TV roles urged for women wearing hijab

That would be educated women then.

Strong independent, educated, Muslim career women from traditional
Muslim families. On the one hand reading the news whilst wearing a
hijab and on the other a strong supporter for the introduction of
Sharia Law.

Just like our Ruth does, working in an office full of men whilst hubby
is at home getting the kid's tea.

The sort of woman that the Taliban would execute and the sort that
would end up on the end of a good flogging in Iran.

Of course, it will never happen because the media and the audiences are
all institutionally racist whereas the Muslim community could only be
totally suportative.

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:30:25 GMT, Paul Hyett
wrote:



Oh what a load of anti-Semitic BS.

There is no, and has *never* been, any Jewish world domination plot!

But half of the internet content is based on this premise!

ACC

Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.

How about having the first nudist Cabinet Minister while we're at it?
Go on Kelly! Get your kit off and have a game of volleyball!

wrote:
Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...1/nhijab21.xml

Really, I won't take television seriously until the day we see the
first chief constable in a hijab, then Judeo-British television will
parallel and link up nicely with Judeo-American television with it's
police chief characters who are almost always black.

I don't watch telly anyway and exactly for that reason - television
is used to supply opinions, not facts, and they are opinions which
are invariably offensive to me. Imagine the government saying "The
country needs more Ethno-nationalists in front line roles in the
media, British ones".


Who controls the British media:
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/s...media_uk.shtml

Even though the Jews are only 0.5% of the population in Britain,
they have an almost total grip on the media here, systematically,
constantly and intensely feeding their propaganda and example to
almost everyone in Britain, which is nothing new. With this media,
they are uniformly, deliberately, systematically, constantly and
intensely promoting both the transformation and permanent
destruction of Britain into a multiracial, "multicultural" state,
and also the interests of the so-called "state of Israel", against
the wishes and interests of
the native British people.

The television media that they control broadcast into almost every
home in Britain, all day, every day. BBC television under the Jew
Alan Yentob broadcasts into almost every home all day, every day.
Likewise ITV, which is controlled by Carlton Communications plc
under the Jew Michael Green and by Granada plc under the Jew Steve
Morrison, each of which broadcasts to regions of 26 million, half
of the population, or more, all day, every day. Daytime television
across the ITV network, which is broadcasted to the whole of
Britain, every day, is mainly provided by Granada's Anglia
Television under the Jew Graham
Creelman, while the rest of the time it is controlled by the other
regions controlled by Carlton Communications plc and Granada plc.
Likewise ITN, which provides the news for the ITV network every
day, is controlled by the Jew Michael Green and its programmes are
broadcast to the whole of Britain, while Carlton and Granada
jointly own the London News Network. Channel 4 under the Jew
Giovanni Treves accounts for 10% of all television viewing in
Britain. Further, BSkyB controlled by the suspected Jew and
obsessively Zionist Rupert Murdoch broadcasts to over 10 million
subscribers and their families every day. The situation is similar
in radio, with all BBC radio stations controlled by the Jewess
Jenny Abramsky, alone accounting for 49% of all radio listening in
Britain, every day.

Further, in total, over 85 million copies of Jewish controlled
newspapers are sold in Britain every week, controlled by the Jewish
pornographer, Richard Desmond, the suspected Jew and obsessively
Zionist Rupert Murdoch, the jew Rupert Murdoch, the Jew Guy Zitter,
the openly Shabbat Goy and rabidly Zionist Conrad Black and "Mrs
Black", who is the Jewess Barbara Amiel.

They deliberately, constantly, systematically and intensely use this
media to promote the multiracial and "multicultural" transformation
of Britain against the wishes of the British people. That is
treachery, treason, of a terrific magnitude. Along with mass,
coloured immigration, they are also deliberately encouraging mass
inter-racial marriage, race-mixing, which will mean the extinction
of our race.


Who controls the American media?:
http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/

For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and
socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge"
Black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented
homosexual, or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from
Mexico. On the other hand, a White racist-that is, any racially
conscious White person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the
rapidly darkening racial situation in America-is portrayed, at
best, as a despicable bigot who is reviled by the other characters,
or, at worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by
firearms and is a menace to all law-abiding citizens. The White
racist "gun nut," in fact, has become a familiar stereotype on TV
shows.

The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an
unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations
and reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the
televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as
he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans
the real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV
environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge to
conform responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval
of some ideas and actions through the TV characters for whom he is
writing, and disapproval of others, he exerts a powerful pressure
on millions of viewers toward conformity with his own views.

And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news,
whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of
thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or
news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most
of us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but
also they establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the
permissible spectrum of opinion. [...]



Ruth Kelly looks and sounds like a teenage boy btw:

http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7...thkellybq4.jpg



--
Ta!

Nige

Subaru WRX (54)
Land Rover Turbo Diesel 110 (G)
KTM 520 SX (2001)
Kawasaki ZZR 1100 (1995)

In uk.politics.misc wrote:
Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...1/nhijab21.xml

Oh dear... what rubbish... what is the purpose behind a 'minister for
women' anyway? Is there one for men?

Why cares who reads the news... they are just teleprompt readers
anyway... it would make more sense if instead of showing their faces,
actual TV footage were shown of what they are talking about were to be
shown instead.

Axel

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:06:37 +0100, "Heracles Pollux"
wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.



Fine, and motorcyclists should be allowed to walk in to shops and petrol
stations with full face helmets on.

And hoodies should be allowed to go around like elves with their faces
hidden.

And if people want to walk in to banks with tights over their heads, they
should.


WRONG. This is the wrong country for this nonsense. In this country, we look
at facial expressions and use eye contact in order to understand and
communicate with each other.

Apart from "female circumcision", this is one of the most stupid ideas Islam
has ever come up with.

If Ruth Kelly wants to grant this concession to their barbaric, feudal,
arranged marriage culture, then she's even more stupid then she sounds.



A few months ago I was out and saw a man and a woman walking through
the pedestrianised area of the city I was in. She had a full body
black hijab on, and her face was covered, you know, the works. Thing
is, I guess it was cold because as she walked by, she lifted up one of
her arms and I quite clearly saw the outline of one of her nipples! I
couldn't believe it--how much of an heretic must I be for having seen
such a thing, if even someone's /face/ can't be allowed to be shown in
public? I almost feel worried about posting this, for fear of the
consequences if someone tries to track me down, especially if it'll be
archived on Google for ever. Time to move house I guess.

In uk.politics.misc Paul Hyett wrote:
In uk.media.tv.misc on Thu, 21 Sep 2006, wrote :

Who controls the British media:
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/s...media_uk.shtml

Even though the Jews are only 0.5% of the population in Britain, they
have an almost total grip on the media here, systematically, constantly
and intensely feeding their propaganda and example to almost everyone
in Britain, which is nothing new.

Oh what a load of anti-Semitic BS.

Actually it is not BS... in the sense that certainly in the US and
to a lesser degree in the UK, the Zionist lobby is able to exert a
great deal of pressure on what the media will actually carry either
as news stories or as advertisements.

A few years ago I used to do a lot of work in the field of setting
up websites, domain names, hosting, and so on. From personal
experience I came across a couple of cases where a hosting company
had been basically told to stop hosting a certain site or business
would be withdrawn. Which is what happened. The interesting thing
was that the company making the threat obviously had a greater
financial clout, but also that it was totally unlikely that that
business would have somehow stumbled across the website it objected
to and connected it with being hosted by the same company... in
other words there was obviously a third-party out there, finding
what to its view was an objectionable site, and then asking someone
else to put pressure to bear.

Axel

On 21 Sep 2006 01:58:14 -0700, wrote:

Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.

They are going to look really silly wearing one of these

http://www.hiab.se/html/nyheter/2004...b60_bild07.jpg


--

Mike wrote:
On 21 Sep 2006 01:58:14 -0700, wrote:

Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.

They are going to look really silly wearing one of these

http://www.hiab.se/html/nyheter/2004...b60_bild07.jpg

Someone should start a religion whose followers have to wear a baseball cap
that says "Ruth Kelly's A ****".

"John Rowland" wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:
On 21 Sep 2006 01:58:14 -0700, wrote:

Muslim women wearing hijab, or headscarves, should be employed in
front-line roles in the media, said a report published yesterday by
Ruth Kelly, the minister for women.

They are going to look really silly wearing one of these

http://www.hiab.se/html/nyheter/2004...b60_bild07.jpg

Someone should start a religion whose followers have to wear a baseball
cap that says "Ruth Kelly Likes A ****".

Typo Fixed ;-)