she can get all the digital stations with rabbit ears, which is good because her low-VHF cable TV picture quality is crap. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another Article About Sky's HDTV | DAB sounds worse than FM | UK sky | 10 | March 13th 05 04:07 PM |
| HDTV - after one year, I'm unimpressed | magnulus | High definition TV | 102 | December 27th 04 02:36 AM |
| Getting the masses to buy HDTV | CygnusX-1 | High definition TV | 6 | December 6th 04 06:14 AM |
| HDTV - after one year, I'm unimpressed using a 17" monitor | imjohnny | High definition TV | 0 | December 1st 04 10:43 AM |
| Completing the HDTV Picture | Ben Thomas | High definition TV | 0 | July 22nd 03 10:55 PM |