![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Street price on the Sony is only about $200 more than the others,
typically in these sets. With the Sony you can get rather consistent performance that is closer than the others to HD standards for color temp and color processing that is closer than the others before significant calibration. The Samsung has the most capacity for being calibrated tightly to standard and the potential to be the best set of the bunch, but they are very inconsistent OOB and you need experience and the right equipment to calibrate them properly. The Toshiba is a decent set, but I would have either of the others first, in terms of performance. From a service perspective, Sony still has the best support of the three, easily. The Samsung DLP sets have given DLP a bad rep with their tendency to have lots of strange problems and color wheel failures. Toshiba has had a reputation for several years now for running very lean on spare parts. Try to buy a Hyper module for one of the H series sets that are just a few years old. Overall, Sony is a bit more expensive, but they do have nice products that are in some cases very competetive and compared to most vendors, better service support. Leonard -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 16759 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now! |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since this thread has continued longer than I had envisioned, I might as
well address another concern. The concern relates to viewing SD on my Sony-to be- purchased. How is the picture quality on SD (with Comcast) on the Sony set? Is it that poor that I should consider the XBR1 version? By ther way, since February of 1981 I've been watching through a Sony KP-5020, a 50 inch front projection tv from Sony. I have never needed any repairs on it and it is one of the best investments I ever made. I am only changing now because the 480 resolution is really blown away by all the later technology. I'll hate to part with my KP-5020 and will just give it away. "Richard" wrote in message ... "Khee Mao" wrote in message ... "Art Landy" wrote in message . .. I have narrowed my buying choices down to 1-Sony KDS 60A2000 2-Samsung HL-S6187W 3-Toshiba 62HM196 The Sony is $600-$700 more than each of the others, which are DLP sets. Is that price warranted by Sony's technology? Consumer Reports gives the highest kudos to rhe Toshiba set, yet has not yet evaluated the other two. Other than the price differential, would anyone have advice on which would represent the wisest purchase? sony preys on the fact that girls and effeminates are brand whores. I can't knock their xbrs though. The Sony has been well received and Sony has done a good job correcting early sets with a software error and the Green Blob. They have extended the warranty on the light engine to two years because of the Green Blob (lack of color purity on a light background). The set is software up-datable through a USB connector. The only thing it lacks is a cable card slot and an iLink input. The replacement version has been shown already at the tech shows and it is narrower, but I don't know of any major technical changes. The XBR version comes with a spare replacement bulb and speakers on the side. Someone is working on a self-calibration software/hardware interface that will calibrate the set through its USB port based on input from a piece of hardware that reads off the screen. Now that will be interesting if it ever sees the light of day. Richard. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Their customer service is ok. Their warranty replacement(on smaller
.... service(around here anyway) - they suck. It is not really their fault, but they rely on local, lazy, not there most of the time repair shops. So I would make sure that local repairs shops in your are get So does Sony...at least in my area. In fact, all brands seem to use the same awful repair outfit around here except for the specialty shop that provides good service for its own customers. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since this thread has continued longer than I had envisioned, I might
as well address another concern. The concern relates to viewing SD on my Sony-to be- purchased. How is the picture quality on SD (with Comcast) on the Sony set? Is it that poor that I should consider the I have never seen an HDTV that displayed SD with good quality. To me, digital cable looks terrible on both large screen SDTVs and HDTVs. The analog signal is passable on large screen SDTVs, but looks nasty on HDTVs. I'm speaking from experience with Comcast cable, too. It's to the point where if a channel is not HD, I think extra hard about why I've even tuned to it. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
My two cents and worth every penny ;-)
I looked long & hard at both the latest Samsung and Sony rear projection sets (50" - 60" range). In the store the Samsungs (DLP) actually looked a bit better but the mechanical color wheel bothered me little bit (mechanical... moving parts, ya know). In the end I bought the Sony KDS60A2000. Got the best price from "Brands Mart", then went to the local HiFi Buys (was locally owned, now part of the Tweeter group) and they matched price. Their customer care and return policies are quite good. I've had this set now for a few months (I got one of the first sets to ship to the HiFi Buy warehouse). The picture quality is superb and the wider viewing angle is quite adequate. (I think it is 65 degrees either side of the center axis of the screen). I continue to be amazed at how good HD can be even though we've had 1000 line resolution in the TV studios for years. Be prepared to see a wide variation in HD quality from program to program. Networks and local affiliates are in the process of converting to HD and are learning as they go. The best HD quality is transmitted over the air (OTA) since it is the least compressed, if at all. The other delivery systems, satellite & cable, use some amount of compression because there bandwidth is limited. In terms of content the best quality currently are national sporting events because larger audiences mean more justification to spend more money on the best cameras & lenses. Also, you may be quite surprised what stations you can receive with just a short piece of wire as an antenna (ain't digital wonderful?). "Art Landy" wrote in message . .. I have narrowed my buying choices down to 1-Sony KDS 60A2000 2-Samsung HL-S6187W 3-Toshiba 62HM196 The Sony is $600-$700 more than each of the others, which are DLP sets. Is that price warranted by Sony's technology? Consumer Reports gives the highest kudos to rhe Toshiba set, yet has not yet evaluated the other two. Other than the price differential, would anyone have advice on which would represent the wisest purchase? |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
"tq96" wrote in message ... I have never seen an HDTV that displayed SD with good quality. My 42A10 does a superb job of SD. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sony Wega iDTV "no longer compatible with DVB"?!? | [email protected] | UK digital tv | 9 | March 7th 06 04:39 PM |
| Could the Playstation 3 Kill Sony? | Air Raid | High definition TV | 0 | February 10th 06 02:08 AM |
| Pioneer VSX-D407 with no remote & using Sony sub & bookshelf surrounds | Dennman6 | Home theater (general) | 1 | February 3rd 06 05:47 PM |
| SONY SXRDs vs the new Samsung 1080p DLPs 6178 | Pravin | High definition TV | 12 | November 4th 05 11:14 PM |
| Does Tivo have a max storage capacity ?? | analyser | Tivo personal television | 16 | July 21st 03 08:04 PM |