![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there a significant difference in the picture quality between these two?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
bmoag wrote:
Is there a significant difference in the picture quality between these two? Sometimes. Usually satellite is better for cable stations (non-HD) and worse for locals (non-HD). At least that's been my experience. HD should be comparable on both. -- David G. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"David G." wrote in message ... bmoag wrote: Is there a significant difference in the picture quality between these two? Sometimes. Usually satellite is better for cable stations (non-HD) and worse for locals (non-HD). At least that's been my experience. HD should be comparable on both. -- David G. Mine is just the opposite. My analog cable is better on a 42" Panny Plasma monitor. Z. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In my experience satellite has always been better than cable (in both sound
and picture quality), although allot depends simply on the hardware (receiver). One thing I've noticed is that the menus and ease of use features available on most satellite receivers is WAY better than cable receivers. Faster response times in changing channels, and opening menus are another benifit. One thing I just recently noticed: look in the back of the cable companies lot and tell me what you see..... (satellite dishes...) pretty funny stuff. "David G." wrote in message ... bmoag wrote: Is there a significant difference in the picture quality between these two? Sometimes. Usually satellite is better for cable stations (non-HD) and worse for locals (non-HD). At least that's been my experience. HD should be comparable on both. -- David G. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
From on top of The Wall I yelled "YOU! YES YOU Mike B
! Stand still laddie. Oh, and which one is Pink?" In my experience satellite has always been better than cable (in both sound and picture quality), although allot depends simply on the hardware (receiver). One thing I've noticed is that the menus and ease of use features available on most satellite receivers is WAY better than cable receivers. Faster response times in changing channels, and opening menus are another benifit. One thing I just recently noticed: look in the back of the cable companies lot and tell me what you see..... (satellite dishes...) pretty funny stuff. The difference is that the dishes they are using are FAR more powerful than what the DirecTV/Dish Network ones are capable of. -- Brian "Demolition Man" Little A reminder to the world.... "Well, in my case, I get VCRs from the Goodwill thrift store that allows a return in 7 days, that way I can ascertain the similar components (or lift a fuse or belt for my own evil purposes)!" -Bill Schwenke |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digital Cable & DTV Difference | Phil | High definition TV | 12 | December 18th 03 04:47 PM |
| Does digital cable remove analog from line? | Prime | High definition TV | 4 | December 5th 03 09:08 AM |
| Digital Cable - Analogue Cable | Neil Donovan | High definition TV | 3 | November 27th 03 07:05 PM |
| Best hook up for HD Cable, HDTV, and Tivo? Please help | Miles | High definition TV | 3 | November 22nd 03 04:28 PM |
| Buying Digital? Read This! | Ann Meffert | Home theater (general) | 0 | November 10th 03 07:11 PM |