![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Charlie Pearce
writes On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:13:42 +0000, Prometheus wrote: Of course you could: either drink quicker, or get Dewar flask design mug. Or a Klein flask - they hold absolutely loads! Arguably they are entirely outside; there are certain logistical difficulties in having one delivered to our three dimensional universe. -- Ian G8ILZ |
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
|
The message
from Digby contains these words: ====snip==== Well the later chargers obviously don't have zero current when not charging, but it is reasonable low. As I just happen to have an old and new charger handy I thought I'd measure their current. Old charger On charge 4.3W No phone connected 1.38W New charger On charge 3.2W No phone connected 0.11W Are those wattage figures calculated from a current and voltage measurement, or do you have a very expensive watt meter capable of 3 digit accuracy on a 10 or 20 watt FSD setting? If the former and the current measurements were 5,75mA and 0.458mA respectively on a 240v supply, you might be over-estimating the power consumption of the older charger by a few tens of percentage. The later switched mode unit is probably only a few percent adrift from reality. TBH, Those plugtop (50Hz) transformers are abysmally high loss devices typically consuming 2 or 3 watts on no load. The best such plugtop transformer I tested being, funnily enough, one designed for a telephone answering machine which only wasted half a watt on no load. My measurements, BTW, were made using an analogue watt meter with mirrored (anti-parallax error) scale on the lowest setting of 100W FSD. If you've measured using a watt meter, I'd really love to know the make and model of the instrument you used. :-) -- Regards, John. Please remove the "ohggcyht" before replying. The address has been munged to reject Spam-bots. |
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Johnny B Good
writes The message from Digby contains these words: ====snip==== Well the later chargers obviously don't have zero current when not charging, but it is reasonable low. As I just happen to have an old and new charger handy I thought I'd measure their current. Old charger On charge 4.3W No phone connected 1.38W New charger On charge 3.2W No phone connected 0.11W Are those wattage figures calculated from a current and voltage measurement, or do you have a very expensive watt meter capable of 3 digit accuracy on a 10 or 20 watt FSD setting? If the former and the current measurements were 5,75mA and 0.458mA respectively on a 240v supply, you might be over-estimating the power consumption of the older charger by a few tens of percentage. The later switched mode unit is probably only a few percent adrift from reality. TBH, Those plugtop (50Hz) transformers are abysmally high loss devices typically consuming 2 or 3 watts on no load. The best such plugtop transformer I tested being, funnily enough, one designed for a telephone answering machine which only wasted half a watt on no load. My measurements, BTW, were made using an analogue watt meter with mirrored (anti-parallax error) scale on the lowest setting of 100W FSD. If you've measured using a watt meter, I'd really love to know the make and model of the instrument you used. :-) Use a 4-way extension plugged into a standard watt meter, with a table lamp plugged in to the extension, as well as the device you want to measure. Turn on lamp, measure reading, plug in charger, measure reading and subtract. Rinse and repeat if required. -- Chris |
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pyriform wrote:
I have this morning received a communication from my current energy supplier, Southern Electric. After explaining that they've fulfilled their May promise not to increase my prices again for the rest of 2006, and are therefore now going to increase them from 1st January 2007, they point me in the direction of their handy energy-saving leaflet, which they have enclosed. "Work WONDERS in a WEEKEND", it proclaims, ahead of a list of 4 energy saving priorities. In fourth place, the fridge-freezer. In third place, the standby buttons. At number 2, the boiler thermostat (not the room thermostat, as those of us less expert in the field might have predicted). But in pole position, the lethal, energy guzzling mobile phone charger. I quote: "1 Unplug your mobile phone charger These little black boxes suck 100kWhrs a day from your socket, even when your phone is fully charged!" so do the power supplies that power my 2 external drives, the power supply that keeps my mouse charged up, then the four power supplies that keep my Dect phones charged. the power supply that keep my answering machine answering the phone. My freeview box and my DVd recorder, both on standby then there is my computer which is on 24 hours a day. so there is no way I am going to worry about a piddly little mobile phone charger. In other words I don't give a crap, I pay for my electric and if anyone got a problem with that then tough. |
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
AD C wrote:
"1 Unplug your mobile phone charger These little black boxes suck 100kWhrs a day from your socket, even when your phone is fully charged!" so do the power supplies that power my 2 external drives, the power supply that keeps my mouse charged up, then the four power supplies that keep my Dect phones charged. the power supply that keep my answering machine answering the phone. My freeview box and my DVd recorder, both on standby then there is my computer which is on 24 hours a day. so there is no way I am going to worry about a piddly little mobile phone charger. Good grief man! That's nearly 46kW. And I bet those aren't your only electrical appliances. How do you stay cool? In other words I don't give a crap, I pay for my electric and if anyone got a problem with that then tough. That's the spirit. |
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pyriform" wrote in message
... AD C wrote: "1 Unplug your mobile phone charger These little black boxes suck 100kWhrs a day from your socket, even when your phone is fully charged!" so do the power supplies that power my 2 external drives, the power supply that keeps my mouse charged up, then the four power supplies that keep my Dect phones charged. the power supply that keep my answering machine answering the phone. My freeview box and my DVd recorder, both on standby then there is my computer which is on 24 hours a day. so there is no way I am going to worry about a piddly little mobile phone charger. Good grief man! That's nearly 46kW. And I bet those aren't your only electrical appliances. How do you stay cool? I expect he has aircon. -- Max Demian |
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
"AD C" wrote in message . uk... so do the power supplies that power my 2 external drives, the power supply that keeps my mouse charged up, then the four power supplies that keep my Dect phones charged. the power supply that keep my answering machine answering the phone. My freeview box and my DVd recorder, both on standby then there is my computer which is on 24 hours a day. so there is no way I am going to worry about a piddly little mobile phone charger. In other words I don't give a crap, I pay for my electric and if anyone got a problem with that then tough. That's more or less my attitude. I'm not going to put myself out worrying about power usage until (a) The Chinese agree to go back to pre-industrial poverty (b) Absurd city road schemes that cause vehicles to travel unneccessary miles are abolished (c) Bus lanes, which cause pollution by increasing traffic congestion, are abolished (d) The offices on Canary Wharf stop wasting £7k worth of electricity every night by leaving lights and computers on (e) We get some nuclear power stations built (d) The government tell Sky that they can't continue to supply receivers that use 25W on standby and 'have to be left on standby'. (Fat chance of the government telling Sky to do anything though) Bill |
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
The message
from Chris contains these words: In message , Johnny B Good writes The message from Digby contains these words: ====snip==== Well the later chargers obviously don't have zero current when not charging, but it is reasonable low. As I just happen to have an old and new charger handy I thought I'd measure their current. Old charger On charge 4.3W No phone connected 1.38W New charger On charge 3.2W No phone connected 0.11W Are those wattage figures calculated from a current and voltage measurement, or do you have a very expensive watt meter capable of 3 digit accuracy on a 10 or 20 watt FSD setting? If the former and the current measurements were 5,75mA and 0.458mA respectively on a 240v supply, you might be over-estimating the power consumption of the older charger by a few tens of percentage. The later switched mode unit is probably only a few percent adrift from reality. TBH, Those plugtop (50Hz) transformers are abysmally high loss devices typically consuming 2 or 3 watts on no load. The best such plugtop transformer I tested being, funnily enough, one designed for a telephone answering machine which only wasted half a watt on no load. My measurements, BTW, were made using an analogue watt meter with mirrored (anti-parallax error) scale on the lowest setting of 100W FSD. If you've measured using a watt meter, I'd really love to know the make and model of the instrument you used. :-) Use a 4-way extension plugged into a standard watt meter, with a table lamp plugged in to the extension, as well as the device you want to measure. Turn on lamp, measure reading, plug in charger, measure reading and subtract. Rinse and repeat if required. That technique suggests you're using an electronic type of watt meter capable of 3 digit accuracy but unable to report power readings below a certain power level (ISTR an Aldi special which wouldn't read (or read reliably) below 7 watts). Is this the type of meter you're referring to as a "standard watt meter"? That technique of calculating the consumption from the difference between a lamp on its own and a lamp plus kit on test would _reduce_ the accuracy of the reading on _my_ standard watt meter. I can interpolate to a tenth of a watt reading if I use a jeweler's loupe or high powered magnifying glass to closely examine the zero end of the scale knowing that a 5% inaccuracy would be simply a 5% inaccuracy of the tenth of a watt reading I was taking rather than that of 60 watt and a 60.1 watt readings which would be subject to the effect of short term variations in mains voltage. It's not entirely clear what it is you're referring to as a "standard watt meter". Could you offer more detail such as whether it's an analogue or an electronic digital type of meter? I only ask because I'm quite impressed, nay, intrigued, by the precision of your no load wattage readings at such low power levels on mains voltage kit. -- Regards, John. Please remove the "ohggcyht" before replying. The address has been munged to reject Spam-bots. |
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Johnny B Good
writes The message from Chris contains these words: In message , Johnny B Good writes The message from Digby contains these words: ====snip==== Well the later chargers obviously don't have zero current when not charging, but it is reasonable low. As I just happen to have an old and new charger handy I thought I'd measure their current. Old charger On charge 4.3W No phone connected 1.38W New charger On charge 3.2W No phone connected 0.11W Are those wattage figures calculated from a current and voltage measurement, or do you have a very expensive watt meter capable of 3 digit accuracy on a 10 or 20 watt FSD setting? If the former and the current measurements were 5,75mA and 0.458mA respectively on a 240v supply, you might be over-estimating the power consumption of the older charger by a few tens of percentage. The later switched mode unit is probably only a few percent adrift from reality. TBH, Those plugtop (50Hz) transformers are abysmally high loss devices typically consuming 2 or 3 watts on no load. The best such plugtop transformer I tested being, funnily enough, one designed for a telephone answering machine which only wasted half a watt on no load. My measurements, BTW, were made using an analogue watt meter with mirrored (anti-parallax error) scale on the lowest setting of 100W FSD. If you've measured using a watt meter, I'd really love to know the make and model of the instrument you used. :-) Use a 4-way extension plugged into a standard watt meter, with a table lamp plugged in to the extension, as well as the device you want to measure. Turn on lamp, measure reading, plug in charger, measure reading and subtract. Rinse and repeat if required. That technique suggests you're using an electronic type of watt meter capable of 3 digit accuracy but unable to report power readings below a certain power level (ISTR an Aldi special which wouldn't read (or read reliably) below 7 watts). Is this the type of meter you're referring to as a "standard watt meter"? That technique of calculating the consumption from the difference between a lamp on its own and a lamp plus kit on test would _reduce_ the accuracy of the reading on _my_ standard watt meter. I can interpolate to a tenth of a watt reading if I use a jeweler's loupe or high powered magnifying glass to closely examine the zero end of the scale knowing that a 5% inaccuracy would be simply a 5% inaccuracy of the tenth of a watt reading I was taking rather than that of 60 watt and a 60.1 watt readings which would be subject to the effect of short term variations in mains voltage. It's not entirely clear what it is you're referring to as a "standard watt meter". Could you offer more detail such as whether it's an analogue or an electronic digital type of meter? I only ask because I'm quite impressed, nay, intrigued, by the precision of your no load wattage readings at such low power levels on mains voltage kit. I didn't perform the original tests posted earlier, but I personally use the following: http://www.machinemart.co.uk/product.asp?p=010916213 As you pointed out, there can be a problem with measurement of very low wattage appliances which is why I posted the technique above. -- Chris |
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pyriform wrote:
Good grief man! That's nearly 46kW. And I bet those aren't your only electrical appliances. How do you stay cool? I doubt it is any where near that amount. As you said I still have more, my fridge/freezer, my washing machine, vacume cleaner, clock radio, coffee maker which is used every morning, my george foreman, microwave and my juicer. the one thing i have not got is a dish washer. In other words I don't give a crap, I pay for my electric and if anyone got a problem with that then tough. That's the spirit. Oh yes. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Where is a mobile phone :-) | PEO from ITALY | UK digital tv | 0 | October 27th 06 05:12 PM |
| Enjoy High Quality incredible low cost PC-to-phone and broadband phone services | John | UK home cinema | 0 | May 19th 05 03:55 PM |
| UK indoor | Bob Miller | High definition TV | 93 | April 12th 05 02:29 PM |
| Mobile phone disturbing Sky | Denyo | UK sky | 6 | November 7th 04 01:31 PM |
| Mobile Phone Interference | Tony Walton | UK digital tv | 5 | October 11th 03 08:13 PM |